Sun, Mar 22, 2015 page14

• US catfish farmers face higher bills after seeking regulation

  US producers asked for stricter regulation to counter competition from lower-priced imports, but the impending inspection changes could put further pressure on struggling catfish farmers

  • By Ron Nixon / NY Times News Service, WASHINGTON
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  In 2008, faced with increased competition from Vietnam and China, catfish producers in the US did the unthinkable: They asked for more regulation of their industry.

  Congress concurred and agreed to move the inspection of foreign and domestically produced catfish from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to a more rigorous program at the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). However, the process has dragged on for nearly seven years.

  Now, as US President Barack Obama’s administration prepares to finalize the inspection regulations, domestic catfish farmers may have received more than they bargained for, experts say.

  

  A man looks at catfish that have fallen from a truck on a street in Kaili, Guizhou Province, China on Wednesday.

  Photo: Reuters

  More rigorous inspections could cost an already beleaguered industry millions of dollars to comply with the new regulations, potentially driving more catfish farmers out of the business and costing hundreds of jobs in the rural south, said John Sackton, a seafood industry analyst.

  The agriculture department inspections, which would be more like those conducted at meat and poultry processing plants, are conducted daily and are more rigorous than the sporadic checks conducted by the FDA.

  “I don’t think they had a clue,” said David Acheson, a former associate commissioner for foods at the FDA who hads also worked at the agriculture department. “Catfish producers asked for stronger regulations, but I think many of them thought it would only apply to foreign producers.”

  Bari Cain, president of the Catfish Farmers of America, an industry trade group based in Mississippi, said farmers would be able to meet the new inspection requirements and ensure “the highest level of food safety for American consumers.”

  The US catfish industry, which is concentrated in Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi and Texas, has been steadily losing market share. The number of hectares devoted to catfish production dropped to 28,282 this year from 53,823 in 2008, department data showed.

  The industry says some of the decline can be attributed to higher prices for corn, which is the primary source for catfish feed.

  However, the main reason for the catfish industry’s woes, officials say, is lower-priced imports, primarily from Vietnam, which often undercut catfish raised in the US by US$2 a pound (0.45kg).

  Those imports now make up about 75 percent of the US market. Domestic catfish farmers say foreign-raised catfish is produced under lax safety standards, but the Vietnamese Association of Seafood Exporters and Producers, a trade group based in Ho Chi Minh City, said its catfish exports undergo rigorous testing and inspection.

  So the US industry turned to Congress for help.

  The catfish inspection office has long been the subject of intense debate, with the domestic catfish industry and seafood importers each accusing the other of providing misleading facts about the safety of imported catfish.

  Several lawmakers — most notably US senators John McCain and Jeanne Shaheen — called the agriculture department catfish inspection plan wasteful and intended to protect only domestic catfish producers. They sponsored an amendment to repeal the new catfish office during Farm Bill negotiations, but the amendment failed after lawmakers from catfish-producing states lobbied to revive the inspection office.

  The Obama administration had also opposed the new office, but it is still moving ahead with its creation.

  “We have worked to ensure the final regulations are reasonable and effectively ensure public health,” said Adam Tarr, a spokesman for the department’s Food Safety Inspection Service.

  US Senator Thad Cochran, a Republican from Mississippi, the largest catfish-producing state, said the office is needed to protect consumers.

  “Once the USDA catfish inspection program is implemented, both domestic and foreign producers will be required to provide a product that has been certified as safe and unadulterated,” Cochran said.

  Vietnam and other catfish exporters say the new office violates WTO rules, and the issue has now become part of the continuing Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations, according to people familiar with the talks.

  Trade experts said the catfish dispute would not derail a deal, but they warned that the catfish inspection office could harm the US’ efforts to win other concessions and could cause other countries to retaliate against US exports like beef and soybeans.

  The FDA and the agriculture department have radically different inspection systems, going back nearly a century.

  US catfish farmers argue that the agency examines only about 2 percent of all imported food. The farmers, and some food safety advocates, say that lack of inspections may allow fish into the country that could contain banned antibiotics or other chemicals. A 2012 Government Accountability Office study found that catfish was a low-risk food.

  Agriculture department inspectors are in meat and poultry plants daily checking for food safety and sanitation violations. The department also reviews safety systems in countries that want to export to the US.

  The FDA rarely inspects foreign or domestic food plants unless there is evidence of a problem. A new food safety law passed in 2010 will increase the number of foreign and domestic inspections by the FDA.

  Dickie Stevens, president of Consolidated Catfish in Isola, Mississippi, said he was not worried about the agriculture department inspections.

  “We should be able to deal with any new regulations,” he said. “And if there are plants out there that can’t, then they shouldn’t be selling catfish.”

  Gavin Gibbons, a spokesman for the National Fisheries Institute, a seafood producers trade group that is opposed to the new catfish inspection office, said the industry might come to regret its push for increased inspections.

  “This is the quintessential example of be careful what you ask for,” Gibbons said. “By trying to regulate the competition out of business, they may find that they could be regulating themselves out of business.”
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Minister warns Taiwanese about Chinese passports

  • 2

    Marine Corps unit receives M4A1 rifles, source says

  • 3

    Manchester United tap Carrick as interim coach

  • 4

    Taiwan passport rises three spots in global ranking

  • 5

    APEC Shenzen visit was smooth, safe: ministry official