With the younger generation opting to use their smartphones to tell time, the watch-making industry is being forced to get smart and high-tech to recapture consumers.
On show at the industry’s biggest watch and jewelery fair Baselworld this year are not only diamond-encrusted mechanical watches with complex movements, but an increasing number of timepieces that combine with the smartphone.
Some watchmakers unveiled luxury phones that incorporate mechanical watches, others were featuring watches with touchscreens. Japanese digital watchmaker Casio premiered watches that are able to communicate with smartphones.
Photo: AFP
“Many young people don’t wear watches anymore these days. They use their mobile phones to tell time,” said Fabrice Gonet, a designer from Slyde Watch SA.
Gonet and his business partners decided to create an electronic wristwatch with a touchscreen, which “lets people download photos, personalize their watch face,” although it does not have the telephone function.
“We thought of making this watch to recreate the link between horlogery and young people,” he said.
Asked if Apple could be a potential competitor, Gonet said that his company has taken out a patent for a virtual mechanic movement.
“The first thing we did was a feasibility study and we found that there was no patents for this. It was surprising, but it convinced us to go into it,” he added.
His company is not the only one tapping the smartphone market.
Ulysse Nardin, a Swiss luxury watchmaker, launched what it claimed is “the world’s first luxury hybrid smartphone,” integrating a mechanical watch rotor into the mobile phone.
The automatic rotor also creates energy to provide additional power to the phone.
Bobby Yampolsky, co-founder of UN Cells, who make the phones for Ulysse Nardin, admitted that it is insufficient to act as the sole power supply for the phone.
“If you wind it for four, five minutes you can make about a 30 second phone call or a few texts,” Yampolsky said.
Nevertheless, Yampolsky believes that such hybrid phones are the way forward.
“I feel this is the future. The watch world is over 300 years old. Cellphones are 30 years old. Before cellphones, watches were mobile technology. This is now mobile technology,” he said, holding up the phone, each of which costs between US$12,800 and US$130,000.
Mobile phones are “never going to take over completely, but it’s going to take up a huge part of the marketplace,” he added.
“The philosophy for us when we made this phone is, we asked ourselves, what do men have as a status symbol? We have our watches and we have our cars. This is basically the Ferrari that you can bring into a restaurant and put on the dining table,” Yampolsky said.
However, Casio, a long-term player in the watch industry that championed the quartz technology which almost brought about the demise of the mechanical watch, believes that there is still a place for the wristwatch.
This year, it introduced a watch that communicates with the mobile phone.
Casio’s managing director Hiroshi Nakamura explained that if the mobile phone rings during a meeting, a tap of the watch would stop the ringing.
Likewise, an e-mail arriving on a smartphone would also prompt a message on the wristwatch that a piece of mail has been received.
“You don’t always keep a mobile phone in your hands, you’ll put it in your bag. So it’s easier when you’re receiving a call to just tap on the watch,” Nakamura said.
“We don’t think that the iPhone will take the place of a watch. We see more possibilities for the watch,” he added.
“If you have a bluetooth watch and a smartphone then you don’t have to adjust the time when you’re traveling,” he said.
Casio’s latest watch will be available by the end of the year, with a launch due in the domestic market before broadening to other markets.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known
US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose up to 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan’s semiconductor exports to the US to encourage chip manufacturers to move their production facilities to the US, but experts are questioning his strategy, warning it could harm industries on both sides. “I’m very confused and surprised that the Trump administration would try and do this,” Bob O’Donnell, chief analyst and founder of TECHnalysis Research in California, said in an interview with the Central News Agency on Wednesday. “It seems to reflect the fact that they don’t understand how the semiconductor industry really works,” O’Donnell said. Economic sanctions would