Yahoo Inc's recently resurgent stock retreated by more than 5 percent on Friday amid fears that a setback in a lucrative partnership with AT&T Inc will undercut the anticipated gains from an overhaul of the Web portal's advertising platform.
The sell-off was triggered by an unconfirmed report in the Wall Street Journal that AT&T wants to stop giving Yahoo a slice of the subscriber fees from a six-year-old co-branding agreement to sell Internet access in most of the country.
If AT&T gets its way, Yahoo would have to be satisfied with whatever money it could make by selling its own online products, such as digital music or matchmaking services, to subscribers of the joint service.
In a statement issued late on Friday, AT&T and Yahoo said they were constantly examining ways to adapt to changing market conditions. Neither company addressed the substance of the Journal's report, which the statement described as "speculation."
"As we continue our conversations, we have a common goal to increase the economic benefits for both parties," Yahoo chairman Terry Semel said.
By the time Semel spoke, investors had already drawn their own negative conclusions. Yahoo shares dropped US$1.59, or 5.2 percent, to close at US$29.12 on the NASDAQ Stock Market.
Before Friday's downturn, Yahoo's stock had climbed by 20 percent this year, rebounding from a horrible performance last year. That reflected Wall Street's widespread belief that Yahoo will prosper from a month-old upgrade to its formula for linking ads to search requests.
But a reshuffling of the AT&T deal would deliver a substantial blow.
Under the current terms of the contract, AT&T is believed to pay Yahoo US$200 million to US$250 million annually, accounting for more than 25 percent of the US$798 million in total fees that the Internet powerhouse collected last year.
Most of Yahoo's revenue -- which totaled US$6.4 billion last year -- comes from advertising.
Compounding the pain, Yahoo's profit margins on the AT&T partnership are much higher than on many of its other services because the telecommunications carrier handles most of the heavy lifting.
Standard & Poor's analyst Scott Kessler estimated the AT&T deal generated somewhere between US$30 million to US$70 million, or US$0.02 to US$0.05 per share, of Yahoo's profit for last year of US$751 million.
Analysts expect Yahoo to earn nearly US$780 million, or US$0.54 per share, this year.
The damage to Yahoo could be worse if its other major Internet access partners -- Verizon Communications Inc, BT Group PLC and Rogers Communications Inc -- follow AT&T's lead when they renegotiate their contracts.
Yahoo hasn't publicly disclosed the length of the contracts with its Internet access partners, but the AT&T alliance reportedly expires in April next year.
Friday's news woke up many investors who thought Yahoo had turned the corner after slowing revenue growth and competitive challenges posed by increasingly popular Internet hangouts like MySpace.com contributed to last year's 35 percent decline in Yahoo's stock price.
An improved advertising system known as "Panama" -- unveiled on Feb. 5 after a three-month delay -- has become the foundation for Yahoo's turnaround hopes. The upgrade is supposed to begin boosting Yahoo's profit in the second half of this year -- a prospect that now looks shakier, Kessler said.
"A lot of people have gotten scared again and are starting to realize that they have been pinning their hopes on the promise of something that is still uncertain," he said.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known
A move by US President Donald Trump to slap a 25 percent tariff on all steel imports is expected to place Taiwan-made steel, which already has a 25 percent tariff, on an equal footing, the Taiwan Steel & Iron Industries Association said yesterday. Speaking with CNA, association chairman Hwang Chien-chih (黃建智) said such an equal footing is expected to boost Taiwan’s competitive edge against other countries in the US market, describing the tariffs as "positive" for Taiwanese steel exporters. On Monday, Trump signed two executive orders imposing the new metal tariffs on imported steel and aluminum with no exceptions and exemptions, effective