Environmentally friendly finance is blooming thanks to investors willing to weigh profits against ecology, but decisions about meaningful investments can be complex.
At first sight the idea of “green finance” as a vehicle to protect the environment or help businesses in their transition toward a more sustainable future seems non-controversial.
However, green finance lumps together a dizzying array of options and a debate is raging over which ones are truly worthy of green investor money — and which are not.
Photo: EPA-EFE
What about, say, oil companies? No way, respond critics, pointing to the damage that the exploration and use of fossil fuel has done to the planet.
However, others say it would be ecologically responsible to help oil majors shift toward a greener future by developing alternative energy sources.
Nuclear energy is another hot potato. The industry was once unanimously reviled as the archenemy by the environmental movement, but some now admit that the absence of damaging greenhouse gases from nuclear power stations has given them pause.
A decade after the launch of the early green bonds — long-term borrowing for environmental projects — investors’ options have grown dramatically, but the share of green instruments in global finance is still small.
“Green bond issuance in 2018 so far have reached US$156.8 billion, which is around 2 percent of the global bond market,” said Frederic Gabizon, head of debt capital markets at HSBC France.
“This may seem marginal, but growth has been exponential since the start,” he said, adding that investors needed to take the long view given the slow pace of green infrastructure growth.
Pressure from civil society, governments and private citizens has prompted money professionals to look beyond purely financial motives as they respond to green investor interest, and to polish their image along the way.
It is true that green investments rarely outperform traditional placements in terms of short-term yields, but modern investors seem to be taking a broader view than just monetary returns.
“We’re seeing a new young generation of savers coming through now, who want slightly different things,” said Rob Hardy, head of EMEA corporate governance at JPMorgan Chase & Co.
“There is no point in earning a lot of money if you can’t breathe the air,” he said.
There is no binding global regulatory framework as yet for green finance, but most professionals apply the so-called “green bonds principles” issued by the International Capital Market Association to their own operations.
In a wind farm project, for example, the borrower must prove that the money really was used for the farm’s construction and be able to provide an exact measure of the project’s environmental impact.
External auditing has also become commonplace, said Rahul Ghosh, senior vice president for global environmental, social and governance questions at Moody’s.
“Today in Europe, I believe more than 95 percent of green bonds issued in the market will carry some sort of external review,” he said.
This trend, he said, was particularly important to combat “greenwashing,” the attempt to put an environmentally friendly spin on practices that are actually harmful.
“Even if the methodologies have not all been standardized, we are starting to have tools to tackle the complexity of this subject,” said Sandrine Enguehard, a green finance specialist at French bank Societe Generale SA.
“You can’t just limit yourself to measuring pollution at the end of an exhaust pipe,” she said.
Experts have said that evaluating the carbon footprint of a wind turbine is relatively easy, but what about the complexity of measuring the environmental impact of an urban rehabilitation program?
“As an investor, you have to do your homework, spend some time to be sure it isn’t greenwashing,” said Bram Bos, a green bond portfolio manager at NN Investment Partners, an asset management firm.
However, greenwashing is still very common, according to the French Social Investment Forum, an association promoting responsible finance.
“Although outright lies are very rare thankfully, there are still bad practices and some people abuse the ecology argument,” it said.
However, if they do, they risk losing their good name in the investment community with serious consequences, said Stephane Marciel, head of Sustainable Bonds at Societe Generale.
“Reputation is a very powerful weapon,” he said. “If funds are not used properly, the borrower’s reputation is ruined and they lose access to the market.”
UNCERTAINTY: Innolux activated a stringent supply chain management mechanism, as it did during the COVID-19 pandemic, to ensure optimal inventory levels for customers Flat-panel display makers AUO Corp (友達) and Innolux Corp (群創) yesterday said that about 12 to 20 percent of their display business is at risk of potential US tariffs and that they would relocate production or shipment destinations to mitigate the levies’ effects. US tariffs would have a direct impact of US$200 million on AUO’s revenue, company chairman Paul Peng (彭雙浪) told reporters on the sidelines of the Touch Taiwan trade show in Taipei yesterday. That would make up about 12 percent of the company’s overall revenue. To cope with the tariff uncertainty, AUO plans to allocate its production to manufacturing facilities in
Taiwan will prioritize the development of silicon photonics by taking advantage of its strength in the semiconductor industry to build another shield to protect the local economy, National Development Council (NDC) Minister Paul Liu (劉鏡清) said yesterday. Speaking at a meeting of the legislature’s Economics Committee, Liu said Taiwan already has the artificial intelligence (AI) industry as a shield, after the semiconductor industry, to safeguard the country, and is looking at new unique fields to build more economic shields. While Taiwan will further strengthen its existing shields, over the longer term, the country is determined to focus on such potential segments as
Chizuko Kimura has become the first female sushi chef in the world to win a Michelin star, fulfilling a promise she made to her dying husband to continue his legacy. The 54-year-old Japanese chef regained the Michelin star her late husband, Shunei Kimura, won three years ago for their Sushi Shunei restaurant in Paris. For Shunei Kimura, the star was a dream come true. However, the joy was short-lived. He died from cancer just three months later in June 2022. He was 65. The following year, the restaurant in the heart of Montmartre lost its star rating. Chizuko Kimura insisted that the new star is still down
While China’s leaders use their economic and political might to fight US President Donald Trump’s trade war “to the end,” its army of social media soldiers are embarking on a more humorous campaign online. Trump’s tariff blitz has seen Washington and Beijing impose eye-watering duties on imports from the other, fanning a standoff between the economic superpowers that has sparked global recession fears and sent markets into a tailspin. Trump says his policy is a response to years of being “ripped off” by other countries and aims to bring manufacturing to the US, forcing companies to employ US workers. However, China’s online warriors
RSS