Far Eastern International Bank (
While discussions with DBS have been taking place for the past two to three years, "no conclusion has been reached," the company said in a statement to the Taiwan Stock Exchange on Thursday. Far Eastern is the banking arm of Far Eastern Group (遠東集團), which controls the nation's largest textile company and has units in shipping, mobile-phone services and retailing.
Far Eastern didn't define "strategic alliance" or say if it seeks partnerships only with overseas banks. Neither did it provide more details on its talks with DBS.
The government has encouraged mergers and acquisitions in the financial sector to reduce the number of banks in the nation. Far Eastern said in June that it was in initial talks with potential buyers, and in October said it may sell a majority stake for the right price.
The bank's shares surged up to the daily limit on Jan. 25 after a news report said it may sell a 51 percent stake to ABN Amro Holdings NV, which Far Eastern denied.
Shares of Far Eastern declined by 0.83 percent to close at NT$17.9 on the Taiwan Stock Exchange on Wednesday.
The company's statement yesterday came after the Chinese language Commercial Times reported that DBS may buy a stake in the the bank after completing a due diligence.
"It's our policy not to comment on market speculation or M and A activity," Jenny Lee, a DBS spokeswoman said in a phone interview.
Far Eastern, one of 16 lenders established in the early 1990s after the government liberalized the banking industry.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known
US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose up to 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan’s semiconductor exports to the US to encourage chip manufacturers to move their production facilities to the US, but experts are questioning his strategy, warning it could harm industries on both sides. “I’m very confused and surprised that the Trump administration would try and do this,” Bob O’Donnell, chief analyst and founder of TECHnalysis Research in California, said in an interview with the Central News Agency on Wednesday. “It seems to reflect the fact that they don’t understand how the semiconductor industry really works,” O’Donnell said. Economic sanctions would