EU leaders yesterday sought to reassure bondholders unnerved by Ireland’s fiscal problems they would not be forced to take a writedown, but Ireland’s prime minister said recent French and German comments had aggravated the problem.
A statement by France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Britain was issued at the G20 summit in Seoul after spreads on Irish 10-year government bonds over German bunds surged to a record high, hitting the debt of Portugal and Spain and the euro.
“Whatever the debate within the euro area about the future permanent crisis resolution mechanism and the potential private sector involvement in that mechanism, we are clear that this does not apply to any outstanding debt and any programme under current instruments,” the statement said.
Irish Prime Minister Brian Cowen told the Irish Independent newspaper that the stance of some EU members, and particularly comments by Germany and France, had complicated his efforts to battle a financial crisis that threatens his government.
CONSEQUENCES
“It hasn’t been helpful,” he said, referring to German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s intervention. “What has been said there has had, I think, an unforeseen consequence, perhaps.”
“I’m not suggesting that anything was said for the purposes of causing further difficulty,” he said in the interview, but added: “The consequence that the market has taken from it is to question the commitment to the repayment of debt.”
He said bond markets were “behaving irrationally” and Irish interest rates had jumped 1 percent on Wednesday for no reason.
The EU is looking at new rules for debt issued from 2013 that may entail private investors rolling over existing debts or to bear their share of losses, as has been the case in new contracts written into debt programs of some emerging market issuers.
Ireland forced its way onto the G20 agenda as investors fretted it could default as a result of the rising costs of its bank rescue program that has already driven its budget deficit to 32 percent of GDP.
“I spent a bunch of time, and I’m sure other ministers did, talking about developments in Europe. But that’s what you’d expect,” a senior US official said, in response to a question about Ireland.
So far, Ireland has not requested financial aid.
Dublin’s fiscal woes have been triggered by concerns that it will need to spend more to rescue its stricken banking system.
On Thursday, the cost of insuring Irish debt against default hit a record high and the 10-year Irish bond spread over equivalent German debt — another measure of perceived risk — reached 685 basis points, the highest since the euro was introduced.
A Reuters poll showed that 20 of 30 economists surveyed believed Ireland would need a bailout of about 48 billion euros (US$65.4 billion) before the end of next year.
MEMORIES OF GREECE
The crisis in Ireland has revived memories of Greece’s brush with default earlier this year that required combined EU and IMF intervention costing 110 billion euros and which sparked a selloff in the euro and questions over the single currency’s viability.
Since then the euro zone has set up a 440 billion euros sovereign rescue fund backed by another 310 billion euros of IMF and EU funds that could be deployed in countries such as Ireland to stem a run on markets.
Portugal, Spain and Italy are also seen as vulnerable to any troubles in Ireland as investors shun risky euro zone assets.
“The effects of euro zone peripheral bond concerns are spreading through euro zone markets and hitting risk appetite in the process,” said Mitul Kotecha, global head of currency strategy with Credit Agricole CIB in Hong Kong.
“The euro is a clear casualty, having dropped further against the US dollar and versus other currencies,” Kotecha said.
The euro fell below US$1.36 yesterday for the first time since late September.
Three experts in the high technology industry have said that US President Donald Trump’s pledge to impose higher tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors is part of an effort to force Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to the negotiating table. In a speech to Republicans on Jan. 27, Trump said he intends to impose tariffs on Taiwan to bring chip production to the US. “The incentive is going to be they’re not going to want to pay a 25, 50 or even a 100 percent tax,” he said. Darson Chiu (邱達生), an economics professor at Taichung-based Tunghai University and director-general of
‘LEGACY CHIPS’: Chinese companies have dramatically increased mature chip production capacity, but the West’s drive for secure supply chains offers a lifeline for Taiwan When Powerchip Technology Corp (力晶科技) entered a deal with the eastern Chinese city of Hefei in 2015 to set up a new chip foundry, it hoped the move would help provide better access to the promising Chinese market. However, nine years later, that Chinese foundry, Nexchip Semiconductor Corp (合晶集成), has become one of its biggest rivals in the legacy chip space, leveraging steep discounts after Beijing’s localization call forced Powerchip to give up the once-lucrative business making integrated circuits for Chinese flat panels. Nexchip is among Chinese foundries quickly winning market share in the crucial US$56.3 billion industry of so-called legacy
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in