A wave of environmental protests in Taiwan, sometimes pitting demonstrators against police, has pushed the government to speed up new green rules to protect the environment without harming economic growth.
Economists say the stricter rules will ultimately raise the competitiveness of the US$416 billion economy against greener Asian rivals and boost its corporate image among eco-conscious Western consumers.
“People realize the short-term interests from economic development, but worry long term about environmental protection, so we need to attain a balance,” Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration Minister Stephen Shen (沈世宏) said.
Taiwan industrialized in the 1980s with little public protest to become one of Asia’s four economic dragons. Now, it is working on more transparent environmental reviews for new projects and tougher energy laws, including a tax regime and carbon reduction targets for 2020, 2025 and possibly 2050.
Officials also want to phase out traditional polluting industries and join international carbon trading schemes.
Government action follows a spate of protests, including an 8,000-strong rally on Nov. 13 denouncing a planned 300,000 barrels-per-day oil refinery complex on Taiwan’s west coast that could foul the air and hurt local dolphins.
Earlier outcries had already extended an environmental impact review of the US$36 billion Kuokuang Petrochemical Technology Co (國光石化科技) refinery project led by CPC Corp, Taiwan (台灣中油).
“The government hasn’t told citizens why we absolutely need this plant,” said Kan Chen-yi (甘宸宜), secretary of a conservation group behind the protest. “It could spread pollution all over Taiwan, hurt dolphins and pollute the water.”
Three fires in six months earlier in the year at a giant refinery run by Formosa Petrochemicals Corp (台塑石化) led to calls for its closure. Some protests sparked clashes with police.
In another case, farmers and environmentalists filed a lawsuit to block expansion of a science park in central Taiwan. The park was asked to reevaluate the environmental impacts and resubmit plans, the Government -Information Office said.
The new measures will oblige the densely populated Taiwan’s high-tech, petrochemical and textile companies to invest in upgrading factories.
However, officials also hope for a latent dividend — boosted corporate images and reduced energy bills.
“In the short term, in terms of costs, companies may look at the laws unfavorably, but these measures will be looked at very favorably by consumers in the United States,” said Liu Li-gang (劉利剛), head of China economic research with ANZ in Hong Kong.
Stronger environmental laws are also expected to induce new investment as local startups or foreign firms want to see specifics on rules before making a -commitment. Taiwan has long been criticized for murky or cumbersome business procedures.
The president of the US Chamber of Commerce says the 900-member body has questioned the transparency of Taiwan’s environmental impact assessment methods.
“Firms don’t want to put money into a plant and then find themselves responding to unclear or inconsistently applied rules,” said Mark Williams, senior China economist with Capital Economics in London.
Taiwan is concerned about its competition.
South Korea, heavily reliant on exports, has proposed legislation to launch a carbon emissions trading scheme this year, while Japan aims to pass a climate bill setting rigorous emissions targets.
Many Taiwanese companies are not waiting to be told.
They have cut emissions or recycled wastewater on their own, industry associations say, and expect to do more over the next five years.
The world’s biggest contract chipmaker, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), says it voluntarily cut perfluorocarbon emissions, a major greenhouse gas often used in medical applications, in 2001 and slashed its carbon emissions output in 2005.
“We have seen that consumers increasingly want to buy green products,” TSMC’s top publicist, Michael Kramer, said in a statement. “And naturally, conserving electricity and water as well as recycling materials reduces our costs.”
Three experts in the high technology industry have said that US President Donald Trump’s pledge to impose higher tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors is part of an effort to force Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to the negotiating table. In a speech to Republicans on Jan. 27, Trump said he intends to impose tariffs on Taiwan to bring chip production to the US. “The incentive is going to be they’re not going to want to pay a 25, 50 or even a 100 percent tax,” he said. Darson Chiu (邱達生), an economics professor at Taichung-based Tunghai University and director-general of
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) is reportedly making another pass at Nissan Motor Co, as the Japanese automaker's tie-up with Honda Motor Co falls apart. Nissan shares rose as much as 6 percent after Taiwan’s Central News Agency reported that Hon Hai chairman Young Liu (劉揚偉) instructed former Nissan executive Jun Seki to connect with French carmaker Renault SA, which holds about 36 percent of Nissan’s stock. Hon Hai, the Taiwanese iPhone-maker also known as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), was exploring an investment or buyout of Nissan last year, but backed off in December after the Japanese carmaker penned a deal
SUPPORT: The government said it would help firms deal with supply disruptions, after Trump signed orders imposing tariffs of 25 percent on imports from Canada and Mexico The government pledged to help companies with operations in Mexico, such as iPhone assembler Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密), also known as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), shift production lines and investment if needed to deal with higher US tariffs. The Ministry of Economic Affairs yesterday announced measures to help local firms cope with the US tariff increases on Canada, Mexico, China and other potential areas. The ministry said that it would establish an investment and trade service center in the US to help Taiwanese firms assess the investment environment in different US states, plan supply chain relocation strategies and
WASHINGTON POLICY: Tariffs of 10 percent or more and other new costs are tipped to hit shipments of small parcels, cutting export growth by 1.3 percentage points The decision by US President Donald Trump to ban Chinese companies from using a US tariff loophole would hit tens of billions of dollars of trade and reduce China’s economic growth this year, according to new estimates by economists at Nomura Holdings Inc. According to Nomura’s estimates, last year companies such as Shein (希音) and PDD Holdings Inc’s (拼多多控股) Temu shipped US$46 billion of small parcels to the US to take advantage of the rule that allows items with a declared value under US$800 to enter the US tariff-free. Tariffs of 10 percent or more and other new costs would slash such