Shenzhen is the only downer this year among major Asian stock markets.
The Shenzhen Composite Index, often referred to as China’s NASDAQ, fell about 4 percent in US dollar terms, a sad result compared with the more than 35 percent gain in Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index.
The Shanghai Stock Exchange SSE 50 A-Share Index, the so-called “Beautiful 50” gauge of China’s top blue-chips, advanced 25 percent.
Beijing is blaming Shenzhen’s dismal report card on one man, Jia Yueting (賈躍亭), founder of and the biggest stakeholder in Shenzhen-listed Leshi Internet Information & Technology Corp (LeEco, 樂視).
At its height in May 2015, LeEco was worth more than 150 billion yuan (US$23 billion), ahead of the cash-cow telecom-equipment maker ZTE Corp (中興) and the sixth-largest firm listed in Shenzhen.
Jia embodied the excess of China’s 2015 dot-com boom, talking of expanding his tech empire to everything from smartphones to smart cars. The reality was an alarming cash-flow profile.
Two years on, the picture could not be more different. LeEco trading has been halted for eight months after the stock lost two-thirds of its value and Beijing is making a half-hearted attempt to claw back money for shareholders.
This week, a Chinese court seized all the assets owned by Jia that it could unearth and came up with just 1.3 million yuan. The China Securities Regulatory Commission has ordered Jia, living in the US, to return to China.
Even the local media acknowledge that the regulator has no power to enforce that order.
What is LeEco worth now? At its last traded price, it was valued at 4.9 times book.
However, as a typical technology company, much of LeEco’s assets — about 30 percent — is in intangibles, often intellectual property such as know-how and patents, which could be worth nothing.
This question has vexed many Chinese fund managers. Back in 2015, LeEco was such a big name that mutual funds marched in; now, the likes of China Post & Capital Fund(中郵基金) and China Southern Fund Management (南方基金管理) are stuck.
For example, the 1.1 billion-yuan China Post Core Competence Flexible Allocation Mixed Fund still counts LeEco as its second-largest holding, at 10 percent.
Because of the eight-month halt, the manager had to write down that stake repeatedly, last month estimating that LeEco was worth 3.92 yuan per share, 25 percent of the last-traded price.
No surprise, the fund has slumped 29 percent this year.
This brings us back to the Shenzhen market: Stocks listed there provide little or no protection. The Shenzhen Composite Index is still valued at 3.1 times book and that multiple is likely to be a lot higher based on tangible book only.
By comparison, despite this year’s rally, the Beautiful 50 are trading at just 1.5 times book. More importantly, most of those companies are state-owned. If something goes wrong, the biggest shareholder — the Chinese government — would not play the catch-me-if-you-can game investors are seeing with Jia.
How times have changed. For years, Shenzhen was the destination. Now investors prefer the Shanghai market laden with state-owned enterprises.
Some might count it an achievement that Jia has sent retail investors back to the embrace of the Chinese state.
Shuli Ren is a Bloomberg Gadfly columnist covering Asian markets. She previously wrote on markets for Barron’s, following a career as an investment banker, and is a CFA charterholder.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg LP and its owners.
From India to China to the US, automakers cannot make vehicles — not that no one wants any, but because a more than US$450 billion industry for semiconductors got blindsided. How did both sides end up here? Over the past two weeks, automakers across the world have bemoaned the shortage of chips. Germany’s Audi, owned by Volkswagen AG, would delay making some of its high-end vehicles because of what chief executive officer Markus Duesmann called a “massive” shortfall in an interview with the Financial Times. The firm has furloughed more than 10,000 workers and reined in production. That is a further blow
Answering to a reported request by Germany to help address a chip shortage in its auto industry, the Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday said that it was in talks with domestic chip suppliers. Foreign media over the weekend reported that German Minister of Economic Affairs Peter Altmaier had sent a request to Taipei to ask Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to cooperate more closely with German automakers to provide microchips and sensors, to bridge a shortage that has emerged over the past few months. The MOEA said that it had not yet received the request and could therefore not elaborate
FOCUS ON FOUNDRIES: An analyst said that some investors would be disappointed because they were expecting a larger announcement of a partnership with TSMC Intel Corp’s incoming chief executive officer Pat Gelsinger on Thursday pledged to regain the company’s lead in chip manufacturing, countering growing calls from some investors to shed that part of its business. “I am confident that the majority of our 2023 products will be manufactured internally,” Gelsinger said. “At the same time, given the breadth of our portfolio, it’s likely that we will expand our use of external foundries for certain technologies and products.” He plans to provide more details after officially taking over the CEO role on Feb. 15, but Gelsinger was clear that Intel is sticking with its once mighty
AWARENESS NEEDED: The central bank urged lenders to know their customers before undertaking business for them and to seek funding in conventional ways The central bank yesterday said that it would take action against four foreign lenders for their involvement in helping companies trade in the deliverable forward market in contravention of foreign-exchange regulations. Some grain merchants newly based in Taiwan have since July 2019 been practicing questionable currency-trading activity, with the help of branches and subsidiaries of six foreign banks, the monetary policymaker told an unscheduled news conference. Affiliated firms as of July last year completed currency-related deals they referred to as trading that totaled US$11 billion, which was not in sync with their real business needs, the central bank said after wrapping up