Clients with more than US$5.5 billion invested in hedge funds controlled by Cerberus Capital Management have told the firm that they want their money back.
About 71 percent of the investors in the two Cerberus Partners funds want their assets moved into a new vehicle that will be liquidated as market conditions improve, Stephen Feinberg, who runs Cerberus, wrote in a letter to clients delivered late on Thursday.
The withdrawals would leave about US$2.2 billion of assets in the funds.
PHOTO: NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE
“We have been surprised by this response,” Feinberg and his cofounder, William Richter, wrote in the letter, which was first reported by the Wall Street Journal on Friday.
A spokesman for Cerberus, which oversees about US$24 billion in assets, declined to comment.
While Feinberg said most of the firm’s clients continued to support the investment strategy, the mass exodus of investors is another black eye for the firm. The firm, which prefers to operate out of the public eye, has suffered from several prominent investments — most notably its investment in Chrysler — that left the funds down 24.5 percent last year.
Some of those positions have recovered slightly, but the funds were unable to join the broad market recovery this year because they had little new cash to invest, a person close to the firm said.
Clients were also upset at the firm for suspending withdrawal requests at the end of last year, a move made by other funds with similarly poor performance. More than half of the clients were so-called funds of hedge funds, which experienced widespread redemptions of their own last year.
Last month, Cerberus decided to restructure the funds, offering clients who chose not to liquidate the ability to roll any future profits into a new hedge fund with sharply reduced fees.
But the incentives did not seem to work, an indication that Cerberus’ 17-year track record of making money for clients had suffered in the downturn.
Feinberg has told investors that he still believed the investments in the Cerberus Partners funds would be profitable over time and that he did not want to sell securities and other assets in a down market.
But the loss of fee income on more than US$5.5 billion in capital could prompt talented traders and investment professionals to leave for better-paying firms. Investors who are considering staying with the firm are also concerned that the liquidations will push down the value of their investments as they are sold off.
“We are embarrassed and disappointed by our 2008 performance, and we feel an obligation to you to turn this around,” Feinberg said in the letter last month announcing the restructuring. “But we just don’t know when and how much pain we must take before that happens.”
The comments differ markedly from Feinberg’s confident tone last September when he told investors that “none of our problem positions are large enough to create a real return problem for the fund.”
Along with Chrysler, those “problem positions” included high-profile bets on GMAC and the residential mortgage company ResCap. Those have taken a toll on Cerberus’ reputation.
“We never intended to receive the publicity surrounding those investments,” Feinberg wrote in the letter.
Semiconductor shares in China surged yesterday after Reuters reported the US had ordered chipmaking giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to halt shipments of advanced chips to Chinese customers, which investors believe could accelerate Beijing’s self-reliance efforts. TSMC yesterday started to suspend shipments of certain sophisticated chips to some Chinese clients after receiving a letter from the US Department of Commerce imposing export restrictions on those products, Reuters reported on Sunday, citing an unnamed source. The US imposed export restrictions on TSMC’s 7-nanometer or more advanced designs, Reuters reported. Investors figured that would encourage authorities to support China’s industry and bought shares
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process