Tue, Mar 22, 2016 page15

• Apple, US face off in court over privacy

  ‘TARGETED ORDER’: US authorities said they are asking for information stored on a single device, but Apple said the request should be considered in a ‘broader context’

  • AFP, LOS ANGELES
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  The US government and Apple Inc were to face off in court yesterday in a closely watched case that could have wide-reaching implications on digital security and privacy.

  The crucial hearing before a federal judge in Southern California focuses on the battle between the tech giant and federal investigators who want help from Apple to unlock an iPhone linked to one of the shooters in the December last year terror attack in San Bernardino, California.

  “It’s a fight over the future of high-tech surveillance, the trust infrastructure undergirding the global software ecosystem, and how far technology companies and software developers can be conscripted as unwilling suppliers of hacking tools for governments,” wrote Julian Sanchez, a surveillance law expert at the libertarian Cato Institute in Washington.

  

  A New York City Police officer stands across the street from the Apple Store on 5th Avenue in New York on March 11.

  Photo: Reuters

  “It’s also the public face of a conflict that will undoubtedly be continued in secret and is likely already well underway.”

  Apple, backed by a broad coalition of technology giants like Google, Facebook and Yahoo, said that the FBI is seeking a “back door” into all iPhones as part of the probe into the Dec. 2 massacre that left 14 people dead.

  It also contends that the government is overstepping legal bounds by using a statute called the All Writs Act, which dates back to 1789, in order to force Apple to hack into the iPhone in question.

  The company said that in deciding the case, the court must take into account the “broader context,” which touches on the larger debate over data privacy.

  The government has fired back, saying that Apple was not above the law and that its request for technical assistance concerns a single case — the Apple iPhone 5C, which was shooter Syed Farook’s work phone from the San Bernardino health department.

  Both Farook and his wife Tashfeen Malik died in a firefight with police after the attack. Two other mobile phones linked to the couple were found destroyed.

  “It is a narrow, targeted order... The government and the community need to know what is on the terrorist’s phone, and the government needs Apple’s assistance to find out,” US Justice Department lawyers wrote in a brief to the court.

  Each side in the case has dug in its heels, exchanging a volley of legal briefs, with the outcome being watched closely across the globe.

  Tech companies, security experts and civil rights advocates said the issue is not so much about one iPhone as it is about setting a precedent that would open the door to companies being forced to hand over customer data.

  Also in question is whether Apple encryption engineers would abide by a court order to help the government unlock Farook’s iPhone.

  The New York Times, citing more than half-dozen current and former Apple employees, said some might refuse to abide by a court order and others could even quit the company rather than undermine the security of the software they created.

  Experts also said that the likelihood of any significant information being found on the iPhone is slim given that it was Farook’s work phone and that he and his wife apparently destroyed two other phones found after the attack.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    China condemns Pokemon, Detective Conan for spreading ‘Japanese militarism’

  • 2

    Video shows indigenous submarine in action

  • 3

    Atletico rout Barcelona in Copa

  • 4

    Sri Lanka thrash Oman with new high score

  • 5

    Leonard’s 41 points lead Clippers over Timberwolves, Knicks cruise to victory