Britain’s financial services sector will accelerate plans to move some business overseas after British Prime Minister Theresa May on Tuesday said that the nation would quit the EU’s single market.
Businesses have been calling for clarity on what Britain’s relationship with Europe will be before deciding how to reshape their operations, but most major firms are now set to relocate some business to ensure they can still trade with Europe.
London’s future as Europe’s financial center is one of the biggest issues in Brexit talks, because it is Britain’s largest export sector and biggest source of corporate tax revenue.
Photo: AFP
“The worst case now seems to be the base case,” a senior executive at one major global bank said after May’s speech, adding that contingency planning would continue apace.
May is to meet the heads of several big players, including Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan chief executive officers Lloyd Blankfein and Jamie Dimon, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, for private talks today.
She faces an uphill struggle to persuade them not to shift some operations given Britain’s exit from the single market almost certainly means banks will lose “passporting” rights that enable them to sell products across the bloc from their European hubs in London.
If finance firms in the UK lose the right to operate across Europe, 75,000 jobs may disappear and the government may lose up to £10 billion (US$12.3 billion) in tax revenue, a report by consultancy firm Oliver Wyman said in October.
For May, leaving the EU’s single market and regaining full control of Britain’s borders were priorities.
“We do not seek membership of the single market. Instead we seek the greatest possible access to it through a new, comprehensive, bold and ambitious free-trade agreement,” she said in Tuesday’s speech.
The five largest US banks employ 40,000 people in London, more than in the rest of Europe combined, although some in London fear that could all change.
After the June 23 vote, business leaders begged for Britain to stay inside the single market, by having a Norway-style deal that would provide full access to Europe’s markets.
However, Britain’s finance industry has reluctantly given up on efforts to keep full access after Brexit and is pushing instead for a more limited trade deal that would potentially exclude some financial products.
Banks have been pushing for the government to secure a transitional period in case it proves difficult to negotiate a favorable deal or if talks are protracted and go beyond the two-year time frame for divorce talks once this is triggered.
May signaled for the first time that she strongly believes in a transition phase.
“We believe a phased process of implementation, in which both Britain and the EU institutions and member states prepare for the new arrangements that will exist between us will be in our mutual self-interest,” she said.
However, she gave few details on how such a transition would work or how long it would last.
Lawyers advising companies in the financial sector said firms would be unwise to rely on hopes of a staggered exit period given that lack of clarity.
“We have a real concern that firms may be relying on the government delivering a transitional deal that simply won’t be possible in the time that we have,” said Polly James, a partner at law firm Berwin Leighton Paisner.
“We are therefore continuing to advise our financial institution clients to keep developing their contingency plans for securing post-Brexit access to the single market in financial services,” she added.
Taiwan’s technology protection rules prohibits Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) from producing 2-nanometer chips abroad, so the company must keep its most cutting-edge technology at home, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. Kuo made the remarks in response to concerns that TSMC might be forced to produce advanced 2-nanometer chips at its fabs in Arizona ahead of schedule after former US president Donald Trump was re-elected as the next US president on Tuesday. “Since Taiwan has related regulations to protect its own technologies, TSMC cannot produce 2-nanometer chips overseas currently,” Kuo said at a meeting of the legislature’s
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process