The great quake of '99 is one of the worst tragedies to befall this island in a generation. As those most affected try to put their lives back into some semblance of order, there are those who would take advantage of others' misfortune for their own benefit. This only adds confusion atop complexities (
After the earthquake, the Taiwanese people -- from different ethnic groups, old and young, men and women -- all displayed an unprecedented sense of togetherness. There was a collective experience of an overflowing of emotions that seemed to bring the country closer.
Yet while all of these things have been happening, we now see several "vultures" hovering in disaster's sky.
The first species is the "political vulture." Hovering at the fringes, they show little real concern for relief efforts, and while men and women were furiously digging through the rubble, these opportunists were attacking procedures and each other.
The reprehensible actions of the political vultures shows that "winning the presidency at the expense of Taiwan" (
The second species is the "media vulture." Basically, these are of the same blood as the political vultures (obviously many reporters did an admirable job covering the aftermath of the quake with sense and compassion. This people should be appreciated for their work).
Media vultures are leftovers from the "old-guard," or certain figures who are treated as the "hired thugs" of a particular political party. During the disaster, these vultures stirred up trouble by teaming up with the political vultures to broadcast pathetic criticisms.
For example, statements such as: "how can a person trust this kind of government?" "Don't believe what the government says; don't let the government handle your donation to the victims of the quake!" These people are only good at taking pleasure in others' misfortune (
The third species is the "selfish vulture." Selfishness is part of human nature, yet after a great disaster, some people are so selfish that the first thing that they say is: "I must have my concerns attended to first; I don't care that others may be far worse off than me."
If these people don't get their way, they began to blame others.
Other examples of these sorts of scavengers are those who have taken advantage of the disaster to loot, to misappropriate donations of goods (as well as money) and those who gouge customers during the crisis just to make an extra dollar.
As if things were not already bad, must we contend with the sort of person who lives on suffering?
Hu Wen-huei is the Deputy Editor in Chief of the Liberty Times.
With the Year of the Snake reaching its conclusion on Monday next week, now is an opportune moment to reflect on the past year — a year marked by institutional strain and national resilience. For Taiwan, the Year of the Snake was a composite of political friction, economic momentum, social unease and strategic consolidation. In the political sphere, it was defined less by legislative productivity and more by partisan confrontation. The mass recall movement sought to remove 31 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators following the passage of controversial bills that expanded legislative powers and imposed sweeping budget cuts. While the effort
There is a story in India about a boy called Prahlad who was an ardent worshipper of Lord Narayana, whom his father considered an enemy. His son’s devotion vexed the father to the extent that he asked his sister, Holika, who could not be burned by fire, to sit with the boy in her lap and burn him to death. Prahlad knew about this evil plan, but sat in his aunt’s lap anyway. His faith won, as he remained unscathed by the fire, while his aunt was devoured by the flames. In some small way, Prahlad reminds me of Taiwan
When Hong Kong’s High Court sentenced newspaper owner Jimmy Lai (黎智英) to 20 years in prison this week, officials declared that his “heinous crimes” had long poisoned society and that his punishment represented justice restored. In their telling, Lai is the mastermind of Hong Kong’s unrest — the architect of a vast conspiracy that manipulated an otherwise contented population into defiance. They imply that removing him would lead to the return of stability. It is a politically convenient narrative — and a profoundly false one. Lai did not radicalize Hong Kong. He belonged to the same generation that fled from the Chinese
The top Chinese official in charge of Taiwan policy this week said that Beijing must gain dominance in cross-strait relations and firmly support “patriotic pro-reunification forces” in Taiwan. All Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials must “firmly grasp the initiative and dominance in cross-strait relations” to advance the “great cause of national reunification across the Taiwan Strait,” Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧) said at the Taiwan Work Conference, China’s annual event outling policies on Taiwan. Wang also reiterated the need to adhere to the “one China principle” and the so-called “1992 consensus,” to support Taiwanese compatriots who firmly support
RSS