Sun, Nov 03, 2002 page12

• Global issues flow into Berkeley's coffee

  • By Kim Bendheim / NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  A buzz in California has caught the attention of the world's biggest coffee companies.

  In a growing movement reminiscent of the grape boycott in the 1970s, anti-globalization and human rights advocates in California have been promoting the purchase of Fair Trade certified coffee -- coffee that guarantees a so-called living wage to poor coffee farmers in developing countries. An estimated 25 million of these farmers have suffered because raw coffee prices have fallen below the cost of production.

  Students in California have helped to pressure the Sara Lee Corp, the maker of the Hills Bros. and Chock Full o' Nuts brands, to start buying small amounts of Fair Trade coffee. On Nov. 5, voters in Berkeley, California, a longtime redoubt of student activism, will vote on a measure that would require the city's restaurants and supermarket cafes to restrict sales of brewed coffee to blends that are Fair Trade, organic or shade grown, which are considered more environmentally friendly than conventional, mass-produced varieties. Violators could face US$100 fines and six-month jail terms.

  

  Rick Young, 36-year-old rookie lawyer out of the University of Berkeley law school, has made it his mission that every cafe, every diner, every restaurant, every 7-Eleven and every bake sale serve only Fair-Trade certified coffee -- coffee that guarantees a so-called living wage for small farmers in developing countries.

  PHOTO: NY TIMES

  Major coffee companies have denounced the Berkeley measure. But at least one, Procter & Gamble, which sells the Folger's brand, said it would work with beverage servers to comply if the measure passed.

  Fair Trade coffee, a pet project of the anti-globalization movement, has become a growing segment of the US$55 billion coffee industry. Although Fair Trade coffee is only about 2 percent of the global supply, sales rose 36 percent last year in the US, the biggest single market for coffee. About 7,000 retail outlets across the country sell Fair Trade coffee, according to TransFair USA, a nonprofit group in Oakland, California, that monitors food company compliance with Fair Trade standards.

  Last week, Green Mountain Coffee, a wholesaler in Waterbury, Vermont, signed an agreement to sell Fair Trade coffee under the Newman's Own Organics label, the food company owned by the actor Paul Newman, next year in supermarkets nationwide.

  The economic argument for Fair Trade coffee got a lift in September when Oxfam, the British charity, released a report saying that a global oversupply of coffee had pushed prices to their lowest levels in 100 years, adjusted for inflation, impoverishing millions of coffee farmers in developing countries.

  In Latin America, Africa and Asia, the report said, farmers are paid roughly US$0.24 a pound for beans, while the four multinational companies that buy nearly half of the world's coffee -- Sara Lee, Kraft, Procter & Gamble and Nestl? -- sell those beans at an average price of US$3.60 a pound and "are laughing all the way to the bank."

  Fair Trade coffee, which can cost more than double the price of conventional blends at the checkout counter, is comparable in quality and price with premium blends.

  Small farmer cooperatives are guaranteed to receive about US$1.25 a pound for Fair Trade coffee.

  To help these farmers, Oxfam proposed to the International Coffee Organization, a group of 40 major importers and exporters, that it cut the oversupply, and help raise prices, by destroying stockpiles of the lowest-quality beans.

  Organization members generally oppose that approach, arguing that stimulating demand is a better way to raise price than reducing supply. Many also reject the Fair Trade approach, saying it supports prices artificially and could worsen the glut.

  "Fair Trade isn't a viable solution," said Gordon Gillet, Nestl?'s senior vice president for purchasing and exports. "First, it favors the few and, secondly, it provides an incentive to farmers to increase coffee production at a time when they should perhaps be seriously considering alternative crops."

  Anneke Theunissen, a spokeswoman for Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International, the group that oversees Fair Trade certification, disagreed. "At this moment, Fair Trade labeling is the only way for the disadvantaged small farmers to survive in the market," she said.

  As for the Berkeley initiative, the industry has largely dismissed it as a quirky extreme, saying customers should decide what coffee they want.

  "Berkeley has always distinguished itself, to put it politely, by a surprising originality," said Francois-Xavier Perroud, a Nestl? spokesman.

  Berkeley, though, may be a natural place for the coffee controversy to percolate. The city is known as a coffee Mecca where couples go to coffee houses on dates rather than to bars, and where drinkers debate the merits of one roast over another the way the French debate the merits of wines. Peet's Coffee & Tea, a famous Berkeley roaster, was the training ground for the founders of Starbucks, the biggest and most successful coffee bar chain in the world. Both were early sellers of Fair Trade beans, along with other coffees.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Taiwan and the US preparing a ‘hellscape’ strategy

  • 2

    Two questioned over DPP legislator recall forgery

  • 3

    Taobao fined NT$1.2m for unauthorized advertising

  • 4

    Taobao fined over ads, risks losing license: ministry

  • 5

    Taiwan, Tuvalu sign agreements on labor cooperation