On the night of the Mid-Autumn Festival, a family next door gathered in the alley behind our house to have a barbecue. An old man, who is also a neighbor, pointed his finger at the family and said: "Today, Taiwan is encountering such a devastating tragedy, and many people have no food to eat. You guys have not contributed anything towards the rescue work and are still in the mood for a barbecue. How heartless you are!"
Hearing this, the family hurriedly packed up the barbecue grills and shamefully returned home.
When travelling by taxi on the way to the university for my classes, the driver said: "Recently, business has become slack, everyone has donated their money towards earthquake relief, and are left with no money to take taxis."
At schools, students no longer talk about where to go on the Mid-Autumn Festival, but instead, they are comparing the amount of money they have donated. Those who have not donated any money nor did not help out at the scene of the disaster are described as "so lame." The shame they feel is such that they are unable to raise their heads in front of other students.
From the disaster relief, we witness the Taiwanese people's sincerity, kindness and the brightness of human nature. Behind every rescue item and every donation is a heart of selflessness and faithfulness.
But there are still many questions that seem to be worrying the people. For example, exactly how do each of these organizations, groups and units distribute the donation money which they have collected? Is it distributed by each of these agencies, or by the government? If distribution is arranged by each agency, how can they ensure that distribution won't overlap, because each agency operates in its own way?
How can they ensure that aid is distributed fairly, so that all those who need aid within a given community receive the same amount. And how can the agencies make sure that the distribution operation will not disappoint the intentions of the donors? These are all problems that need to be examined.
Perhaps some may think that these are all groundless concerns -- the organizations which are in charge of fundraising certainly have the right to handle the money, so why worry so much?
However, just take a look at what has happened to private relief supplies: some people took up to eight tents each, while some, whose houses are in good condition and decorated sumptuously, asked for great quantities of relief supplies.
When faced with such a situation in which the organizations shoulder high expectations from their donors, as well as the inherent problems associated with dealing with tens of billions of dollars in donations, how can one not feel anxious?
Moreover, enterprise donations and the huge volume of individual donations call into question income tax and gift tax breaks.
The great amount of donations will influence government tax revenues in the future and reduce the government's capability to undertake post-disaster reconstruction work.
In addition, donations collected by each aid agency are more-or-less public affairs. Consequently, whether such aid will be fairly distributed, and whether the general public will ask the agencies to explain their actions if such distribution is deemed as unfair are affairs of the whole nation.
The agencies in charge of fundraising must be extremely cautious in their distribution plans to avoid public scandal, despite the fact that their intentions may be honest.
An ideal situation would begin with the government drawing up a long list of who needs what and how badly. The various agencies could then decide who they could help, given their financial resources and mission statement.
The government should make public the status of the list, so that if two or more agencies overlap in their "selections," the matter could be arbitrated in a manner that is beneficial to all involved.
Through such a policy, the problem of overlap can be avoided. Most importantly, due to the fact that the process is made public, supervision would be easy and accountability to donors achieved. Fundraising is easy, yet distribution is difficult. The demonstration of vitality in Taiwan's society has only just begun.
Hsiao Chun-chiu is a lawyer.
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
A delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials led by Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is to travel to China tomorrow for a six-day visit to Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing, which might end with a meeting between Cheng and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The trip was announced by Xinhua news agency on Monday last week, which cited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤) as saying that Cheng has repeatedly expressed willingness to visit China, and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and Xi have extended an invitation. Although some people have been speculating about a potential Xi-Cheng
The ongoing Iran conflict is putting Taiwan’s energy fragility on full display — the island of 23 million people, home to the world’s most advanced semiconductor manufacturing, is highly dependent on imported oil and gas, especially that from the Middle East. In 2025, 69.6 percent of Taiwan’s crude oil and 38.7 percent of liquified natural gas were sourced from the Middle East. In the same year, 62 percent of crude oil and 34 percent of LNG to Taiwan went through the Strait of Hormuz. Taiwan’s state-run oil company CPC Corp’s benchmark crude oil price (70 percent Dubai, 30 percent Brent)
RSS