Robb Woldman was driving his new electric vehicle on a Los Angeles sidewalk when a police officer tried to ticket him. But Woldman was acting in compliance with California law, and the law in 44 other states, which allows his vehicle, the Segway Human Transporter, to be driven on the sidewalk.
"The officer had to make four phone calls before he found out that I wasn't doing anything wrong," Woldman said.
"He had never seen a Segway before," Woldman said.
PHOTO: NY TIMES
That's not surprising given how few Segways have been sold since it became available to consumers last November.
When it was developed and financed during the heady technology boom, the Segway seemed like a sure thing with its ingenious technology. Since then many dot-com era ventures have failed. And Segway, though it survives, has to prove that it can last as a real business, and not just as a cool idea.
With five gyroscopes, two tilt sensors, dual redundant motors and 10 microprocessors, the transporter, which can travel at up to 20kph, is a diminutive object of envy in an age of Hummers and Lincoln Navigators. Ride one, and neighbors gather to try it and drivers pull over to watch when people like Woldman take to the sidewalk.
But despite its appeal, industry observers and Dean Kamen, Segway's inventor, agree that Segway LLC, which is privately held and does not release sales figures, is not anywhere near selling the 40,000 units that the company's factory in Bedford, New Hampshire, is capable of producing each month.
The company began commercial production of the vehicle in April 2002 and started taking public orders late last year. By then, the economy was shrinking, unemployment was up, and technology spending of all sorts was down.
In the last year, the company has sharply lowered its sales expectations, hoping the market will grow eventually.
The US$5,000 price tag is a factor in modest demand. A somewhat cheaper, scaled-down model is due out shortly, but its currently undisclosed price is expected to remain high for most consumers.
And it's not just price that is keeping sales low, critics argue. Rather, they say, while the machine is elegant and fun, it does not provide a real nonpolluting transportation alternative for the masses.
"I think of the Segway like a Jeopardy question. What is the question to which Segway is the answer?" asked Herman B. Leonard, a professor of public management at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School. For the Segway to be a success, he said, riders needed room to maneuver and confidence that the battery will not die on the return trip.
"Unless you are elderly or have limited mobility, why wouldn't you use a bike?" he asked.
Yet the fact that bicycles have not flooded American cities is a good indication that a new technology is needed, argues Kamen.
"People now use cars because they don't have viable options," he said.
"The Segway gives people an alternative to contributing to a polluted environment cluttered with automobiles," he said.
Investor optimism
Early on, investors whose expectations were driven by boom-era optimism believed the transporter would become a huge seller almost instantly. John Doerr, a venture capitalist, said in 2000 the Segway was "as big as the Internet, as far as making a difference," recounts Steve Kemper in his book Code Name Ginger. Doerr predicted that the company could earn US$500 billion in profits three to five years after sales began, Kemper was told.
Segway received US$88 million in private investment, with Doerr's company, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, and Credit Suisse First Boston Equity Partners, each investing US$38 million and other private investors putting in US$12 million, according to Kemper.
But the company incorrectly positioned the product, said Karl Ulrich, associate professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School and author of a textbook on product design.
A better stroll
"By putting Segways on sidewalks, the company is saying their transporter is just like walking, but better. That implies the device is for 2.5km to 3.2km trips. That is not a great market niche," said Ulrich, who founded a now-defunct electric bicycle and scooter company.
"To feel safe, people will travel half the stated range of a device, and users won't stand more than 10 or 15 minutes at a time," Ulrich said. "There could be a good market for the product if it cost US$1,000, but there is so much technology in the device that that could be impossible."
Using redundant computing and sensing systems to independently drive and balance each wheel means that Segway's parts alone cost the company at least US$1,500, Ulrich believes.
"I don't see how they can charge customers less than US$3,000 for this design," he said, noting that simpler alternatives like electric scooters could cost a third that price.
While not confirming his costs, Kamen agrees that a substantial price drop is not imminent. The public should think of the cost of Segway technology akin to that of a car, rather than, say, that of personal computers.
"Electronics prices drop, but cars do not get cheaper," he said. "Could we design and engineer a lower price point? Sure, but this could take years."
Ulrich believes that considerable time will be needed for success. "With the exception of Viagra, there are zero instances of new technologies taking off in just three or four years," he said.
Globalizing
Even with the company's modest sales, it can continue to develop a less-expensive model for a worldwide market, said Michael Schmertzler, a Segway director and chairman of the Credit Suisse investment committee.
"No one sees this generation of product as a solution for emerging markets," he said.
"Can we wait for several years for Segway to be a financial success? Within reason, we can wait," he said.
For now, early reports indicate that the Segway is well received in a number of government agencies. Seattle water meter readers have been testing 10 Segways since last September. Based on fuel prices and other factors, the cost-benefit ratio of using a Segway compared with a standard gasoline-powered vehicle is greater than 2 to 1, according to Matt Rathke, an engineer at the city's Fleets and Facilities Department.
"We do see benefits to using a Segway, and we will buy five more," Rathke said.
"But we won't just throw money to the wind by buying a fleet of them," he said.
Since mid-July, the New York City Police Department has had 30 foot patrol officers using Segways to cover their regular beats in Coney Island, Central Park, Times Square and other locations. "When it's not raining, it's ideal for the park. The officers have been very positive about using them," said Inspector Michael Coan, a police department spokesperson.
In Los Angeles, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority police has found the Segway useful.
"It's good for officers. Standing on the Segway makes them look 8 inches taller, and they can cover two to three times the area they could otherwise," noted Robin Blair, a transportation planner with the transit authority.
"This is the first generation Segway; like the first PC, it's a nice toy and it can solve some problems," Blair said.
Later this year, the California Department of Transportation will sponsor a rental test in Pleasant Hill, a city in the Bay area. Commuters will be able to rent a Segway to ride to the BART train station in the morning.
Kamen continues to believe that his device will eventually become a major part of the answer to transportation problems, even if it takes longer than he and others thought a few years back, when new technologies and ventures seemed to be blessed by the gods.
"I'd like to think that the Segway will become a piece of our infrastructure. Every new technology starts out as a novelty, and then things usually turn out differently than expected," Kamen said.
Nvidia Corp yesterday unveiled its new high-speed interconnect technology, NVLink Fusion, with Taiwanese application-specific IC (ASIC) designers Alchip Technologies Ltd (世芯) and MediaTek Inc (聯發科) among the first to adopt the technology to help build semi-custom artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure for hyperscalers. Nvidia has opened its technology to outside users, as hyperscalers and cloud service providers are building their own cost-effective AI chips, or accelerators, used in AI servers by leveraging ASIC firms’ designing capabilities to reduce their dependence on Nvidia. Previously, NVLink technology was only available for Nvidia’s own AI platform. “NVLink Fusion opens Nvidia’s AI platform and rich ecosystem for
‘WORLD’S LOSS’: Taiwan’s exclusion robs the world of the benefits it could get from one of the foremost practitioners of disease prevention and public health, Minister Chiu said Taiwan should be allowed to join the World Health Assembly (WHA) as an irreplaceable contributor to global health and disease prevention efforts, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said yesterday. He made the comment at a news conference in Taipei, hours before a Taiwanese delegation was to depart for Geneva, Switzerland, seeking to meet with foreign representatives for a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the WHA, the WHO’s annual decisionmaking meeting, which would be held from Monday next week to May 27. As of yesterday, Taiwan had yet to receive an invitation. Taiwan has much to offer to the international community’s
CAUSE AND EFFECT: China’s policies prompted the US to increase its presence in the Indo-Pacific, and Beijing should consider if this outcome is in its best interests, Lai said China has been escalating its military and political pressure on Taiwan for many years, but should reflect on this strategy and think about what is really in its best interest, President William Lai (賴清德) said. Lai made the remark in a YouTube interview with Mindi World News that was broadcast on Saturday, ahead of the first anniversary of his presidential inauguration tomorrow. The US has clearly stated that China is its biggest challenge and threat, with US President Donald Trump and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth repeatedly saying that the US should increase its forces in the Indo-Pacific region
ALL TOGETHER: Only by including Taiwan can the WHA fully exemplify its commitment to ‘One World for Health,’ the representative offices of eight nations in Taiwan said The representative offices in Taiwan of eight nations yesterday issued a joint statement reiterating their support for Taiwan’s meaningful engagement with the WHO and for Taipei’s participation as an observer at the World Health Assembly (WHA). The joint statement came as Taiwan has not received an invitation to this year’s WHA, which started yesterday and runs until Tuesday next week. This year’s meeting of the decisionmaking body of the WHO in Geneva, Switzerland, would be the ninth consecutive year Taiwan has been excluded. The eight offices, which reaffirmed their support for Taiwan, are the British Office Taipei, the Australian Office Taipei, the