China has chosen the Lunar New Year holidays, when 70 million people will travel by rail, to showcase its first high speed trains, but pains are being taken to downplay the fact that they were made abroad.
With great fanfare, the railways ministry announced that 15 bullet trains had been put into service for the busy holiday season, when the rail network is stretched to the limit.
The 40-day travel period began on Feb. 3 ahead of the official start to the Lunar New Year tomorrow, a time that centuries of Chinese tradition dictates should be spent with families.
PHOTO: AFP
To carry the returning relatives, the "CRH" (China Railway High-Speed) trains are now running on some of the nation's key routes -- including from Beijing to Shanghai, and Shanghai to Guangzhou.
Although they are now only chugging along at 160kph as they go through a trial period, from April 18 they will be able to start hitting their top speeds of 250kph.
The fastest travel time from Shanghai to the Beijing will then be cut to five hours from nine.
"The main goal of the commercial launch of these trains is to increase passenger capacity during the New Year vacation period and also to gain experience for the official launch," ministry spokesman Liang Chenggu said.
By 2020, the bullet trains will steam along 130,000km of track -- just over a third of the nation's rail network.
Amid the hype surrounding the new trains, authorities have not been shy about singing the praises of what they call a homegrown technological success.
The Asian giant, the world's fourth-largest economy, is keen to show off the new bullet trains as evidence that it can develop its own technology in key sectors, and is not simply the world's workshop.
"China has now mastered the basic technology needed for operating trains at more than 200 kilometres an hour," Liang said.
"The CRH shows that the Chinese rail industry ... has entered the new high-speed age," he added, emphasizing the ministry "owns the intellectual property rights" to the engineering know-how.
But the trains were largely built abroad on the basis of technology transfer agreements with global industry heavy-hitters such as Japan's Mitsubishi-Kawasaki, Canada's Bombardier, German giant Siemens and France's Alstom.
The first Alstom train, a model made in Italy, is set to hit the Chinese tracks from mid-April.
The head of Alstom's operations in China, Alain Berger, said its first CRH train to arrive in Changchun "will likely be decked out in China's national colors, and we'll say it was `made in China.'"
"That's not exactly true. But the subsequent trains will be put together in China, little by little," he said.
"Everyone knows -- the media and experts alike -- that these trains were made with foreign technology. Emblazoning the trains with the CRH logo is a matter of ego. It's not a big deal," he said.
Alstom will eventually deliver a total of 60 trains to China in a contract worth 620 million euros (US$810 million).
One Western industry expert who asked not to be named said the key issue for the future would be to monitor the changing relationship between China and the key players in the sector.
"We've never seen technology transfers of this scope. We don't know how this will develop and how the foreign firms will continue to play the game," the source said.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
‘LEGACY CHIPS’: Chinese companies have dramatically increased mature chip production capacity, but the West’s drive for secure supply chains offers a lifeline for Taiwan When Powerchip Technology Corp (力晶科技) entered a deal with the eastern Chinese city of Hefei in 2015 to set up a new chip foundry, it hoped the move would help provide better access to the promising Chinese market. However, nine years later, that Chinese foundry, Nexchip Semiconductor Corp (合晶集成), has become one of its biggest rivals in the legacy chip space, leveraging steep discounts after Beijing’s localization call forced Powerchip to give up the once-lucrative business making integrated circuits for Chinese flat panels. Nexchip is among Chinese foundries quickly winning market share in the crucial US$56.3 billion industry of so-called legacy
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known