The Big Three credit rating agencies, under fire for failing to anticipate the global financial crisis, have spurred new players to offer alternatives, but the trio’s dominance of the sector seems secure for the moment, analysts said.
“It’s a matter of at the same time introducing more competition while making investors less sensitive to the ratings,” said Jerome Cazes, head of the French credit insurer Coface.
Coface and another French insurer, Euler Hermes, along with US entities Egan Jones, DBRS and Meredith Whitney Advisory Group, are all anxious to do battle with the Big Three — Moody’s Investors Service, Fitch Ratings and Standard and Poor’s.
US DOWNGRADED
The Chinese agency, Dagon Global Credit Rating (大公國際信評), has also attracted attention after it downgraded the US for its massive debt overhang.
“Anything that introduces more competition to the ratings is useful because more diversity is needed if the markets are to work better,” economist Michel Aglietta said.
Governments and companies trying to raise money on financial markets traditionally ask a ratings agency to assess their capacity to pay their debt. The rating then helps them in their appeal to investors, particularly those based in other countries.
NEWCOMERS
The newcomer agencies seeking to bolster their positions want to evaluate the financial health of companies and certain public bodies rather than that of sovereign states.
And unlike the Big Three, they are interested in concentrating on a specific region. Meredith Whiney has targeted the US, while Euler Hermes is focused on Germany.
“It is going to be difficult for them because the ratings -business will never be a free market,” Aglietta said.
However, he noted that some of the new agencies that have made an impact in a specific sector, such as Coface in exports or Meredith Whitney in banking, are likely to do well.
“They already have a client base where they enjoy credibility,” he said.
Officially, Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s and Fitch appear to have welcomed the competition.
However, it is also evident that the obstacles confronting the new players suggest that the trio can be confident about holding on to their top status.
BACKING
The newcomers must first of all get the backing of regulatory bodies, which some analysts say is a major hurdle for them.
The EU’s executive commission has said it supports the emergence of smaller ratings agencies in order to ensure greater transparency in the market.
Government authorities have argued that Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch aggravated the financial crisis by assigning positive ratings to complex financial instruments that proved to be unreliable.
The agencies have also been faulted for possible conflict of interest in that they are sometimes paid by the entities they are asked to rate.
CRITICAL
Nonetheless, the newcomers must still convince borrowers that there are indeed alternatives to the Big Three, whose stamp of approval is considered critical.
“All that is to say that conditions are not yet ripe for a competitive market,” Aglietta said.
Under the circumstances, analysts have called for the creation of public ratings agencies or even government support for the new players.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known
A move by US President Donald Trump to slap a 25 percent tariff on all steel imports is expected to place Taiwan-made steel, which already has a 25 percent tariff, on an equal footing, the Taiwan Steel & Iron Industries Association said yesterday. Speaking with CNA, association chairman Hwang Chien-chih (黃建智) said such an equal footing is expected to boost Taiwan’s competitive edge against other countries in the US market, describing the tariffs as "positive" for Taiwanese steel exporters. On Monday, Trump signed two executive orders imposing the new metal tariffs on imported steel and aluminum with no exceptions and exemptions, effective