The government should set out concise and comprehensive marine policies as companies are rapidly developing offshore wind farms, Chiau Wen-yan (邱文彥), the former dean of National Taiwan Ocean University’s College of Ocean Law and Policy, said yesterday.
“At the moment, we do not have a clear framework for the [wind power] industry to develop within... The government tends to act first and ask questions later,” Chiau said at an event on the risks and prospects of the wind power industry.
He criticized the government’s rushed approvals of offshore wind farm projects, despite its lack of expertise in the area.
“This could pose a national security threat, as foreign developers and vessels enter our waters and uncover critical geological information,” he said, adding that wind turbines might also obstruct the functioning of radar detection systems.
“In the meantime, hundreds of wind turbines would not be regulated by the Coastal Zone Management Act (海岸管理法),” Chiau said.
The act, which is one of the few laws regulating coastal and marine space, might prove insufficient, as it only covers near-shore areas up to 3 nautical miles (5.6km) off the coastline, he said.
The government also turns a blind eye to environmental and ecological issues, Chiau said, citing the negative effects that the offshore wind farms would have on seabird populations and endangered marine species, such as the Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin.
“We must redefine our rapport with the ocean and its resources,” Chiau said.
He urged the government to formulate a clear marine spatial planning act based on cultural heritage and an ecosystem preservation approach.
The government under President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has been determined to go full steam ahead with wind farm projects to meet its target of phasing out nuclear power by 2025, but it has encountered strong headwinds from its own local content regulations.
The Industrial Development Bureau on Monday put on hold Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners’ (CIP) localization report, as the Danish firm reportedly failed to meet local supply chain requirements by half, according to the Chinese-language Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times).
CIP rejected the newspaper story, saying that it has reached most of the 27 requirements.
It also denied rumors that its main turbine supplier, MHI Vestas Offshore Wind A/S, had decided to pull its wind turbine assembly plant from Taiwan.
MHI Vestas signed contracts with local companies such as Chin Fong Machine Industrial Co (金豐機器工業) and Swancor Holding Co Ltd (上緯投控), while inking another contract with Mitsubishi Electric (Europe) Corp, which is to cooperate with Shihlin Electric & Engineering Corp (士林電機).
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday said that its investment plan in Arizona is going according to schedule, following a local media report claiming that the company is planning to break ground on its third wafer fab in the US in June. In a statement, TSMC said it does not comment on market speculation, but that its investments in Arizona are proceeding well. TSMC is investing more than US$65 billion in Arizona to build three advanced wafer fabs. The first one has started production using the 4-nanometer (nm) process, while the second one would start mass production using the
US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose up to 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan’s semiconductor exports to the US to encourage chip manufacturers to move their production facilities to the US, but experts are questioning his strategy, warning it could harm industries on both sides. “I’m very confused and surprised that the Trump administration would try and do this,” Bob O’Donnell, chief analyst and founder of TECHnalysis Research in California, said in an interview with the Central News Agency on Wednesday. “It seems to reflect the fact that they don’t understand how the semiconductor industry really works,” O’Donnell said. Economic sanctions would
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known