Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) yesterday scrapped its chief executive’s bonus for damaging the bank’s reputation amid allegations it broke money-laundering and counterterrorism financing laws, but said he retained the board’s confidence.
Australia’s financial intelligence agency last week accused the bank of roughly 53,700 breaches, launching a civil court action that could see the country’s biggest lender fined several billion dollars.
The case is the largest of its kind in Australian corporate history, and sent Commonwealth Bank shares sliding for their biggest one-day decline in 18 months on Friday.
CBA’s board said yesterday it had cut short-term bonuses to zero for the chief executive, Ian Narev, and other top executives for the year to June 30.
“In reaching this conclusion the overriding consideration of the board was the collective accountability of senior management for the overall reputation of the group,” chairman Catherine Livingstone said in a statement.
The accusations have revived calls for a powerful judicial inquiry into Australia’s banking system following a series of scandals including insurance fraud and interest rate rigging in recent years.
Australian Treasurer Scott Morrison, who has previously rejected pressure for such an inquiry, yesterday told parliament that the government was prepared “to consider all options.”
An inquiry known as a Royal Commission could have the ability to interrogate bank executives and demand full disclosure of internal documents. The proposal has widespread public support and the backing of the opposition Labor Party.
“Mr Narev retains the full confidence of the board,” the bank’s statement said.
Sharing some accountability, Livingstone said directors’ fees had been cut by 20 percent for the 2018 financial year.
The move, designed to smoothe public concerns, came a day before the bank releases its annual results, with analysts tipping record cash earnings of A$9.8 billion (US$7.78 billion).
Commonwealth Bank paid Narev A$2.9 million in short-term bonuses as part of a total package of A$8.8 million last year.
In order to prevent a board spill being triggered at the annual general meeting in November, the bank needs to ensure its remuneration report is approved by more than 75 percent of voting shareholders, following a “first strike” against it last year. Under Australian law, a board spill can be triggered if two consecutive remuneration reports are voted down.
Stephen Mayne, a director at the Australian Shareholders’ Association, which aggregates about A$500 million worth of CBA’s shareholder proxy votes, said if that happened the bank would need to hold a special shareholders meeting spilling the board within 90 days of the meeting.
“That is something that could be very much in focus in the mind of the board, that their own positions could be under scrutiny in an entire boards spill,” he said.
The bank is accused of systematically failing to identify, monitor and report suspicious transactions totaling over A$77 million, and failing to act promptly on police instructions to suspend suspicious accounts.
Narev has played down the allegations, blaming most of the breaches on a software issue that was fixed as soon as it came to light.
Six alleged breaches related to customers who had been assessed by the bank as posing a potential risk of terrorism, or terrorism financing. Others involved money-laundering syndicates subject to police investigations.
Each breach carries a maximum penalty of A$18 million, and Mayne said it would be appropriate for the bank to note a contingent liability for a potential fine in the financial accounts to be released this week.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
‘LEGACY CHIPS’: Chinese companies have dramatically increased mature chip production capacity, but the West’s drive for secure supply chains offers a lifeline for Taiwan When Powerchip Technology Corp (力晶科技) entered a deal with the eastern Chinese city of Hefei in 2015 to set up a new chip foundry, it hoped the move would help provide better access to the promising Chinese market. However, nine years later, that Chinese foundry, Nexchip Semiconductor Corp (合晶集成), has become one of its biggest rivals in the legacy chip space, leveraging steep discounts after Beijing’s localization call forced Powerchip to give up the once-lucrative business making integrated circuits for Chinese flat panels. Nexchip is among Chinese foundries quickly winning market share in the crucial US$56.3 billion industry of so-called legacy
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known