Chinese banks had the biggest quarterly increase in bad loans since 2005 as a slowdown in the world’s second-largest economy causes defaults to rise.
Nonperforming loans rose by 54 billion yuan (US$8.7 billion) in the three months through March to 646.1 billion yuan, the highest level since September 2008, according to data released by the China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) yesterday. Bad loans accounted for 1.04 percent of total lending, up from 1 percent three months earlier.
The 10th straight quarterly increase in defaults adds to concern that banks’ profitability may slip as they build buffers to cover loan losses. Policymakers have also been cracking down on financing to weaker borrowers to rein in total debt, which has climbed to more than double the nation’s GDP.
“Asset quality is now the biggest overhang on the banking sector... The [Chinese] government’s reluctance to use stimulus and ease monetary policy has made it difficult for many borrowers to repay debt,” Shanghai-based Masterlink Securities Corp analyst Rainy Yuan said by telephone.
Concern that profitability will decline further dragged the Hong Kong shares of China’s five biggest banks down by an average 7.3 percent this year to Thursday, compared with the benchmark Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index’s 2.5 percent drop. The lenders traded at an average 4.8 times estimated 2014 profit, close to the lowest valuations on record.
Combined net income at China’s banks rose 16 percent to 427.6 billion yuan in the first quarter from a year earlier, CBRC data show. Their net interest margin, a key measure of lending profitability, fell to 2.58 percent as of March from 2.68 percent in December.
Lending in China is slowing as the government discourages credit to overextended industries and local governments as it cracks down on activity outside the formal banking system.
The nation’s broadest measure of new credit shrank 9 percent in the first quarter, and money supply in March grew at the slowest pace on record, underscoring risks of a deeper slowdown.
China’s economy expanded 7.4 percent in the first quarter, the slowest in 18 months. Growth of 7.3 percent is forecast for this year, the weakest pace since 1990, based on the median estimate in a survey of economists.
The economic slowdown has hurt borrowers’ ability to repay debt and driven defaults higher. The five biggest lenders had 377.1 billion yuan of nonperforming loans at the end of March, an increase of 8 percent from the beginning of the year, a separate CBRC statement on Thursday showed.
Chinese banks had 1.8 trillion yuan of loan-loss reserves at the end of March, accounting for 274 percent of their nonperforming loans, according to the regulator. That fell from 282.7 percent as of December.
Shanghai Chaori Solar Energy Science & Technology Co (超日太陽能) in March became the first Chinese company to default on onshore bonds when it failed to make a full coupon payment.
China averted its first trust default in at least a decade in January as investors in a 3 billion yuan product distributed by International Commercial Bank of China Ltd (ICBC, 中國工商銀行) were bailed out days before it matured.
The government has spent more than US$650 billion bailing out banks by carving out bad loans and injecting capital since the late 1990s, after years of government-directed lending caused default risk to balloon. In 2005, the nonperforming loan ratio at state-owned banks stood at 15 percent.
The government pumped US$15 billion of capital into ICBC in April 2005.
In October 2008, the government injected US$19 billion into Agricultural Bank of China Ltd (中國農業銀行) and removed about 800 billion yuan of nonperforming loans from its balance sheet.
‘BIG LOSS’: This year might see the last generation of Huawei’s Kirin chips, as their production would stop next month because they are made using US technology Chinese tech giant Huawei Technologies Co (華為) is running out of processor chips to make smartphones due to US sanctions and would be forced to stop production of its own most advanced chips, a company executive has said, in a sign of growing damage to Huawei’s business from US pressure. Huawei, one of the biggest producers of smartphones and network equipment, is at the center of US-Chinese tension over technology and security. Washington last year cut off Huawei’s access to US components and technology, and those penalties were tightened in May, when the White House barred vendors worldwide from using US
CORPORATE SCANDAL: Cathay Life has invested NT$13.3 billion in Bank Mayapada since 2015, but the latest loss of NT$8.8 billion has completely written off its investment Cathay Life Insurance Co (國泰人壽) yesterday said it would recognize an investment loss of NT$8.8 billion (US$298.1 million) in Indonesia’s Bank Mayapada Internasional Tbk PT due to concerns about the lender’s operations amid a corporate scandal. The company said it would revise its earnings result for June, from a net profit of NT$6.52 billion to a net loss of NT$520 million, its first monthly loss over the past 17 months. After booking an investment loss of NT$5.2 billion in Bank Mayapada earlier this year, Cathay Life has so far recognized total investment losses of NT$14 billion in the lender, executive vice president
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday reported that revenue last month expanded 25 percent annually, but fell 12.8 percent month-on-month to NT$105.96 billion (US$3.59 billion). In the first seven months of this year, the chipmaker’s revenue surged 33.6 percent to NT$727.26 billion, compared with NT$544.46 billion a year earlier. TSMC has said it aims to grow its revenue by more than 20 percent this year. The company has since May 15 stopped taking new orders from Huawei Technologies Co (華為), its second-biggest customer after Apple Inc, due to the US’ restrictions on exports containing US technologies. TSMC has no plans to
The US stock market has been on a tear, yet the country’s economy is in the dumps. So why do so many people believe — undoubtedly incorrectly — that the stock market has decoupled from reality? The economy many people experience, while bleak, is local, personal and, for the most part, either not publicly traded or plays only a small part in the stock market’s moves. To explain why these personal experiences have so little effect on equity markets, we must look more closely at the market role of the weakest industry sectors. The surprising conclusion: The most visible and economically vulnerable