In every boom cycle of its 107-year life, Ford Motor Co became complacent, unprepared for the inevitable bust in the auto business.
From the 1920s, when Ford lost its dominant position in the US because it was slow to update the Model T, to the 2000s, when it squandered billions in sport utility vehicle (SUV) profits and narrowly avoided bankruptcy, the company stuck with some strategies too long and didn’t pay enough attention to others.
“You often hear people at Ford say we can’t manage prosperity. I think it’s really quite different than that. It’s that we stop changing,” executive chairman Bill Ford told reporters in a recent interview.
Now, coming off a great past year, Bill Ford and Alan Mulally, the man who replaced Ford as CEO four years ago, say they are ready to break that cycle. Mulally has transformed the company into a simpler, nimbler organization that’s ready to react to change more quickly. Management experts aren’t so sure.
Thanks to strong new products and stumbles at rivals like General Motors and Toyota, Ford saw the industry’s biggest increases in market share. It had the best-selling vehicle — the F-Series pickup — and ended last year with its second straight annual profit. Ford’s US sales rose 20 percent, almost double the industrywide increase.
Mulally laid the groundwork. He cut brands and put in place a system that encourages managers to stay on top of market changes and other issues and communicate more openly with each other. It was a radical change at a company known for vicious infighting, where managers who pointed out problems were demonized. The healthier communication in Ford’s top ranks means it’s much more likely the company will hire its next CEO from within the company instead of turning to another outsider like Mulally.
Mulally, 65, won’t say when he plans to retire.
Management experts say it’s easy to talk about a willingness to change and much harder to do it, especially after pulling off a remarkable comeback like Mulally did after coming to Ford from airplane maker Boeing Co.
“Act two is always very, very hard,” said Joe Bower, a professor of business administration at Harvard Business School. “There are leaders who can do it, but it requires a tremendous willingness to imagine the need to rethink everything.”
Consider Ford in 2000. Flush with profits from SUVs and pickup trucks, it earned US$3.5 billion and bought the Land Rover luxury brand from BMW. Just one year later, hammered by the faltering economy and a slow reaction to a recall of Firestone tires used on its SUVs, Ford lost US$5 billion, announced a plan to cut 35,000 jobs and fired its CEO. Bill Ford held the reins until he hired Mulally.
Even now, Ford is facing some demons, including the recent recall of 600,000 Windstar minivans whose axles can break and questions from Consumer Reports, which says its MyFordTouch dashboard touchscreen is too distracting. The company says it reacted quickly to the Windstar issue and will study Consumer Reports’ findings, but believes its system is safe.
Ford and Mulally say management can respond faster to such crises because of changes Mulally made. He instituted weekly meetings with the entire 18-member executive team, ensuring that all of Ford’s leaders are constantly examining worldwide market conditions, future products and other issues. He also simplified the company’s mission, getting rid of excess brands like Land Rover, Volvo and Mercury so Ford could concentrate on its core Ford and Lincoln brands. The company is now consolidating Lincoln dealerships and trying to take the brand even further upscale to revive its flagging sales.
“Everybody now knows why they’re coming to Ford. They know why they’re coming in in the morning. They know what success looks like,” Mulally said.
Success, though, has a natural tendency to make a company smug.
Experts say management teams continue to do what made them prosperous, believing that the formula will always work. Bill Ford, 53, the great-grandson of company founder Henry Ford, says he’s seen it many times in his 31 years with the company.
“In the past, we would become static, and perhaps thought we had the secret formula and we were going to be slaves to it,” he said.
James Schrager, a professor at the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business, said it’s commendable Mulally and Ford recognize the company hasn’t changed quickly in the past. Mulally’s plan to save Ford was well done, but it hasn’t been tested yet by an unforeseen event that throws off the strategy, such as a huge gas price uptick, Schrager said.
“There’s a lot of things that happen outside of Ford’s control that determine if they go from boom to bust,” he said. “What I haven’t seen yet is if they know how to deal with these large exogenous changes that will happen to them from time to time.”
A few years ago, Ford said, the company would have based its product plans on fuel price predictions that could turn out to be wrong. Now it has a simpler vision: If you build high-quality, fuel-efficient cars and trucks in each segment, fuel prices don’t matter anymore.
“We have the product lineup and the engine lineup and the transmission lineup to give the customer whatever they want regardless of whatever the external factors are. That’s a freedom that’s hugely off our backs,” he said.
Ford and Mulally say simplifying production will also help them deal with external changes. For example, the new Focus sedan will eventually come in hybrid, plug-in hybrid, gas and electric versions, all built on the same Michigan assembly line. Ford will be able to switch quickly between them if it finds buyers prefer one technology over another.
Ford is also saving hundreds of millions of dollars by building one car for all worldwide markets. Previously, Ford’s global regions operated as independent companies, so cars developed in Europe would never make it to the US or Asia. Now, Ford is basing 10 vehicles off the new, European-developed Focus, including a small minivan that will be introduced at the Detroit auto show this week. Eighty percent of the parts those vehicles share are the same.
Those savings have helped Ford make money even though US and global auto sales are near historic lows and industry analysts say big profits are possible when economies recover and sales return to more normal levels.
Will the turnaround stay on track if Mulally decides to retire?
Mulally and Ford think so. The weekly meetings are training the team in all aspects of the business, they say, and the sharp elbows that used to characterize Ford’s executive ranks have given way to a spirit of collaboration. Ford won’t say for sure whether the next CEO will come from within the company, but the chances are high.
“At the old Ford, you had heroes and villains,” Ford said. “Now it’s: ‘OK, where do we have issues and how do we solve them?’”
RESTRUCTURING: Taichung and Taoyuan profited most from local firms moving back high-end manufacturing amid the US-China decoupling of trade ties, the ministry said The government’s “Invest in Taiwan” initiative might this year see NT$627.1 billion (US$21.7 billion) of investment pledges realized, with several firms raising stakes and two dropouts due to customer losses, Minister of Economic Affairs (MOEA) Wang Mei-hua (王美花) said yesterday. Wang made the statement at the monthly meeting of the Third Wednesday Club, a local trade group featuring the top 100 firms of each business sector. Since early last year, the government has launched three programs intended to help local companies grapple with US-China trade rows and the COVID-19 pandemic, mainly through moving production lines back to Taiwan. Thus far, the ministry
JOBS AT RISK? Most Cathay Dragon routes are to be operated by Cathay Pacific or a subsidiary, but it was unclear how Taiwanese workers would be affected Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd (國泰航空) yesterday said it is planning new flight services for Taiwan as it announced a corporate restructuring that included the shutdown of its regional subsidiary, Cathay Dragon (國泰港龍), and could lead to job cuts in Taiwan. Cathay Pacific said the shutdown means that the one round-trip service between Taichung and Hong Kong per day and seven round-trip services between Kaohsiung and Hong Kong operated by Cathay Dragon prior to the COVID-19 pandemic would be terminated. “The parent company is planning a new schedule between Taiwan and Hong Kong,” Cathay Pacific assistant manager for corporate communications Moses Hou (侯恩錫)
OVERHEATED MARKET?: The gauge would be designed to provide more reliable information than private-sector data, and help improve policymaking, the council said The National Development Council (NDC) is considering creating a business climate index on Taiwan’s property market, allowing policymakers to better monitor market movements and intervene if necessary, NDC Minister Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) said yesterday. Kung made the remarks at a meeting of the legislature’s Economic Committee where lawmakers from across party lines voiced concerns about housing price hikes driven by capital repatriation. Kung said that the council is assessing the possibility of creating an index designed to provide more accountable and transparent information than data provided by private-sector market analysts, and could help improve policymaking. The council would compile a report on
STOCK MARKETS TAIEX closes slightly higher The TAIEX closed slightly higher yesterday as market sentiment remained cautious over the Nov. 3 US presidential election. Contract chipmaker Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) was again the anchor stabilizing the broader market, preventing the main board from falling into negative territory at the end of the session, dealers said. The TAIEX closed up 14.88 points, or 0.12 percent, at 12,877.25, on turnover of NT$167.982 billion (US$5.81 billion). TSMC, the most heavily weighted stock on the local market, rose 0.44 percent after fluctuating between NT$451 and NT$456. The semiconductor subindex and the bellwether electronics sector