Mon, Aug 10, 2009 page11

• Chamber at odds with Obama’s policies

  • AP
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  If US President Barack Obama wants to take the measure of his opposition, he only has to glance across Lafayette Park from the White House. There, behind 10 massive Corinthian columns, is the headquarters of the US Chamber of Commerce — a leading critic of the administration’s healthcare and banking overhaul plans.

  A fortress for the business community, the chamber has emerged as a multitasking, multimillion dollar defender of the private sector against presidential initiatives. As lawmakers spend time at home during this month’s vacation hearing from constituents, the chamber is adding its own heat to the season.

  There’s a US$2 million campaign against Obama’s proposals that would make the government a competitor in the health insurance market. It’s trying to make the case for insurers, which oppose a government-run insurance alternative, but want to work with the White House to mandate coverage for all.

  The chamber also has become a pointed critic of a White House plan to create a consumer finance protection agency and is assembling finance sector trade groups to push for a delay in legislation.

  With 3 million members, the chamber is working with local and regional affiliates on letter-writing campaigns to lawmakers and plans to track their public appearances to make sure they hear the chamber’s point of view.

  The summer effort is just a start.

  The group is also readying an ambitious US$100 million campaign to advocate for businesses and a free enterprise system, which chamber officials believe is under attack. The chamber is putting lawmakers on notice — the issues campaign will be timed to lead into next year’s congressional elections.

  “You’ve got an administration pushing the federal government into a bigger and bigger footprint,” said Bruce Josten, the chamber’s chief lobbyist. “CEOs start to get concerned when they see that. We felt we needed someone to step into this space.”

  Critics point out the chamber objects to government interference in the private sector even though it supported federal efforts to rescue the financial industry with hundreds of billions of dollars and to bail out struggling automakers. What’s more, the chamber is setting itself up as a foil to the administration on healthcare, while insurers and the health industry seek to negotiate with the White House.

  As part of its healthcare effort, the chamber is running newspaper and online ads against a government-run insurance option that are targeted at moderate Democrats and Republicans in five states. On banking rules, it recently organized the financial industry to call for a delay in legislation that would set up a consumer protection agency.

  The chamber stands out for the bluntness of its criticism.

  A trade group representing drug manufacturers, for instance, is running an ad broadly supporting healthcare changes. In a reversal, the ad features a fictional couple, Harry and Louise, who appeared in ads by the insurance industry in 1993 opposed to former president Bill Clinton’s health plan.

  The insurance industry opposes a government-run alternative to private insurers, but instead of criticizing, the US’ Health Insurance Plans is running ads encouraging universal coverage and calling for “bipartisan reforms.”

  “We’ve been focusing on what we’re for,” said Robert Zirkelbach, the group’s spokesman.

  Wary of having the chamber identified as an uncompromising opponent of healthcare change, Josten caused a stir recently with a letter to the Senate Finance Committee urging action on a bipartisan proposal before this month’s recess.

  Republican leaders have demanded that the pace of deliberations slow down, but Josten said: “The business community vitally needs better policy alternatives to be proposed by Congress.”

  Josten said he also wanted to “send a signal of what is passable.”

  What’s more, he said, if the committee reached a compromise now, the chamber’s policy team would have all of this month to scrutinize it.

  “If it’s a terrible bill, it gives me a target,” he said.

  The healthcare issue has become prominent on airwaves. So far, the administration has a significant spending advantage, getting support from Organizing for America, which grew out of Obama’s presidential campaign and is now a subsidiary of the Democratic National Committee, and from labor and liberal allies.

  Evan Tracey, who tracks political advertising as president of the Campaign Media Analysis Group, said that as of the first week of this month, the amount spent on ads supporting an Obama-styled plan totaled more than US$22 million, compared with more than US$8 million against it.

  One of the leading spenders against Obama’s plan is Conservatives for Patients Rights, a group led and largely financed by Rick Scott, a former hospital executive. Scott was chief executive of Columbia/HCA, a healthcare company that pleaded guilty to overbilling charges.

  Tracey identified an additional US$22 million in ads — many from the drug or insurance industries — that advocate changes in healthcare, without specifying support for a particular proposal.

  The chamber’s efforts to limit the reach of Obama’s banking regulation plans is less visible, matching the issue’s lower profile with the public, but the chamber wasted no time taking on the role of overarching critic, while the various sectors in the financial industry took issue with more specific aspects of Obama’s plans.

  The chamber has been especially critical of a proposed agency to regulate consumer financial products, such as credit cards and bank loans. It has also objected to proposals that would require shareholders to vote on executive pay packages, even if the votes are nonbinding.

  “The chamber on this bill has drawn the line in the sand very early on,” said Tom Quaadman, who heads the chamber’s Center for Capital Markets Competitiveness. “We have made a decision that we are going to be involved in this fight, that we’re going to be involved in it in a very big way.”

  Heather Booth, the campaign director of a pro-regulation coalition of labor and consumer activists called Americans for Financial Reform, said the confrontation over a consumer agency is “being treated as a showdown.”

  The organization has held events outside local chambers of commerce and is putting pressure on moderate and conservative Democrats.

  “[Opponents] are frightening businesses that otherwise would have an interest in reform,” Booth said.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Bologna advance to face AC Milan in Coppa final

  • 2

    Wild’s top line too much for Vegas Golden Knights

  • 3

    Taiwan draws attention at World Expo

  • 4

    Wolves hold off Lakers 116-104 to take series lead

  • 5

    Argentina’s Pope Francis gets stadium and a jersey