China has never been so eager to participate in international affairs as it is today, actively playing a role in regional peace and security. But the "Taiwan question" has always been a mirror for China -- a way to gauge itself. Whenever China sees itself in this mirror, its true colors are reflected.
The enactment of the "Anti-Secession" Law has stirred up concern in the international community because China has damaged its image. China's territory is vast, its population large, and its problems serious. Why does it care so much about Taiwan and insist on claiming sovereignty over it?
General Wen Zongren (溫宗仁), a former political commissar of the Nanjing Military Region, publicly admitted in an interview that only when the "Taiwan question" is resolved can China break through the blockade imposed by the international community on its coastal security. Wen also said that only by controlling Taiwan can China develop its naval prowess and truly rise up.
His remarks pointed to the essence of the cross-strait issue. Prior to the 1970s, the cross-strait issue was a remnant of the civil war between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). From the 1980s on, it gradually became an issue of nationalism and patriotic sentiment. But after the end of the Cold War, it slowly emerged as an issue of strategic interest.
China has a formidable land-based military force, but in order to become a regional superpower, it must also possess sea power. As China becomes more dependent on oil imports, naval strength is required to maintain its energy and maritime security. But China's navy cannot move beyond the boundaries of the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea, and is locked in by a chain of islands which keeps it from exerting influence in the Pacific. Therefore, control over Taiwan is of strategic military importance to China, in its goal of projecting power in the region.
If Beijing does gain control over Taiwan, its submarines will be given a berth in Ilan County in eastern Taiwan, making the Taiwan Strait domestic Chinese waters and instantly making it a dominant Pacific nation, placing the South China Sea within range of China's military.
Gaining control over Taiwan, doesn't necessarily entail the use of military force. This can be achieved by adopting the Hong Kong model and creating a China-friendly government in Taiwan. Any reduction in Taiwan's national and psychological defenses will play into the hands of China.
However, a change to Taiwan's status will unavoidably affect the peace and stability of the Asia-Pacific region, which is not what the international community wants.
The development of cross-strait relations is closely connected to changes in the international environment. Changes to any international strategy might affect Taiwan's interests, as it is an essential piece in the strategy game.
Antonio Chiang is a former deputy secretary-general to the National Security Council.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry