China’s financial regulator said it would implement a series of measures to shore up the nation’s troubled smaller banks and insurers, while continuing a clampdown on shadow financing and property speculation.
The regulator would introduce measures to eliminate bad loans and promote mergers, capital injections and the restructuring of high-risk institutions, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) said in a statement on Friday.
Other steps include setting up a resolution fund and bridge banks, while introducing new investors and allowing market-oriented exits, it said.
Many of China’s 3,000 small banks are coping with a mountain of bad loans, prompting the government to crack down on risky funding practices. Small, troubled banks pose a risk to the Chinese economy, which is already growing at its weakest pace since the early 1990s.
The watchdog would gradually lower the risks of shadow financing by reducing noncompliant investments in nonstandard assets, while insurance institutions would clean up multilayered investment and leveraged transactions between related parties, the CBIRC said.
The CBIRC would also increase risk management in areas such as real estate, make sure that housing deals are not for speculation and prevent capital from flowing illegally into property markets.
Moreover, it would continue to resolve the hidden debt risk of local government bonds.
Meanwhile, China’s central bank pledged more financial support for small and micro businesses while saying that it plans to stick to a prudent monetary policy stance this year.
The People’s Bank of China would improve the incentive mechanism for lending to such companies, it said in a statement following a two-day work conference in Beijing.
Authorities would make it easier for them to gain access to financing through targeted reserve cuts, relending and rediscounting, among other policy tools, it said.
Separately, the Chinese State Administration of Foreign Exchange said it would diversify policy tools to counter the impact from external shocks on the country’s trade and investment, international balance of payment and cross-border capital flows.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday said that its investment plan in Arizona is going according to schedule, following a local media report claiming that the company is planning to break ground on its third wafer fab in the US in June. In a statement, TSMC said it does not comment on market speculation, but that its investments in Arizona are proceeding well. TSMC is investing more than US$65 billion in Arizona to build three advanced wafer fabs. The first one has started production using the 4-nanometer (nm) process, while the second one would start mass production using the
US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose up to 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan’s semiconductor exports to the US to encourage chip manufacturers to move their production facilities to the US, but experts are questioning his strategy, warning it could harm industries on both sides. “I’m very confused and surprised that the Trump administration would try and do this,” Bob O’Donnell, chief analyst and founder of TECHnalysis Research in California, said in an interview with the Central News Agency on Wednesday. “It seems to reflect the fact that they don’t understand how the semiconductor industry really works,” O’Donnell said. Economic sanctions would