US factories are closing. US manufacturing jobs are reappearing overseas. China’s industrial might is growing each year.
And it might seem as if the US doesn’t make world-class goods as well as some other nations.
“There’s no reason Europe or China should have the fastest trains, or the new factories that manufacture clean energy products,” US President Barack Obama said in his State of the Union policy address last week.
Yet the US remains by far the No. 1 manufacturing country. It out-produces No. 2 China by more than 40 percent. US manufacturers cranked out almost US$1.7 trillion in goods in 2009, according to the UN.
The story of US factories essentially boils down to this: They’ve managed to make more goods with fewer workers.
The US has lost almost 8 million factory jobs since manufacturing employment peaked at 19.6 million in mid-1979. US manufacturers have placed near the top of world rankings in productivity gains over the past three decades.
That higher productivity has meant a leaner manufacturing force that’s capitalized on efficiency.
“You can add more capability, but it doesn’t mean you necessarily have to hire hundreds of people,” said James Vitak, a spokesman for specialty chemical maker Ashland Inc.
The industry’s fortunes are brightening enough that US factories are finally adding jobs after years of shrinking their payrolls. Not a lot, but even a slight increase shows manufacturers are growing more confident. They added 136,000 workers last year — the first net increase since 1997.
What’s changed is that US manufacturers have abandoned products with thin profit margins, like consumer electronics, toys and shoes.
They’ve ceded that sector to China, Indonesia and other emerging nations with low labor costs.
Instead, US factories have seized upon complex and expensive goods requiring specialized labor: Industrial lathes, computer chips, fighter jets, healthcare products.
Consider Greatbatch Inc, which makes orthopedics and other medical goods. The company is expanding its manufacturing operations near Fort Wayne, Indiana. Greatbatch wanted to take advantage of a specialized workforce in northeastern Indiana, a hub of medical research and manufacturing.
“When you’re talking about medical devices, failure is not an option,” Greatbatch chief executive Thomas Hook said. “It’s a zero-mistake environment.”
“These products are customized and high-tech. They go into patients to keep them alive,” Hook added.
Hook said the US offers advantages over poorer, low-wage countries: Reliable supplies of electricity and water, decent roads. And some localities support businesses by providing infrastructure and vocational training for potential hires.
Centerline Machining & Grinding in Hobart, Wisconsin, which makes custom parts for manufacturers in the paper industry, plans to add to its staff of 26. However, it’s struggling to find the skilled tradesmen it needs for jobs paying US$18 to US$25 an hour.
Centerline chief executive Sara Dietzen laments that local vocational schools cut back training courses in recent years, having concluded that the future for manufacturing was dim. Not from her view it isn’t. For her company, output is all about speed.
“Our average customer wants a turnaround in less than three weeks,” Dietzen said. “You’re not going to get that in China.”
Still, economist Cliff Waldman of the industry research group Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI doubts that US factories will continue to expand their payrolls in the long run. Manufacturing, he said, is “not a job creator for the US, basically.”
Global competition will always force factory managers to try to replace expensive workers with machines or with low-wage labor overseas, Waldman said.
Mark Perry, a visiting scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, likened the loss of manufacturing jobs to the exodus of workers from farms between the 19th and 20th centuries. If that migration hadn’t happened, Perry said, “we’d still have millions of people working in agriculture. Now, we can employ fewer people in factories.”
However, the transition can be painful, he conceded.
The US remains No. 1 in global manufacturing, accounting for 18 percent of global manufacturing output in 2008, but China is catching up. Its share of manufacturing output jumped from about 6 percent in 1998 to 15 percent in 2008.
Critics have a ready explanation for that: unfair competition.
Robert Scott of the left-l-eaning Economic Policy Institute said China is cheating in world markets — keeping its currency artificially low to make Chinese products less expensive overseas and unfairly subsidizing its exporters.
Scott and other critics want to see the Obama administration support US manufacturers by pressuring Beijing to drop the subsidies and let its currency rise freely. A higher-valued Chinese currency would make US exports cheaper for Chinese consumers.
Dietzen said she wasn’t fazed by Chinese manufacturing. Some of her customers have placed orders with Chinese companies, she said, only to return, frustrated, to her company.
Chinese factories want mainly big orders. And they demand lots of time to fill them.
Dietzen said her clients are “finding when they get their parts back from China, they’re not always what they want. So we end up doing the work anyway.”
“A common misperception,” Hook said, is that the US doesn’t make anything anymore.
The reality is rather different.
“We need a highly skilled work force,” Hook said. “So it’s very advantageous to be in a country like the United States where people are educated and ready to be hired.”
Three experts in the high technology industry have said that US President Donald Trump’s pledge to impose higher tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors is part of an effort to force Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to the negotiating table. In a speech to Republicans on Jan. 27, Trump said he intends to impose tariffs on Taiwan to bring chip production to the US. “The incentive is going to be they’re not going to want to pay a 25, 50 or even a 100 percent tax,” he said. Darson Chiu (邱達生), an economics professor at Taichung-based Tunghai University and director-general of
‘LEGACY CHIPS’: Chinese companies have dramatically increased mature chip production capacity, but the West’s drive for secure supply chains offers a lifeline for Taiwan When Powerchip Technology Corp (力晶科技) entered a deal with the eastern Chinese city of Hefei in 2015 to set up a new chip foundry, it hoped the move would help provide better access to the promising Chinese market. However, nine years later, that Chinese foundry, Nexchip Semiconductor Corp (合晶集成), has become one of its biggest rivals in the legacy chip space, leveraging steep discounts after Beijing’s localization call forced Powerchip to give up the once-lucrative business making integrated circuits for Chinese flat panels. Nexchip is among Chinese foundries quickly winning market share in the crucial US$56.3 billion industry of so-called legacy
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) is reportedly making another pass at Nissan Motor Co, as the Japanese automaker's tie-up with Honda Motor Co falls apart. Nissan shares rose as much as 6 percent after Taiwan’s Central News Agency reported that Hon Hai chairman Young Liu (劉揚偉) instructed former Nissan executive Jun Seki to connect with French carmaker Renault SA, which holds about 36 percent of Nissan’s stock. Hon Hai, the Taiwanese iPhone-maker also known as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), was exploring an investment or buyout of Nissan last year, but backed off in December after the Japanese carmaker penned a deal
WASHINGTON POLICY: Tariffs of 10 percent or more and other new costs are tipped to hit shipments of small parcels, cutting export growth by 1.3 percentage points The decision by US President Donald Trump to ban Chinese companies from using a US tariff loophole would hit tens of billions of dollars of trade and reduce China’s economic growth this year, according to new estimates by economists at Nomura Holdings Inc. According to Nomura’s estimates, last year companies such as Shein (希音) and PDD Holdings Inc’s (拼多多控股) Temu shipped US$46 billion of small parcels to the US to take advantage of the rule that allows items with a declared value under US$800 to enter the US tariff-free. Tariffs of 10 percent or more and other new costs would slash such