In a country famed for its unwieldy bureaucracy, the announcement this past weekend that two national committees had been formed to deal with Taiwan's quake reconstruction efforts might ordinarily have drawn a groan of dismay from the public. That it did not is testament to the potential of both to speed up and improve the quality of current government-led operations. As such, their establishment should be commended and their members should be encouraged in their work.
The Nationwide Civilian Post-quake Reconstruction Coordination and Review Alliance (全國民間災後重建協調監督聯盟) led by Academia Sinica President Lee Yuan-Tseh (
Both organizations are intended to perform the vital function, which this paper has called for, of monitoring and coordinating the massive flow of donations -- at latest count, totalling nearly NT$9 billion -- that the people of Taiwan have contributed to help victims of the quake rebuild their lives. Without such organizations there exists a serious gap in accountability, which raises the possibility of waste or misuse of these funds. Were that to happen, the recovery would certainly be delayed or impeded and a tremendous opportunity would be squandered for Taiwan to develop a culture of civic philanthropy.
With so much at stake, these committees need to go to work without delay. The selection of their leaders is a good first step, as both are highly respected members of their communities. The large number of NGOs that have joined the Reconstruction Coordination and Review Alliance is also an excellent sign.
We have two further recommendations to make, however. First, the two organizations should not be merged, as some have suggested. Their character and functions, although similar, are distinct and should remain so. The Reconstruction Coordination and Review Alliance should remain completely independent of the government, including only NGO and academic representatives, and it should maintain its bat against politicians. Only then would it have the moral authority and credibility to supervise the reconstruction work being carried out by Taiwan's NGOs.
The Civil Donations Management Committee should be a mixed bunch, including NGOs, but also including business and government representatives. The announcement that Lee will join as vice-chairman, and that Legislative Yuan speaker Wang Jyn-ping (
The second suggestion is that a legal basis be created for the operation of the committees as soon as possible, through legislation or administrative guidelines, defining their responsibilities and authorizing their powers, taking into account the above principles.
We are already seeing danger signs of abuse of the enormous budgets available for reconstruction, for example in the apparent political maneuvering between different levels of government and different political parties. The urgency and necessity of properly functioning oversight bodies is clear. Hopefully, these two committees will be able to fill this crucial role.
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed