The European Central Bank (ECB) held its main interest rates steady yesterday against a background of rising inflation and slowing growth, shortly after the Bank of England (BoE) did the same.
The benchmark borrowing rate for the now 15-nation single currency zone remained at 4.0 percent as the ECB measured twin threats from a spike in oil and food prices coupled with a banking crisis that followed the collapse of the US subprime housing market.
Of the two issues, inflation was a greater concern to ECB policy makers meeting in Frankfurt, among whom figured for the first time central bank governors from Cyprus and Malta, which adopted the euro on Jan. 1.
"Inflation growth is still the prime worry," ING analyst Peter Vanden Houte said.
In Britain, the BoE held its main interest rate at 5.50 percent after cutting it last month for the first first time in more than two years owing to a dogged global credit squeeze that threatens to derail economic growth.
"After the ECB raised interest rates to a roughly neutral 4.0 percent in June, the strong euro and the lingering turmoil in money and credit markets will likely keep the central bank on hold until September 2008," said Holger Schmieding, senior European economist at Bank of America.
The ECB also held the deposit rate and the marginal lending rate unchanged at 3 percent and 5 percent respectively.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
‘LEGACY CHIPS’: Chinese companies have dramatically increased mature chip production capacity, but the West’s drive for secure supply chains offers a lifeline for Taiwan When Powerchip Technology Corp (力晶科技) entered a deal with the eastern Chinese city of Hefei in 2015 to set up a new chip foundry, it hoped the move would help provide better access to the promising Chinese market. However, nine years later, that Chinese foundry, Nexchip Semiconductor Corp (合晶集成), has become one of its biggest rivals in the legacy chip space, leveraging steep discounts after Beijing’s localization call forced Powerchip to give up the once-lucrative business making integrated circuits for Chinese flat panels. Nexchip is among Chinese foundries quickly winning market share in the crucial US$56.3 billion industry of so-called legacy
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known