Qualcomm Inc accused Apple Inc of lying to regulators to spur investigations of the chipmaker, and threatening it to cover up the use of inferior parts in some iPhones.
The world’s largest maker of smartphone semiconductors responded to a January lawsuit from Apple with counterclaims f late on Monday or damages, alleging the iPhone maker breached contractual pledges, mischaracterized their agreements and misrepresented facts.
“We were really stunned by some of the things that they included in their suit,” Qualcomm general counsel Don Rosenberg said. “This is our attempt to respond to some disturbing elements in their complaint.”
At the heart of the worsening standoff is a commercial dispute over how much Qualcomm is entitled to charge smartphone makers to use its patented technology, whether or not they use its chips.
The San Diego, California-based company gets the majority of its profit from licensing technology that covers the fundamentals of all modern mobile phone systems.
Qualcomm shares are down 12 percent since Apple sued on Jan. 20, wiping more than US$10 billion off the chipmaker’s market value.
Apple spokesman Josh Rosenstock declined to comment on the filing, saying the company’s lawsuit explains its position on the matter.
“We are extremely disappointed in the way Qualcomm is conducting its business with us and unfortunately after years of disagreement over what constitutes a fair and reasonable royalty we have no choice left but to turn to the courts,” Apple said in a Jan. 20 statement.
Apple is alone among major handset makers in not paying Qualcomm directly and has instead paid through contract manufacturers in Asia who build the iPhone.
It is now meddling in the legal agreements Qualcomm has with those suppliers, including Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), as it pressures the chipmaker to cut a more favorable deal on licensing fees, Rosenberg said.
According to Qualcomm, Apple is behind regulatory investigations of its business practices worldwide.
Cupertino, California-based Apple has lobbied with “false and misleading statements to induce regulators to take action against us because it would be in their commercial interests,” Rosenberg said.
In December last year, South Korea’s antitrust regulator slapped a record 1.03 trillion won (US$899 million at the current exchange rate) fine on Qualcomm for violating antitrust laws.
Then, in January, the US Federal Trade Commission accused it in a lawsuit of forcing Apple to use its chips exclusively in return for lower licensing fees and unfairly cutting out competitors. It is also facing investigations in Taiwan and Europe.
Apple filed its antitrust complaint on Jan. 20 in Qualcomm’s hometown of San Diego, accusing the chipmaker of illegally trying to control the market for chips and improperly withholding more than US$1 billion in “rebates” to punish the iPhone-maker for talking to South Korean regulators.
Apple sought to have its case joined with one filed by the US Federal Trade Commission in northern California.
The commission has also accused Qualcomm of illegally maintaining a monopoly for semiconductors in mobile phones.
Apple’s request was denied on Wednesday.
Qualcomm is now trying to have the commission’s case dismissed.
In addition to the US$1 billion in withheld fees, Apple is seeking billions more in compensation for what it calls past overcharges, and lower royalties going forward.
Qualcomm says Apple has soured a decade worth of working together and has threatened it to try to prevent it from publicly speaking about the performance of the iPhone 7.
Some models of that device rely on Intel Corp modems for their connections to telephone networks and, according to Qualcomm, are not as good as the ones that use its modems.
“We didn’t ask for this fight. Apple is a customer,” Rosenberg said. “We, of course, would like to continue to and will continue to do business with Apple.”
While Apple’s iPhone revolutionized the smartphone industry in 2007 with its sleek design and user-friendly apps, none of them would have worked without the foundational technology developed by Qualcomm and other companies, Rosenberg said.
He said Qualcomm gets “a small fraction” of the price of an iPhone, and contrasted that with the more than US$1 billion Apple sought from rival Samsung Electronics Co over the use of patented features like a pinching motion to expand or contract images.
STEPPING UP: The firm has also asked employees to work in split shifts from this week and to halt all but essential overseas business travel from next month Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) has implemented a remote work policy for employees not on production lines in an attempt to curb the spread of COVID-19, the world’s largest contract chipmaker said yesterday. This is the first time in the Hsinchu-based company’s history that it has launched a large-scale remote work policy, joining global technology companies, such as Apple Inc and Google, that encourage employees to work from home. The chipmaker has also asked employees to work in split shifts from this week, it said. As the number of virus infections continues to climb worldwide, TSMC has urged employees to halt unnecessary
A two-hour drive south of Amsterdam in Veldhoven, workers decked out head-to-toe in protective gear toil in vast assembly halls. Before entering the inner sanctuary of the facilities, they meticulously layer on masks, gloves and special socks. A single speck of dust or a hair can have devastating effects on production. The result of all this painstaking process is an environment that is 10,000 times more purified than outside. As COVID-19 grips the world, it might just be the safest place to work right now. The teams belong to ASML Holding NV, which holds a de facto monopoly on the industry of
DBS Bank Ltd yesterday hacked its GDP growth forecast for Taiwan this year to 0.9 percent, down from its estimate of 2.3 percent two months earlier, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and increasing financial market volatility. The bank’s latest forecast was even lower than London-based IHS Markit Ltd’s estimate of 1 percent, while other research institutes’ projections range from 1.6 percent to 2.6 percent. Taiwan’s economic momentum is being negatively affected by the pandemic, DBS said. The rapid spread of the disease from Asia to Europe and the US has dampened the bank’s previous expectation of a “V-shaped” global rebound in the
DOWNSIDE RISKS: Firms have a ‘very low’ chance of boosting investment returns in the next two years, making it hard for them to improve their capitalization, an analyst said Taiwanese life insurers wanting to improve their capital structure face strong headwinds this year, given prolonged low interest rates and economic impacts derived from trade protectionism and the COVID-19 pandemic, Taiwan Ratings Corp (中華信評) said on Friday. The local life insurance sector also still has high asset risks and such risks are susceptible to market volatility, the local arm of Standard & Poor’s Global Ratings said. Since last year, major financial holding companies — including CTBC Financial Holding Co (中信金控), Cathay Financial Holding Co (國泰金控) and Shin Kong Financial Holding Co (新光金控) — have announced plans to raise fresh capital to