Siliconware Precision Industries Co (矽品精密), the nation's second-biggest chip tester and packager, said yesterday its net income reached NT$17.51 billion (US$543 million) last year, or NT$5.78 earnings per share, up 31.34 percent from NT$13.33 billion in 2006.
Despite growing concern over the global economy, the company said it remained optimistic about prospects for this year, citing continued demand for handsets, PCs and consumer electronics as well as lower capital spending by major industry players, which results in stable prices.
In the fourth quarter, the company's net income dropped 5.36 percent to NT$4.79 billion from NT$5.06 billion in the previous quarter. Earnings per share were NT$1.57 for the quarter, the company said in a statement. Fourth-quarter revenue dropped 1 percent from the previous quarter to NT$17.73 billion, it said.
Siliconware shares have dropped 19.39 percent so far this year and closed at NT$47 yesterday on the Taiwan Stock Exchange.
Citigroup reiterated a buy rating on Siliconware, with a target price of NT$72, the US investment bank's analyst Andrew Lu (
The analyst said Siliconware's forecast of a decline of 10 to 13 percent in first-quarter sales from last quarter was in line with market estimates.
For this year, Lu said, the company may see 12 percent revenue growth from last year.
Without offering an exact prediction, Siliconware said this year's growth may slow from annual growth of 15 percent for last year.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
‘LEGACY CHIPS’: Chinese companies have dramatically increased mature chip production capacity, but the West’s drive for secure supply chains offers a lifeline for Taiwan When Powerchip Technology Corp (力晶科技) entered a deal with the eastern Chinese city of Hefei in 2015 to set up a new chip foundry, it hoped the move would help provide better access to the promising Chinese market. However, nine years later, that Chinese foundry, Nexchip Semiconductor Corp (合晶集成), has become one of its biggest rivals in the legacy chip space, leveraging steep discounts after Beijing’s localization call forced Powerchip to give up the once-lucrative business making integrated circuits for Chinese flat panels. Nexchip is among Chinese foundries quickly winning market share in the crucial US$56.3 billion industry of so-called legacy
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known