Though the US is still the world's leading oil consumer, its might in the global petroleum business is dwindling.
Developing countries are locking up a bigger share of the world's oil and gas resources to profit from high prices and fuel industrial growth. Some experts view the shift as an emerging threat to the US economy, while others see benefits for consumers, saying an expanding list of suppliers diminishes the impact of any single disruption.
Still others see the shift simply as a reflection of globalization, whereby emerging economies lean on rising financial strength and technological know-how to become tougher competitors.
PHOTO: AP
New research by investment bank Goldman Sachs suggests four countries in particular -- Brazil, Russia, India and China, or the so-called BRIC countries -- are grabbing the most market share from US companies. The BRIC's share of the industry's market value has grown from virtually nothing 15 years ago to more than one third today, while US companies' stake has dwindled from more than half to less than a third.
The biggest factor, most analysts agree, is the growth of state-controlled national oil companies, including PetroChina Ltd, an arm of China National Petroleum Corp; Russia's OAO Gazprom, the world's biggest natural gas producer; and Brazil's Petroleo Brasileiro SA, or Petrobras. And the high price of oil -- crude futures finished Friday close to US$73 a barrel -- is playing a big role in their expansion plans.
China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC, 中國石油天然氣) last week acquired rights to search for oil in Canada. India's state-owned oil company, Oil and Natural Gas Corp divulged plans last month to expand in Brazil. And in May the Venezuelan government took majority control of its last privately run oil projects, part of a resource nationalization strategy also being pursued by Russia.
trend
Whether this trend is bad for the US' long-term strategic interests is debated by analysts and executives.
Daniel Yergin, author of The Prize, the Pulitzer Prize-winning history of the oil industry, said it's time to acknowledge what's been evolving for years: US oil companies simply don't have the clout they did a decade or two ago, and it's not necessarily a bad thing.
"A lot of our energy debate harkens back to a world when we were much more self sufficient and doesn't take into account the reality of how integrated we are into a much larger and complex global marketplace," Yergin said.
Exxon Mobil Corp remains the world's largest publicly traded oil company, and its US$39.5 billion profit last year was a record for US companies. Yet the Irving, Texas-based company pumped just 3 percent of the world's oil last year. National oil companies, which control almost 90 percent of global oil reserves, produced the bulk of the world's supply.
ConocoPhillips chairman Jim Mulva said the global petroleum hunt has become very competitive due in part to the rising influence of the BRIC countries, though he stopped short of calling them dominant. After all, the US' daily oil consumption of about 21 million barrels dwarfs that of the BRIC countries, whose combined daily use last year was about 15 million barrels, according to the US Energy Department.
Still, Mulva credited China and India with creating energy policies focused on keeping their economies expanding -- something he believes the US sorely lacks.
"When energy prices increase, we tend to place blame and not address the real issue: that is, how are we going to develop a long-term energy plan that stresses conservation, additional resources, technology and diversification versus the unrealistic expectation of independence," said Mulva, whose company operates in more than 40 countries and posted a record annual profit of US$15.5 billion last year.
Jerry Taylor, an energy analyst at the Cato Institute, a free-market oriented think tank, said the trend documented in the Goldman Sachs report doesn't necessarily make the US more vulnerable. Governments have rarely used the so-called "oil weapon" by cutting off supplies to other markets, he said. If they did they'd risk hurting themselves, due to lost revenue, more than they'd hurt the US, he added.
reasons
Goldman Sachs cites several reasons for the US' declining role, such as the growth of production outside of North America and Europe and consolidation, including BP PLC's acquisitions of US companies Amoco and Arco.
At the end of the first Gulf War in 1991, slightly more than half of the 20 largest companies in the energy industry by market capitalization were US, while less than half were European, according to the Goldman Sachs' study. Now, BRIC countries and Europe account for more than two-thirds of the companies, while American countries make up less than a third.
Antoine Halff, head of energy research at Fimat USA LLC, said the shift, driven mainly by the energy needs of the BRIC countries themselves, has its benefits. As more countries boost their production of oil and gas, hurricanes, terror attacks, pipeline accidents and other disruptions have less impact on the worldwide supply chain -- and on prices for consumers.
But others see longer term risks to the US relying too much on energy resources other nations control.
"Energy is beginning to look like a political weapon, and countries that have access to resources are sitting very pretty," said Fadel Gheit, an analyst at Oppenheimer & Co.
Taiwan’s Lee Chia-hao (李佳豪) on Sunday won a silver medal at the All England Open Badminton Championships in Birmingham, England, a career best. Lee, 25, took silver in the final of the men’s singles against world No. 1 Shi Yuqi (石宇奇) of China, who won 21-17, 21-19 in a tough match that lasted 51 minutes. After the match, the Taiwanese player, who ranks No. 22 in the world, said it felt unreal to be challenging an opponent of Shi’s caliber. “I had to be in peak form, and constantly switch my rhythm and tactics in order to score points effectively,” he said. Lee got
EMBRACING TAIWAN: US lawmakers have introduced an act aiming to replace the use of ‘Chinese Taipei’ with ‘Taiwan’ across all Washington’s federal agencies A group of US House of Representatives lawmakers has introduced legislation to replace the term “Chinese Taipei” with “Taiwan” across all federal agencies. US Representative Byron Donalds announced the introduction of the “America supports Taiwan act,” which would mandate federal agencies adopt “Taiwan” in place of “Chinese Taipei,” a news release on his page on the US House of Representatives’ Web site said. US representatives Mike Collins, Barry Moore and Tom Tiffany are cosponsors of the legislation, US political newspaper The Hill reported yesterday. “The legislation is a push to normalize the position of Taiwan as an autonomous country, although the official US
CHANGE OF TONE: G7 foreign ministers dropped past reassurances that there is no change in the position of the G7 members on Taiwan, including ‘one China’ policies G7 foreign ministers on Friday took a tough stance on China, stepping up their language on Taiwan and omitting some conciliatory references from past statements, including to “one China” policies. A statement by ministers meeting in Canada mirrored last month’s Japan-US statement in condemning “coercion” toward Taiwan. Compared with a G7 foreign ministers’ statement in November last year, the statement added members’ concerns over China’s nuclear buildup, although it omitted references to their concerns about Beijing’s human rights abuses in Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong. Also missing were references stressing the desire for “constructive and stable relations with China” and
‘CROWN JEWEL’: Washington ‘can delay and deter’ Chinese President Xi Jinping’s plans for Taiwan, but it is ‘a very delicate situation there,’ the secretary of state said US President Donald Trump is opposed to any change to Taiwan’s “status quo” by force or extortion and would maintain that policy, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told the Hugh Hewitt Show host on Wednesday. The US’ policy is to maintain Taiwan’s “status quo” and to oppose any changes in the situation by force or extortion, Rubio said. Hewitt asked Rubio about the significance of Trump earlier this month speaking with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (台積電) chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家) at the White House, a meeting that Hewitt described as a “big deal.” Asked whether the meeting was an indication of the
RSS