Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc’s (ASE, 日月光半導體) renewed attempt to buy out Siliconware Precision Industries Co (SPIL, 矽品精密) via a holding company does not sound convincing to clients and industry experts, an analyst said yesterday.
ASE’s move came as it aims to clinch a merger with SPIL after the world’s biggest chip packager suffered a setback in its second tender offer to boost its holding in SPIL to a controlling 49 percent stake, from 25 percent.
The unsuccessful takeover bid — coming after ASE failed to obtain permission from the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) to buy the additional stake in SPIL as of the expiration date on Thursday — also thwarts ASE’s ultimate goal to fully acquire its smaller rival.
“It is hard to say whether creating an industrial holding company to run the two companies will help allay the FTC’s concerns [over market competition],” Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI, 工研院) semiconductor analyst Jerry Peng (彭茂榮) said by telephone.
The watchdog is slated to make its final ruling before May 1.
ASE’s latest tender offer had solicited better-than-expected support from SPIL shareholders, with about 27 percent of shares of the planned purchase of 770 million shares, which is higher than the 5 percent minimum set by the firm.
The company is proposing to create an industrial holding company, with ASE and SPIL to be affiliated entities under the same umbrella, the company said on Thursday. Under the proposal, the two firms will retain their legal entities and operate independently, ASE said.
ASE said it also intends to retain all SPIL executives, including chairman Bough Lin (林文伯) and president Tsai Chi-wen (蔡祺文), as well as invite both Lin and Tsai to join the board of the planned holding company, ASE chief operating officer Tien Wu (吳田玉) told a media briefing on Thursday.
However, “order loss will be certain as clients will still see their bargaining power weaken since they practically place orders to one supplier,” Peng said.
In addition, the “hostile merger” — as it appears to SPIL for now — could lead to an exodus of a large number of high-ranking executives and industry experts from SPIL, Peng said.
“That will be a serious worry among local semiconductor heavyweights, if those experts accept job offers from China,” he added.
Hong Kong-based BNP Paribas SA analyst Szeho Ng (吳思浩) said ASE faces multiple challenges before the expiration of the tender offer, according to a report released on Monday.
“While a combined ASE-SPIL entity, which will have about 30 percent of global backend [chip assembling] share, might drive better supply discipline, we also expect clients, especially Greater China ones, to inevitably shift away from ASE-SPIL [entity] to avoid supplier and geographical concentration risk,” Ng said.
Ng said ASE’s planned takeover of another 24.71 percent of SPIL’s stakes could result in higher impairment risk and dividend cuts. In addition, the merger would not solve the problem of rising competition from Chinese rivals, Ng said.
Yuanta Securities Investment Consulting Co (元大投顧) said that the tender offer fell through as expected.
However, “we still hold the long-term view that ASE’s intent to consolidate SPIL works in the best interest of its shareholders,” Yuanta analyst Andrew Chen (陳治宇) said in a note.
Under Taiwan’s regulations, ASE would have to wait one year to put forward another tender offer.
Chen said he believes the deal is legitimate and poses no antitrust concerns.
Shares of ASE jumped 1.1 percent to NT$36.9 yesterday in Taipei trading, while SPIL shares fell 0.81 percent to NT$49.25, well below the NT$55 per share offered by ASE.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known
US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose up to 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan’s semiconductor exports to the US to encourage chip manufacturers to move their production facilities to the US, but experts are questioning his strategy, warning it could harm industries on both sides. “I’m very confused and surprised that the Trump administration would try and do this,” Bob O’Donnell, chief analyst and founder of TECHnalysis Research in California, said in an interview with the Central News Agency on Wednesday. “It seems to reflect the fact that they don’t understand how the semiconductor industry really works,” O’Donnell said. Economic sanctions would