Steelmakers, paying 90 percent more for iron ore, have to raise prices to pass on the higher raw material costs, the World Steel Association (WSA) said.
The move by iron ore exporters this year to abandon a 40-year custom of setting annual prices in favor of quarterly contracts is a “very negative trend,” WSA chairman Paolo Rocca said in an interview in Beijing yesterday.
The change and the higher costs that it entails “will affect our customers,” he said.
The association last month called on authorities globally to examine the iron ore market after Brazil’s Vale SA won a 90 percent price increase from Japanese mills for quarterly contracts starting on April 1.
Posco, Asia’s third-biggest steelmaker, raised prices for its products this month by as much as 25 percent because of escalating costs. In Taiwan, China Steel Corp (中鋼), the nation’s biggest steelmaker, has raised prices three times this year, a 17.8 percent increase in total, and said last month more increases were in the pipeline for the third quarter.
“I think we have no alternative but to transfer the increase in costs to the market,” Rocca said.
Quarterly ore pricing “will [make] our industry less competitive against the aluminum and raw material industries. This will affect our industry,” he said.
Vale, BHP Billiton Ltd and Rio Tinto Group account for about two thirds of the globally traded iron ore market, estimated at US$200 billion a year, according to Credit Suisse Group.
The Chinese government last month said it was investigating the possibility that the three companies may be monopolizing supplies of the steelmaking ingredient.
Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton, the second and third-largest exporters of the material, are also proposing combining their operations in Australia into a 50-50 joint venture to save at least US$10 billion. The proposal is under review by competition authorities in Europe, Australia, South Korea and China.
The combination will “severely hamper our steel industry, as this will create excess concentration,” Rocca said.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday said that its investment plan in Arizona is going according to schedule, following a local media report claiming that the company is planning to break ground on its third wafer fab in the US in June. In a statement, TSMC said it does not comment on market speculation, but that its investments in Arizona are proceeding well. TSMC is investing more than US$65 billion in Arizona to build three advanced wafer fabs. The first one has started production using the 4-nanometer (nm) process, while the second one would start mass production using the
US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose up to 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan’s semiconductor exports to the US to encourage chip manufacturers to move their production facilities to the US, but experts are questioning his strategy, warning it could harm industries on both sides. “I’m very confused and surprised that the Trump administration would try and do this,” Bob O’Donnell, chief analyst and founder of TECHnalysis Research in California, said in an interview with the Central News Agency on Wednesday. “It seems to reflect the fact that they don’t understand how the semiconductor industry really works,” O’Donnell said. Economic sanctions would
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known