Cases of European firms forced to transfer technology in China are increasing, despite Beijing saying the problem does not exist, a European business lobby said yesterday, adding that its outlook on the country’s regulatory environment is “bleak.”
The EU Chamber of Commerce in China said that results from its annual survey showed that 20 percent of members reported being compelled to transfer technology for market access, up from 10 percent two years ago.
Nearly a quarter of those who reported such transfers said the practice was ongoing, while another 39 percent said transfers had occurred in the past two years.
“Unfortunately, our members have reported that compelled technology transfers not only persist, but that they happen at double the rate of two years ago,” Chamber vice president Charlotte Roule told a news briefing on the survey.
“It might be due to a number of reasons... Either way, it is unacceptable that this practice continues in a market as mature and innovative as China,” Roule said.
In certain “cutting edge” industries, the incidence of reported transfers was higher, such as 30 percent in chemicals and petroleum, 28 percent in medical devices and 27 percent in pharmaceuticals, she said.
China’s People’s Daily newspaper on Saturday wrote that Washington’s complaints on the issue were “fabricated from thin air.”
Amid the escalating US-China trade dispute, Beijing has put pressure on the EU to stand with it against US President Donald Trump’s trade policies, although the world’s largest trade bloc has largely rebuffed those efforts.
The EU has also become increasingly frustrated by what it sees as the slow pace of economic opening in China, even after years of granting China almost unfettered access to EU markets for trade and investment. However, European officials say publicly that they do not support the use of tariffs as a solution.
Trump earlier this month raised tariffs on US$200 billion of Chinese imports to 25 percent from 10 percent, and has said the duties are causing companies to move production out of China to Vietnam and other countries in Asia.
The majority of European firms in the chamber’s survey said that their business strategies were not changed by the trade dispute, although it was completed by 585 respondents in January and February, well before the US’ latest tariff increase.
At the time, 6 percent of respondents said they were moving or had moved production out of China as a result of the tariffs, while 4 percent said they were considering or had already decreased investment in China.
Forty-nine percent of the respondents affected by US tariffs said their companies had covered the cost themselves and kept prices the same.
The chamber said that members had a “bleak outlook” on China’s regulatory environment, with 72 percent of members saying they expected obstacles to increase or stay the same in the next five years, even as the Chinese government has vowed continued reform and opening.
STAYING AHEAD: Fitch said that TSMC remains technologically ahead of others, but Samsung is building a new chip fab, while China is investing in its domestic industry As escalating US-China tensions and COVID-19-related production disruptions force US technology supply chains to transform, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) US$12 billion chip fabrication plant in Arizona would be key to spurring greater US production of core semiconductor components, Fitch Ratings said. “We view the US-TSMC alliance as a first step in building a more autonomous US technology supply chain, given high barriers to entry, specifically related to the significant capital and design capability required for leading-edge semiconductor manufacturing,” Fitch said in a statement on Tuesday. “By working with TSMC, US chipmakers will not face the financial burden of incremental investment
DIVERSIFICATION: Although COVID-19 would push more companies to produce in emerging markets, DBS said that it was unlikely that firms would totally leave China Geopolitical tensions and supply disruptions are expected to accelerate the migration of manufacturing out of China, as concerns about the risk of production concentrated in one country increase, S&P Global Ratings said. Although its economic expansion might be weaker than previous levels due to the accelerated relocation of manufacturing, China’s economic growth would still be stronger than that of most other economies, the ratings agency said. “While absolute growth rates will moderate, we believe China’s economic performance will continue to be a key sovereign credit support,” S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Tan Kim Eng (陳錦榮) said in a statement on Thursday. “Its growth
Taiwan’s corporate landscape has changed significantly over the past 20 years, with Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) replacing Formosa Plastics Corp (台塑) as the revenue leader, while Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC, 台積電) has emerged as the most profitable firm, a survey of Taiwan’s 50 largest companies published on Tuesday last week showed. The Chinese-language CommonWealth Magazine survey ranked Taiwan’s 50 largest companies based on their revenue last year, and compared them with the results of a similar survey it conducted in 2000. Only 33 companies on the original list remained in this year’s rankings, the survey found, following two
Luxury hotel Mandarin Oriental Taipei (文華東方酒店) yesterday announced that it would suspend guestroom operations and lay off related staffers from Monday, as regional border controls and travel restrictions are unlikely to be lifted anytime soon. The partial shutdown would not affect the five-star hotel’s restaurants, bars, spa, and conference and banquet facilities, which this month have almost recovered to pre-pandemic levels, it said. “Mandarin Oriental Taipei will suspend all guestroom services from June 1 due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic,” the hotel said after four months of maintaining normal operations proved unsustainable. The change necessitates downsizing and the hotel is handling