It is a concept that conjures up images of European Central Bank (ECB) president Mario Draghi donning his flying suit, starting his helicopter and flying out over the eurozone to throw money to the crowds below.
In the question-and-answer session of his traditional post-meeting news conference last week, Draghi was asked whether “helicopter money” was part of the ECB’s toolbox in its long — and so far largely ineffectual — fight against the specter of deflation in the euro area.
However, Draghi said that the ECB had not “really thought or talked about helicopter money” at this stage.
“We haven’t really studied [it] yet,” he said, but added: “It’s a very interesting concept that is now being discussed by academic economists and in various environments.”
“Helicopter money” was originally posited by US economist Milton Friedman in 1969 when he suggested in a thought game that a helicopter fly over a community and drop cash from the sky in the hope that by putting more money directly into consumers’ pockets, they would scurry to the shops to spend their windfalls.
The ensuing surge in demand would revitalize the economy and avert the threat of deflation by persuading retailers to raise their prices, Friedman said.
It is a concept that has never been tried out in real life by any major central bank.
However, with growing concern that quantitative easing and zero or even negative interest rates have lost their power to kickstart the economy, it is clear that Draghi is not dismissing the idea entirely out of hand.
It would “clearly involve complexities, both accounting-wise and legal-wise, for our view,” Friedman said, but conceded it could “mean many different things, and so we have to see.”
“Helicopter money is currently the object of intense reflection in academic and central bank circles,” German DIW economic think tank chief Marcel Fratzcher said, adding “it would really be an instrument of last resort, if nothing else worked.”
Over the past two years, the ECB has pulled out all the stops to prevent the single currency area from slipping into deflation — a dangerous downward spiral of falling prices.
It has slashed interest rates to zero and lower, pumped unprecedented amounts of liquidity into the financial system, made an unlimited amount of cheap loans available to banks, and bought up massive quantities of bonds via its quantitative easing (QE) program.
The idea is to kickstart lending — the financial lubricant that keeps the economy up and running smoothly — and by extension boost growth and recovery.
However, for all the ECB’s efforts, eurozone inflation is still a long way short of the level of “close to, but just below 2.0 percent” that the central bank believes is conducive to healthy economic growth.
In fact, falling oil prices pushed eurozone inflation back into negative territory last month.
Lending is still sluggish and the hundreds of billions the ECB has pumped into the system are still not reaching households and businesses.
A campaign coalition calling itself QE for People has calculated that if the amount pumped into the economy so far were shared out among all the citizens of the eurozone, it would amount to 175 euros (US$197) per month for everyone.
However, helicopter money need not take the form of air-dropping cash.
It could also be implemented by cutting taxes or healthcare payments, all financed by money printed by the ECB.
Swiss bank SYZ economist Michael Malquarti has said for years that the Swiss National Bank should pay money directly to citizens via the nations healthcare system.
“I’d like to see Switzerland be a pioneer in this area. That could break down a psychological barrier,” he said.
However, implementing such financial relief in an area as big as the 19 nations that share the euro would encounter a number of technical and ethical hurdles, not to mention legal ones.
Under the ECB’s own statutes, it is expressly forbidden from financing governments, even if there appears to be nothing to stop it from handing cash out to citizens.
“Until now, in order to have money, you have to earn it. If the ECB started handing out money for nothing, that would turn economic thinking on its head and even jeopardize the market economy,” Commerzbank economist Joerg Kraemer said.
Nevertheless, “if everything else fails, the discussion about helicopter money will move up to the next level,” a fellow Commerzbank economist, Christophe Rieger, said.
Jonathan Loynes of Capital Economics said that “the lesson of the past few years is that policies previously considered to be unimaginable can become reality.”
Three experts in the high technology industry have said that US President Donald Trump’s pledge to impose higher tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors is part of an effort to force Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to the negotiating table. In a speech to Republicans on Jan. 27, Trump said he intends to impose tariffs on Taiwan to bring chip production to the US. “The incentive is going to be they’re not going to want to pay a 25, 50 or even a 100 percent tax,” he said. Darson Chiu (邱達生), an economics professor at Taichung-based Tunghai University and director-general of
‘LEGACY CHIPS’: Chinese companies have dramatically increased mature chip production capacity, but the West’s drive for secure supply chains offers a lifeline for Taiwan When Powerchip Technology Corp (力晶科技) entered a deal with the eastern Chinese city of Hefei in 2015 to set up a new chip foundry, it hoped the move would help provide better access to the promising Chinese market. However, nine years later, that Chinese foundry, Nexchip Semiconductor Corp (合晶集成), has become one of its biggest rivals in the legacy chip space, leveraging steep discounts after Beijing’s localization call forced Powerchip to give up the once-lucrative business making integrated circuits for Chinese flat panels. Nexchip is among Chinese foundries quickly winning market share in the crucial US$56.3 billion industry of so-called legacy
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) is reportedly making another pass at Nissan Motor Co, as the Japanese automaker's tie-up with Honda Motor Co falls apart. Nissan shares rose as much as 6 percent after Taiwan’s Central News Agency reported that Hon Hai chairman Young Liu (劉揚偉) instructed former Nissan executive Jun Seki to connect with French carmaker Renault SA, which holds about 36 percent of Nissan’s stock. Hon Hai, the Taiwanese iPhone-maker also known as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), was exploring an investment or buyout of Nissan last year, but backed off in December after the Japanese carmaker penned a deal
WASHINGTON POLICY: Tariffs of 10 percent or more and other new costs are tipped to hit shipments of small parcels, cutting export growth by 1.3 percentage points The decision by US President Donald Trump to ban Chinese companies from using a US tariff loophole would hit tens of billions of dollars of trade and reduce China’s economic growth this year, according to new estimates by economists at Nomura Holdings Inc. According to Nomura’s estimates, last year companies such as Shein (希音) and PDD Holdings Inc’s (拼多多控股) Temu shipped US$46 billion of small parcels to the US to take advantage of the rule that allows items with a declared value under US$800 to enter the US tariff-free. Tariffs of 10 percent or more and other new costs would slash such