US Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell and his colleagues are loathe to follow Europe and Japan into negative interest rate territory — no matter what US President Donald Trump might want or how bad the US economy might get.
Not only could such a move be deemed illegal, it is also unclear how much of an economic gain it would yield given the likely disruption it could cause to banks and money market funds.
“I don’t see negative interest rates being a very useful part of our arsenal,” Fed Governor Lael Brainard said in a televised interview with Yahoo Finance in June.
Photo: Reuters
Trump on Wednesday urged the Fed to “get our interest rates down to zero or less,” arguing in a tweet that the move would allow the US government to bring the cost of servicing its debt “way down.”
The tweet came a day before the European Central Bank (ECB) cut its deposit rate by 10 basis points to minus-0.5 percent, a penalty rate that pushes banks to lend excess cash.
The ECB also said it would restart its bond-buying stimulus program, which pumps newly created money into the financial system to lower borrowing costs and help the economy. It is to buy 20 billion euros (US$22 billion) per month in government and corporate bonds for as long as needed.
It also extended its promise to keep rates at record lows until inflation has “robustly” converged on its goal of just less than 2 percent.
With unemployment near a half-century low and the economy still expanding, the Fed is a long way from slashing rates to zero or below.
However, it is widely expected to cut rates by 0.25 percentage points next week to a range of 1.75 to 2 percent in response to muted inflation and slowing global growth.
The more pertinent question is whether the Fed would push rates into negative territory if the US economy tumbles into a recession.
Based on policymakers’ public and private comments, the answer is probably not.
Instead, they would look to other tools — such as large-scale bond purchases and forward interest-rate guidance — to try to provide the economy with a needed boost.
Negative rates are “way down the list of things that they would do,” Johns Hopkins University professor and former Fed economist Jonathan Wright said.
The gains are limited, while the political fallout — Trump to the contrary — could be large.
When the Fed in 2008 reduced rates to a range of zero to 0.25 percent and kept them there for seven years, it was frequently criticized by lawmakers for short-changing savers.
The Fed is in the midst of a wide-ranging strategic study of ways it could tackle what Powell has called the “key question” facing it: How could it best manage the ups and downs of the economy in a world of permanently lower interest rates?
However, negative rates do not seem to be high on the agenda. A listing of Fed research relevant to the review on the central bank’s Web site does not include a section on negative rates, JPMorgan Chase & Co chief US economist Michael Feroli said.
What is more, two of the academic papers presented at a Chicago Fed conference on the review — including one coauthored by Wright — cast doubt on how effective they can be.
Additional reporting by AP
Three experts in the high technology industry have said that US President Donald Trump’s pledge to impose higher tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors is part of an effort to force Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to the negotiating table. In a speech to Republicans on Jan. 27, Trump said he intends to impose tariffs on Taiwan to bring chip production to the US. “The incentive is going to be they’re not going to want to pay a 25, 50 or even a 100 percent tax,” he said. Darson Chiu (邱達生), an economics professor at Taichung-based Tunghai University and director-general of
‘LEGACY CHIPS’: Chinese companies have dramatically increased mature chip production capacity, but the West’s drive for secure supply chains offers a lifeline for Taiwan When Powerchip Technology Corp (力晶科技) entered a deal with the eastern Chinese city of Hefei in 2015 to set up a new chip foundry, it hoped the move would help provide better access to the promising Chinese market. However, nine years later, that Chinese foundry, Nexchip Semiconductor Corp (合晶集成), has become one of its biggest rivals in the legacy chip space, leveraging steep discounts after Beijing’s localization call forced Powerchip to give up the once-lucrative business making integrated circuits for Chinese flat panels. Nexchip is among Chinese foundries quickly winning market share in the crucial US$56.3 billion industry of so-called legacy
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) is reportedly making another pass at Nissan Motor Co, as the Japanese automaker's tie-up with Honda Motor Co falls apart. Nissan shares rose as much as 6 percent after Taiwan’s Central News Agency reported that Hon Hai chairman Young Liu (劉揚偉) instructed former Nissan executive Jun Seki to connect with French carmaker Renault SA, which holds about 36 percent of Nissan’s stock. Hon Hai, the Taiwanese iPhone-maker also known as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), was exploring an investment or buyout of Nissan last year, but backed off in December after the Japanese carmaker penned a deal
WASHINGTON POLICY: Tariffs of 10 percent or more and other new costs are tipped to hit shipments of small parcels, cutting export growth by 1.3 percentage points The decision by US President Donald Trump to ban Chinese companies from using a US tariff loophole would hit tens of billions of dollars of trade and reduce China’s economic growth this year, according to new estimates by economists at Nomura Holdings Inc. According to Nomura’s estimates, last year companies such as Shein (希音) and PDD Holdings Inc’s (拼多多控股) Temu shipped US$46 billion of small parcels to the US to take advantage of the rule that allows items with a declared value under US$800 to enter the US tariff-free. Tariffs of 10 percent or more and other new costs would slash such