Japanese police had no comment yesterday after a US federal grand jury indicted three former Japanese airline executives accused of fixing air cargo shipment rates to and from the US.
“We cannot comment on individual cases in principle. We cannot say whether we have received any request from US authorities over the case,” a National Police Department spokeswomen said.
US investigators have probed claims that in the late 1990s and early 2000s, industry members agreed to fix cargo rates on scheduled flights. The probe has now ensnared 19 airlines and 17 executives.
The latest US indictment named Takao Fukuchi, a former president of the cargo sales division of Japan Airlines (JAL), and Yoshio Kunugi and Naoshige Makino, both former senior executives of Nippon Cargo Airlines.
The two companies, which have both already faced separate charges over the bid-rigging deal, said they were unaware of the executives’ whereabouts.
“There has been no change in our previous agreement to jointly pay penalties with Nippon Cargo Airlines, but we cannot comment on the individual case as it is a matter between US authorities and them. All we can say is that our company is going to strengthen our compliance,” a JAL spokesman said.
The executives each face up to 10 years behind bars and at least US$1 million in fines if found guilty.
Other airlines accused include Air France, All Nippon Airways, British Airways, Cathay Pacific, China Airlines (中華航空), Northwest Airlines and Qantas Airways.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
‘LEGACY CHIPS’: Chinese companies have dramatically increased mature chip production capacity, but the West’s drive for secure supply chains offers a lifeline for Taiwan When Powerchip Technology Corp (力晶科技) entered a deal with the eastern Chinese city of Hefei in 2015 to set up a new chip foundry, it hoped the move would help provide better access to the promising Chinese market. However, nine years later, that Chinese foundry, Nexchip Semiconductor Corp (合晶集成), has become one of its biggest rivals in the legacy chip space, leveraging steep discounts after Beijing’s localization call forced Powerchip to give up the once-lucrative business making integrated circuits for Chinese flat panels. Nexchip is among Chinese foundries quickly winning market share in the crucial US$56.3 billion industry of so-called legacy
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known