Following the closure of three local travel agencies within the past week that affected more than 1,660 customers, the government said that it would lead an overhaul of travel industry supervision mechanisms in the hope of avoiding such incidents.
Last Friday, the Taipei-based Hsi Yang Yang Travel Service Co (喜洋洋旅行社) bounced some checks and it was discovered that the company president Chu Hsiang-ping (屈湘平) had embezzled NT$13.2 million (US$400,000), affecting 612 customers who had booked overseas tours with the company during the Lunar New Year holidays.
Then on thursday it was revealed that Taipei-based Perth Travel Service Co's (辰欣旅行社) chief executive Liu Chung-hsing (劉中興) had fled the nation on Monday after having embezzled more than NT$42 million in group tour fees. Taipei-based Eagle Tours Co (金鷹旅行社) reported the similar case yesterday.
More than 70 tour groups, 1,540 customers, discovered that their plans for Lunar New Year trips to Thailand, Subic Bay, Cebu and China were in ruins following the travel industry's largest debacle in a decade.
"Although time is limited, we'll try our best to help these customers transfer to other travel agencies," Roget Hsu (許高慶), secretary general of the Travel Agents Association of Taiwan (旅行公會全國聯合會), said at a press conference yesterday.
The association have prioritized customers whose destinations were Asian countries, such as Thailand and Indonesia, where Taiwanese travelers only require a landing visa, and South Korea, a visa-free country for Taiwanese passport holders, when providing assistance to those wishing to switch tours, providing that plane tickets and accommodation are still available.
Nearly 200 people have already accepted the association's new arrangements, he said.
As Hsi Yang Yang and Perth are both members of the Travel Quality Assurance Association (品保協會), the insurance payouts will be NT$10 million for each company.
As of yesterday, 359 Hsi Yang Yang clients had registered with the quality assurance association group to recover tour fees totaling NT$7.3 million. They would obtain full compensation from the insurers, said the association's chairman Boggy Lin (林進榮).
In Perth's case, 1,302 customers have so far filed complaints with the association for a total amount of NT$32.5 million. Among them are 1,072 people who payed a total of NT$28 million by credit card. These payments could be claimed back from the credit card companies, Lin said.
The remaining 230 victims paid a total of NT$4.4 million in cash, and they will be reimbursed through the insurance scheme.
The Tourism Bureau urged other victims to contact the quality assurance association by early next month at the latest to ensure that they receive their compensation in full.
Chang Shi-chung (張錫聰), director of the hotel, travel and training division at the Tourism Bureau, announced that the government would convene a meeting with representatives from the tourist industry and consumer advocacy groups on Feb. 26, the first working day after the Lunar New Year holiday, to examine the flawed supervision mechanism.
He urged tourists to check their booking records with airlines before their trips to ensure that they have not also been the victim of fraud.
Condemning the two cases, the Consumers' Foundation (消基會) said investigators should launch probes and freeze the assets of the agencies' bosses and shareholders for the purposes of future compensation, secretary-general Yu Kai-hsiung (游開雄) said.
He stressed that consumers should be more alert when they are offered cheap tours in peak seasons.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday said that its investment plan in Arizona is going according to schedule, following a local media report claiming that the company is planning to break ground on its third wafer fab in the US in June. In a statement, TSMC said it does not comment on market speculation, but that its investments in Arizona are proceeding well. TSMC is investing more than US$65 billion in Arizona to build three advanced wafer fabs. The first one has started production using the 4-nanometer (nm) process, while the second one would start mass production using the