In a country famed for its unwieldy bureaucracy, the announcement this past weekend that two national committees had been formed to deal with Taiwan's quake reconstruction efforts might ordinarily have drawn a groan of dismay from the public. That it did not is testament to the potential of both to speed up and improve the quality of current government-led operations. As such, their establishment should be commended and their members should be encouraged in their work.
The Nationwide Civilian Post-quake Reconstruction Coordination and Review Alliance (全國民間災後重建協調監督聯盟) led by Academia Sinica President Lee Yuan-Tseh (
Both organizations are intended to perform the vital function, which this paper has called for, of monitoring and coordinating the massive flow of donations -- at latest count, totalling nearly NT$9 billion -- that the people of Taiwan have contributed to help victims of the quake rebuild their lives. Without such organizations there exists a serious gap in accountability, which raises the possibility of waste or misuse of these funds. Were that to happen, the recovery would certainly be delayed or impeded and a tremendous opportunity would be squandered for Taiwan to develop a culture of civic philanthropy.
With so much at stake, these committees need to go to work without delay. The selection of their leaders is a good first step, as both are highly respected members of their communities. The large number of NGOs that have joined the Reconstruction Coordination and Review Alliance is also an excellent sign.
We have two further recommendations to make, however. First, the two organizations should not be merged, as some have suggested. Their character and functions, although similar, are distinct and should remain so. The Reconstruction Coordination and Review Alliance should remain completely independent of the government, including only NGO and academic representatives, and it should maintain its bat against politicians. Only then would it have the moral authority and credibility to supervise the reconstruction work being carried out by Taiwan's NGOs.
The Civil Donations Management Committee should be a mixed bunch, including NGOs, but also including business and government representatives. The announcement that Lee will join as vice-chairman, and that Legislative Yuan speaker Wang Jyn-ping (
The second suggestion is that a legal basis be created for the operation of the committees as soon as possible, through legislation or administrative guidelines, defining their responsibilities and authorizing their powers, taking into account the above principles.
We are already seeing danger signs of abuse of the enormous budgets available for reconstruction, for example in the apparent political maneuvering between different levels of government and different political parties. The urgency and necessity of properly functioning oversight bodies is clear. Hopefully, these two committees will be able to fill this crucial role.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS