Each day of rescue and reconstruction after the 921 earthquake is a chapter in the history of natural disasters in Taiwan. The people of Taiwan have come together in this time of trial, regardless of ethnicity, yet a small number of people have been overly critical of relief efforts, consistently airing their grievances in live talk shows set up at disaster sites. Although native to Taiwan, those who stir up trouble whenever Taiwan is enveloped by disaster are more like strangers to this land.
Taiwan is finally emerging from the depths of the tragedy of last month's tremor, and is hard at work at reconstruction.
Lee Yuan-tseh (
The destructive forces of nature are to be feared, but the moving stories and pictures of selfless heroes in Taiwan's tragedy prove that we have not been defeated.
Minor mishaps and oversights are bound to happen in any lengthy rescue and reconstruction process, and all errors should be corrected immediately. Disagreements may also break out over the order in which damage should be repaired, but these are inconsequential as long as the overall disaster relief continues unabated. Unsolicited and emotionally distorted criticism, however, is destructive at a time when a common sense of purpose and high levels of morale are required.
During the relief efforts, we witnessed a small number of people (including a small group of politicians, scholars, and media personalities) repeatedly criticizing relief efforts. Their criticism revealed the fact that some residents of Taiwan view themselves as little more than strangers in this land.
The beneficiaries of the old repressive political apparatus in Taiwan became alienated from society after democratization. Their social foundation eroded and they now look down upon new politicians much like a declining class of aristocrats, casting scorn on Taiwan's public as well.
While recovery efforts were still proceeding and the government was at its busiest, some individuals ceaselessly censured the government, proclaiming, in self-satisfaction, "Just as I predicted! The government is useless!"
This complacent attitude is Taiwan's real disaster.
Hu Wen-huei is Deputy Editor in Chief of the Liberty Times.
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in