As an American, a New Yorker by birth and a resident of Washington DC until a month ago, Tuesday's terrorist attacks were especially surreal for me.
That I still don't know how many friends or family members I lost back home is one reason. So is knowing that tens of thousands of people, some of whom I may have shared subway cars and taxis with, may have lost their lives. Seeing landmarks in cities I hold dear reduced to rubble hardly helps.
Viewing the carnage from 12,800km to the east, I was struck -- and a bit embarrassed -- by how much I wanted to be there. By how much I longed to be in New York, experiencing this awful act along with citizens of a place I still consider home. Not that I could've done anything to help, but to understand what happened. To comprehend it in some way. If that's even possible.
PHOTO: AFP
I was equally struck -- and a bit disturbed -- by how much I cared about the terrorists' New York target. It's a building, for heaven's sake. It's the victims that matter, I remind myself. Forget the columns and beams.
Yet the World Trade Center wasn't just a building, but a symbol of America. It was the heart of the US economy and soul of the capitalist world. The further you're away from home, the clearer that becomes. Hence the attempt by terrorists to topple the twin towers in 1993. And hence the extremes -- hijacking commercial jets and crashing them into the 110-story structures -- to which terrorists went to finish the job this time around.
Those who sent the towers to the ground not only succeeded in changing life as we know it for Americans, but also their lifestyles -- at least in the short run. If there were ever a push strong enough to thrust an economy into recession, the US saw it yesterday.
The human toll of the attacks on New York and Washington will take time to sort out. So will the economic effects. But for an economy already teetering on the edge of recession, the horror of seeing the World Trade Center crumble and the Pentagon burn could very well tip the US into contraction.
That fallout will be felt far beyond US shores. The American economy accounts for a quarter of global trade, something investors had in mind yesterday when they sent the Nikkei stock average as low as the Dow Jones Industrial Average for the first time since 1957. The selling reflected fears the attacks will devastate global growth.
It's a rational fear at an entirely irrational moment in world history. US consumers are the glue holding together a fragile US economy. With scenes of planes flying into national landmarks filling television screens, it's doubtful Americans are thinking about shopping. That's where the trouble begins.
Consumer behavior is as much about psychology as economics. A family in Cleveland may not feel safe flying to California for vacation. Joe Six-Pack in Peoria, Illinois may not feel financially secure enough to visit auto dealerships this weekend to look at SUVs. Folks in Seattle may think twice about buying that new home.
People in New York may not be eating out very much in the weeks ahead. Once consumers stop spending, the US falters.
Nowhere will the closing of American wallets be felt more than here in Asia. Japan, for example, is pinning its hopes on an export-led economic recovery. Tokyo is actively trying to weaken the yen versus the US dollar to boost demand for Japanese goods abroad.
The rest of Asia also is hoping to export its way out of recession.
But if the US hits a wall -- which is far more possible today than yesterday -- Asia will have to look elsewhere. That risk grows if the Dow follows the Nikkei's lead and plunges when New York markets reopen tomorrow. Some analysts are even buzzing about a Federal Reserve rate cut as soon as yesterday. The move would be aimed at calming fears about a US meltdown.
US Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill, who was stranded here in Tokyo earlier yesterday, already is going through the motions. "In the face of [Tuesday's] tragedy, the financial system functioned extraordinarily well, and I have every confidence that it will continue to do so in the days ahead," said O'Neill, who called US financial markets "strong and resilient."
Such reassurances are coming in Asia too. The Bank of Japan today added an extra ?2 trillion (US$16.8 billion) to the world's second-biggest economy. The move was aimed at keeping markets functioning smoothly. Central bankers from Australia to Hong Kong to Korea to Singapore pledged to do the same. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand also is keeping tabs on things.
It's comforting to see policymakers are awake at the controls.
Economics courses don't include much instruction on dealing with the financial repercussions of terrorist attacks. Perhaps they'll begin to, considering officials are now faced with those very challenges as never before. For not only has the world changed in the last 24 hours, but so has the range of variables economic authorities need to keep on their radar screens.
In the meanwhile, we here in Asia will keep victims and families in New York and Washington in our thoughts. I can't speak for everyone, but my heart is certainly 12,800km away from Tokyo at the moment.
CELEBRATION: The PRC turned 75 on Oct. 1, but the Republic of China is older. The PRC could never be the homeland of the people of the ROC, Lai said The People’s Republic of China (PRC) could not be the “motherland” of the people of the Republic of China (ROC), President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday. Lai made the remarks in a speech at a Double Ten National Day gala in Taipei, which is part of National Day celebrations that are to culminate in a fireworks display in Yunlin County on Thursday night next week. Lai wished the country a happy birthday and called on attendees to enjoy the performances and activities while keeping in mind that the ROC is a sovereign and independent nation. He appealed for everyone to always love their
‘EXTREME PRESSURE’: Beijing’s goal is to ‘force Taiwan to make mistakes,’ Admiral Tang Hua said, adding that mishaps could serve as ‘excuses’ for launching a blockade China’s authoritarian expansionism threatens not only Taiwan, but the rules-based international order, the navy said yesterday, after its top commander said in an interview that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could blockade the nation at will. The object of Beijing’s expansionist activities is not limited to Taiwan and its use of pressure is not confined to specific political groups or people, the navy said in a statement. China utilizes a mixture of cognitive warfare and “gray zone” military activities to pressure Taiwan, the navy said, adding that PLA sea and air forces are compressing the nation’s defensive depth. The navy continues to
MAKING PROGRESS: Officials and industry leaders who participated in a defense forum last month agreed that Taiwan has the capabilities to work with the US, the report said Taiwan’s high-tech defense industry is to enhance collaboration with the US to produce weapons needed for self-defense, the Ministry of National Defense said in a report to the Legislative Yuan. Deputy Minister of National Defense Hsu Yen-pu (徐衍璞) discussed building regional and global industry alliances with US partners at the US-Taiwan Defense Industry Conference in Philadelphia held from Sept. 22 to Tuesday last week, the ministry said in the declassified portion of the report. The visit contributed to maintaining bilateral ties, facilitated Taiwan’s efforts to acquire weapons and equipment, and strengthened the resilience of the two nation’s defense industries, it said. Taiwan-US ties
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering