The legal powers that global companies would gain under huge Pacific and Atlantic trade deals could erode efforts to combat global warming, the Sierra Club said on Wednesday last week.
The environmental group said the two pacts championed by Washington would allow foreign investors to use private tribunals to challenge public policies aimed at restricting the use of fossil fuels.
“Forty-five of the 50 private corporations historically responsible for the most climate-disrupting emissions would be empowered to challenge climate policies” if the two trade deals are implemented, the Sierra Club said in a new report.
The report took aim at investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), one of the most contentious provisions in the already-agreed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), which is still being negotiated.
ISDS offers companies access to international arbitration of disputes with the countries they invest in. That can expand their protection against unfair treatment, but critics claim it would allow them to override a country’s justice system and national policies.
ISDS is already in place in bilateral US trade deals, but would be greatly expanded under the 12-country TPP and under TTIP, which would govern trade and investment between the US and the EU.
The Sierra Club said ISDS opens the way for mining and energy companies to claim compensation if government policies hinder their plans for investment in fracking, offshore and onshore drilling, and pipelines.
It said that under the existing North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Canada’s TransCanada has threatened to seek US$15 billion in compensation via an ISDS tribunal after the US government last year blocked its Keystone XL oil pipeline project.
It also cited US oil fracking company Lone Pine Resources Inc’s 2013 NAFTA arbitration challenge against Canada’s Quebec Province for the allegedly arbitrary revocation of its “right” to drill for oil and gas under the St Lawrence River.
With TPP and TTIP, claims like this could soar, said Ben Beachy, a senior policy advisor on trade at the Sierra Club.
“No previous trade deal has granted such broad rights to firms with such broad interests in maintaining US fossil fuel dependency,” he said. “The corporations that would gain this ability are the world’s largest polluters.”
Defenders of the trade deals say that the TPP explicitly gives governments the right to implement policies on the environment and health in the public interest.
“Countries retain the right to regulate in the public interest,” the office of the US Trade Representative said.
The Sierra Club report calls the TPP provisions “far too weak to offer adequate protection” and still allows investors the right to bypass domestic courts.
Three experts in the high technology industry have said that US President Donald Trump’s pledge to impose higher tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors is part of an effort to force Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to the negotiating table. In a speech to Republicans on Jan. 27, Trump said he intends to impose tariffs on Taiwan to bring chip production to the US. “The incentive is going to be they’re not going to want to pay a 25, 50 or even a 100 percent tax,” he said. Darson Chiu (邱達生), an economics professor at Taichung-based Tunghai University and director-general of
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) is reportedly making another pass at Nissan Motor Co, as the Japanese automaker's tie-up with Honda Motor Co falls apart. Nissan shares rose as much as 6 percent after Taiwan’s Central News Agency reported that Hon Hai chairman Young Liu (劉揚偉) instructed former Nissan executive Jun Seki to connect with French carmaker Renault SA, which holds about 36 percent of Nissan’s stock. Hon Hai, the Taiwanese iPhone-maker also known as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), was exploring an investment or buyout of Nissan last year, but backed off in December after the Japanese carmaker penned a deal
WASHINGTON POLICY: Tariffs of 10 percent or more and other new costs are tipped to hit shipments of small parcels, cutting export growth by 1.3 percentage points The decision by US President Donald Trump to ban Chinese companies from using a US tariff loophole would hit tens of billions of dollars of trade and reduce China’s economic growth this year, according to new estimates by economists at Nomura Holdings Inc. According to Nomura’s estimates, last year companies such as Shein (希音) and PDD Holdings Inc’s (拼多多控股) Temu shipped US$46 billion of small parcels to the US to take advantage of the rule that allows items with a declared value under US$800 to enter the US tariff-free. Tariffs of 10 percent or more and other new costs would slash such
SENSOR BUSINESS: The Taiwanese company said that a public tender offer would begin on May 7 through its wholly owned subsidiary Yageo Electronics Japan Yageo Corp (國巨), one of the world’s top three suppliers of passive components, yesterday said it is to launch a tender offer to fully acquire Japan’s Shibaura Electronics Co for up to ¥65.57 billion (US$429.37 million), with an aim to expand its sensor business. The tender offer would be a crucial step for the company to expand its sensor business, Yageo said. Shibaura Electronics is the world’s largest supplier of thermistors, with a market share of 13 percent, research conducted in 2022 by the Japanese firm showed. If a deal goes ahead, it would be the second acquisition of a sensor business since