The nation lags behind China in developing Internet banking because regulators are less tolerant of financial innovations that may upset the traditional banking ecosystem, Greg Gibb, chairman of the Shanghai Lujazui International Financial Asset Exchange Co, said yesterday.
Gibb, founder of Lufax.com, a peer-to-peer lending platform under China’s Ping An Group (中國平安), said the platform is the world’s third-largest P2P firm just two years after its formation, thanks to regulatory tolerance and the prevalence of the Internet and smartphones.
Peer-to-peer lending, also known as person-to-person lending and abbreviated to P2P lending, is the practice of lending money to unrelated individuals or peers without going through a traditional financial intermediary such as a bank.
Lending is transacted online on a host Web site using various lending platforms and credit checking tools. P2P lending is growing fast in many countries and China stays ahead in this market as the number of Internet users is increasing rapidly and regulatory restrictions are largely absent, said Gibb, who used to be chief operating officer at Taishin Financial Holding Co (台新金控).
There were 1,000 P2P companies in China as of last year with transactions totaling 105.8 billion yuan (US$17.03 billion), including 26.8 billion in deposits and 68.03 billion in loans, Gibb said.
Taiwan may not see a big breakthrough in the next three years as regulators are conservative about financial innovation, even though the government constantly underscores the importance of innovation, Gibb said, adding that the overcrowded and fragmented market helps limit bold and competitive strategies.
China allows non-traditional innovation and takes regulatory action only when necessary, he said.
That helps explain why China’s e-commerce agent Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (阿里巴巴) and its online payment affiliate, Alipay.com Co (支付寶) have expanded so fast, and risen to a globally dominant position, Gibb said.
“Greater market tolerance fosters better discipline among companies,” he said, whereas Taiwanese regulators have implemented detailed restrictions to slow e-commerce.
In addition, the large difference in interest margins between traditional banks and underground lenders provides business opportunities for P2P companies, Lufax.com vice president Hurbert Tai (戴修憲) said.
Chinese banks set interest rates at about 8 percent, but shadow banking firms may charge 30 percent to 40 percent.
Aware of the high credit risk linked to innovation, Gibb said he would not be surprised if 80 percent of P2P companies folded, as quite a few have exited the market, mainly because of reckless operations and loose credit analyses.
Lufax has managed to avoid the mistakes by using big data to analyze the credit profiles of potential clients, Gibb said.
Three experts in the high technology industry have said that US President Donald Trump’s pledge to impose higher tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors is part of an effort to force Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to the negotiating table. In a speech to Republicans on Jan. 27, Trump said he intends to impose tariffs on Taiwan to bring chip production to the US. “The incentive is going to be they’re not going to want to pay a 25, 50 or even a 100 percent tax,” he said. Darson Chiu (邱達生), an economics professor at Taichung-based Tunghai University and director-general of
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) is reportedly making another pass at Nissan Motor Co, as the Japanese automaker's tie-up with Honda Motor Co falls apart. Nissan shares rose as much as 6 percent after Taiwan’s Central News Agency reported that Hon Hai chairman Young Liu (劉揚偉) instructed former Nissan executive Jun Seki to connect with French carmaker Renault SA, which holds about 36 percent of Nissan’s stock. Hon Hai, the Taiwanese iPhone-maker also known as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), was exploring an investment or buyout of Nissan last year, but backed off in December after the Japanese carmaker penned a deal
WASHINGTON POLICY: Tariffs of 10 percent or more and other new costs are tipped to hit shipments of small parcels, cutting export growth by 1.3 percentage points The decision by US President Donald Trump to ban Chinese companies from using a US tariff loophole would hit tens of billions of dollars of trade and reduce China’s economic growth this year, according to new estimates by economists at Nomura Holdings Inc. According to Nomura’s estimates, last year companies such as Shein (希音) and PDD Holdings Inc’s (拼多多控股) Temu shipped US$46 billion of small parcels to the US to take advantage of the rule that allows items with a declared value under US$800 to enter the US tariff-free. Tariffs of 10 percent or more and other new costs would slash such
‘LEGACY CHIPS’: Chinese companies have dramatically increased mature chip production capacity, but the West’s drive for secure supply chains offers a lifeline for Taiwan When Powerchip Technology Corp (力晶科技) entered a deal with the eastern Chinese city of Hefei in 2015 to set up a new chip foundry, it hoped the move would help provide better access to the promising Chinese market. However, nine years later, that Chinese foundry, Nexchip Semiconductor Corp (合晶集成), has become one of its biggest rivals in the legacy chip space, leveraging steep discounts after Beijing’s localization call forced Powerchip to give up the once-lucrative business making integrated circuits for Chinese flat panels. Nexchip is among Chinese foundries quickly winning market share in the crucial US$56.3 billion industry of so-called legacy