From Albert Einstein’s notes to a record-breaking Frida Kahlo to a 6.6 million euro (US$6.79 million) triceratops — auction houses have lately seen a string of record-breaking items going under the hammer and through the roof.
Valuations are becoming hard to judge.
On Wednesday, the Einstein manuscript went for 11.3 million euros in Paris, five times its expected price.
Photo: AFP
That came just days after a storyboard for the failed 1970s film version of Dune sparked a bidding war that pushed the price 100 times above the valuation to 2.7 million euros.
NEW INTEREST
Market watcher Artprice credits a transition to online sales for sparking new levels of interest, particularly in the US and Asia.
“The auction houses were very behind the times, but COVID forced them to modernize and the result is that online sales have been spectacular and have attracted a new audience,” Artprice founder Thierry Ehrmann said.
Many dynamics are changing, he said, giving the example of 30-somethings who prefer to collect art than buy their first home.
After an initial freeze as the COVID-19 pandemic took hold last year, online auctions exploded later in the year as millions hunted for new ways to kill time and spend money during lockdowns.
With stock markets soaring in the pandemic, the rich got significantly richer, while struggling to find ways to spend it. This has helped push the old masters to new heights. This month alone in New York, a Van Gogh went for US$71.3 million and a Kahlo self-portrait set a new record for the Mexican artist’s work at nearly US$35 million.
However, it has also created a hunger for almost anything collectable, from Michael Jordan sneakers (US$1.5 million), to an original copy of the US constitution (US$43 million) to an 800,000 euro bottle of Burgundy wine.
“At a time when many art fairs can’t happen in person and online viewing rooms are awful, auctions have become a predominant form of selling,” Anna Brady, art markets reporter for The Arts Newspaper, said on its podcast.
Brady highlighted the infusion of cash from a new source: crypto-millionaires. They have expanded from an initial focus on digital art — such as the mind-boggling US$69 million paid for a JPG file by one of its pioneers, Beeple, in March — into more traditional tastes.
Crypto “whale” Justin Sun has bought works by Pablo Picasso and Andy Warhol this year, and paid US$78.4 million for Alberto Giacometti’s The Nose sculpture this month.
Sun then triggered a lot of harrumphing among stuffed shirts of the art world by boasting about his purchase on Twitter — breaching their traditional codes of secrecy and discretion in a way that suggests an even more competitive market to come.
BUBBLE?
Is it all a bubble? It is a question that has been raised before, especially in the 1980s when the art market looked in danger of overheating under the pressure of a new generation of yuppies trying to flash their cash.
However, despite several cooling-off periods — including the 2008 financial crash and a sharp drop between 2015 and 2019 — the overall trend has been skyward.
Artprice says the contemporary art market has grown from US$103 million in 2000 to US$2.7 billion today.
“Buying and re-selling has become much more natural: to refine one’s collection, or following a divorce, or because our tastes have changed,” Ehrmann said.
Deloitte estimated last year that the uber-rich own US$1.45 trillion of art and collectables.
For these people, Ehrmann said, “there’s no longer a psychological barrier to paying more than a million dollars for something online.”
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known
A move by US President Donald Trump to slap a 25 percent tariff on all steel imports is expected to place Taiwan-made steel, which already has a 25 percent tariff, on an equal footing, the Taiwan Steel & Iron Industries Association said yesterday. Speaking with CNA, association chairman Hwang Chien-chih (黃建智) said such an equal footing is expected to boost Taiwan’s competitive edge against other countries in the US market, describing the tariffs as "positive" for Taiwanese steel exporters. On Monday, Trump signed two executive orders imposing the new metal tariffs on imported steel and aluminum with no exceptions and exemptions, effective