Nippon Steel Corp and US Steel Corp yesterday filed suit over US President Joe Biden’s decision to block the Japanese giant’s proposed acquisition of its American rival, accusing his administration of “illegal interference” in the huge transaction.
The companies said in a statement that they initiated the legal action in the US court of appeals in Washington challenging the review process for the acquisition, claiming Biden, who is leaving office on Jan. 20, had improperly used his influence and blocked the deal “for purely political reasons.”
The companies filed their lawsuits “to remedy the ongoing illegal interference with Nippon Steel’s acquisition of US Steel,” they said, adding that the litigation intends to show that “President Biden ignored the rule of law to gain favor with (workers’ unions) and support his political agenda.”
Photo: Kazuhiro Nogi, AFP
Biden had criticized the US$14.9 billion deal for months, while holding off on a move that could hurt ties with Tokyo.
But the outgoing president — who made the rebuilding of the US manufacturing base a major goal of his administration — announced on Friday that he was blocking the acquisition, saying it threatened national security.
The announcement drew sharp criticism from both companies and Tokyo.
The companies said the body reviewing the deal, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), “failed to conduct a good faith, national security-focused regulatory review process.”
The steelmakers are asking the courts to order a new review of the proposed merger.
Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba yesterday urged Washington to dispel concerns that Biden’s block of the deal could impact future investments.
The transaction was a prominent element of last year’s presidential campaign, given US Steel’s ties to Pennsylvania, a politically critical battleground state and cradle of the American steel industry.
In an interview with Nikkei business daily, Nippon Steel vice chairman Takahiro Mori said his company “will not back down after being treated unreasonably. We will fight tooth and nail.”
The CFIUS review process “lacked integrity,” he said, adding that “the decision was left to the president (Biden) without any substantive consultation” with the companies.
HORMUZ ISSUE: The US president said he expected crude prices to drop at the end of the war, which he called a ‘minor excursion’ that could continue ‘for a little while’ The United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Kuwait started reducing oil production, as the near-closure of the crucial Strait of Hormuz ripples through energy markets and affects global supply. Abu Dhabi National Oil Co (ADNOC) is “managing offshore production levels to address storage requirements,” the company said in a statement, without giving details. Kuwait Petroleum Corp said it was lowering production at its oil fields and refineries after “Iranian threats against safe passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz.” The war in the Middle East has all but closed Hormuz, the narrow waterway linking the Persian Gulf to the open seas,
Nanya Technology Corp (南亞科技) yesterday said the DRAM supply crunch could extend through 2028, as the artificial intelligence (AI) boom has led the world’s major memory makers to dramatically reduce production of standard DRAM and allocate a significant portion of their capacity for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips. The most severe supply constraints would stretch to the first half of next year due to “very limited” increases in new DRAM capacity worldwide, Nanya Technology president Lee Pei-ing (李培瑛) told a news briefing. The company plans to increase monthly 12-inch wafer capacity to 20,000 in the first half of 2028 after a
Taiwan has enough crude oil reserves for more than 100 days and sufficient natural gas reserves for more than 11 days, both above the regulatory safety requirement, Minister of Economic Affairs Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) said yesterday, adding that the government would prioritize domestic price stability as conflicts in the Middle East continue. Overall, energy supply for this month is secure, and the government is continuing efforts to ensure sufficient supply for next month, Kung told reporters after meeting with representatives from business groups at the ministry in Taipei. The ministry has been holding daily cross-ministry meetings at the Executive Yuan to ensure
RATIONING: The proposal would give the Trump administration ample leverage to negotiate investments in the US as it decides how many chips to give each country US officials are debating a new regulatory framework for exporting artificial intelligence (AI) chips and are considering requiring foreign nations to invest in US AI data centers or security guarantees as a condition for granting exports of 200,000 chips or more, according to a document seen by Reuters. The rules are not yet final and could change. They would be the first attempt to regulate the flow of AI chips to US allies and partners since US President Donald Trump’s administration said it rescinded its predecessor’s so-called AI diffusion rules. Those rules sought to keep a significant amount of AI