India’s new rules for foreign investment contravene WTO principles of non-discrimination, and are against free and fair trade, a Chinese embassy spokesperson said yesterday, potentially opening a new flashpoint in the nations’ uneasy ties.
India on Saturday stepped up scrutiny of investments from companies based in neighboring nations, in what was widely seen as a move to stave off takeovers by Chinese firms during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The changes to federal rules on investment were meant to curb opportunistic takeovers and acquisitions, the Indian government said, but it did not mention China in its policy statement.
In a global rout triggered by the pandemic and the imposition of national lockdown measures, Indian stock markets have fallen 25 percent since Feb. 15, wiping out tens of billions of dollars.
“The impact of the policy on Chinese investors is clear,” Chinese embassy in New Delhi spokesman Ji Rong (嵇蓉) said in a statement.
As of December last year, China’s cumulative investment in India has exceeded US$8 billion, far more than the total investments of India’s other neighboring nations, the statement said.
The move could set back attempts by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) to improve ties between the two nations, which fought a war over border issues in 1962.
China hopes the Indian government would revise its “discriminatory practices” and treat investments from different nations equally, Ji said.
Some experts said that the move could hurt the trade relationship between the two nations as it is clear that the new policy is directed toward Chinese investment.
“It appears that the [Indian] government feels that if China’s money-pumping goes unchecked, it could have [a] drastic impact on [the] ownership of assets in the country,” said Nikhil Narendran, a partner in Indian law firm Trilegal.
“This will definitely have trade implications,” Narendran said, adding it could also make it harder for Indian start-ups to raise money.
Taiwan’s technology protection rules prohibits Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) from producing 2-nanometer chips abroad, so the company must keep its most cutting-edge technology at home, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. Kuo made the remarks in response to concerns that TSMC might be forced to produce advanced 2-nanometer chips at its fabs in Arizona ahead of schedule after former US president Donald Trump was re-elected as the next US president on Tuesday. “Since Taiwan has related regulations to protect its own technologies, TSMC cannot produce 2-nanometer chips overseas currently,” Kuo said at a meeting of the legislature’s
GEOPOLITICAL ISSUES? The economics ministry said that political factors should not affect supply chains linking global satellite firms and Taiwanese manufacturers Elon Musk’s Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) asked Taiwanese suppliers to transfer manufacturing out of Taiwan, leading to some relocating portions of their supply chain, according to sources employed by and close to the equipment makers and corporate documents. A source at a company that is one of the numerous subcontractors that provide components for SpaceX’s Starlink satellite Internet products said that SpaceX asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan because of geopolitical risks, pushing at least one to move production to Vietnam. A second source who collaborates with Taiwanese satellite component makers in the nation said that suppliers were directly
Top Taiwanese officials yesterday moved to ease concern about the potential fallout of Donald Trump’s return to the White House, making a case that the technology restrictions promised by the former US president against China would outweigh the risks to the island. The prospect of Trump’s victory in this week’s election is a worry for Taipei given the Republican nominee in the past cast doubt over the US commitment to defend it from Beijing. But other policies championed by Trump toward China hold some appeal for Taiwan. National Development Council Minister Paul Liu (劉鏡清) described the proposed technology curbs as potentially having
EXPORT CONTROLS: US lawmakers have grown more concerned that the US Department of Commerce might not be aggressively enforcing its chip restrictions The US on Friday said it imposed a US$500,000 penalty on New York-based GlobalFoundries Inc, the world’s third-largest contract chipmaker, for shipping chips without authorization to an affiliate of blacklisted Chinese chipmaker Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC, 中芯). The US Department of Commerce in a statement said GlobalFoundries sent 74 shipments worth US$17.1 million to SJ Semiconductor Corp (盛合晶微半導體), an affiliate of SMIC, without seeking a license. Both SMIC and SJ Semiconductor were added to the department’s trade restriction Entity List in 2020 over SMIC’s alleged ties to the Chinese military-industrial complex. SMIC has denied wrongdoing. Exports to firms on the list