Apple Computer's shares fell on Friday on the news that company had uncovered further troubles with its handling of stock options that will probably require Apple to revise its financial statements for years.
The company issued a statement late on Thursday that an internal investigation of stock option grants -- an inquiry that the company first disclosed in June -- had "discovered additional evidence of irregularities."
In a regulatory filing on Friday, Apple said the new evidence found by an independent counsel meant that the company's financial statements in the last few years and through its fiscal quarter ended April 1 should "no longer be relied upon."
PHOTO: AP
In June, Apple disclosed that the independent counsel, appointed by the company's outside directors, was focusing on stock option grants made from 1997 to 2001. Stock option grants routinely can be cashed in, or exercised, over periods of five years and even 10 years, so problems from that earlier period could require recent financial reports to be revised.
Any financial restatements that result from the stock options inquiry, analysts said, would not be cash charges. Thus, they note, the financial fundamentals of the company will not be affected.
But the key issue, analysts said, is whether the investigation taints Apple's visionary leader and chief executive, Steven Jobs.
"The No.1 question we get from investors is, `Is Steve Jobs in trouble?"' said Shaw Wu, an analyst for American Technology Research. "Our best assessment is no."
Since he returned to Apple in 1997, Jobs has never been a member of the board's compensation committee, Wu noted. And Jobs does not seem to have benefited from stock options irregularities, Wu concluded. Based on his review of eight years of Apple's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Wu said, "We feel pretty strongly that Steve Jobs is not liable."
Investors' initial concerns about the Apple disclosure seemed to abate in the course of the day. After falling as much as 9 percent before noon, Apple shares rebounded in the afternoon, closing off less than 2 percent, down US$1.29 a share, to US$68.30.
In its SEC filing on Friday, Apple gave no hint about the "additional evidence of irregularities." In June, the company did say that one of the stock option grants being scrutinized was to Jobs. The company did not specify the grant, but the big one to Jobs during the period under inquiry was for 10 million shares, effective Jan. 12, 2000.
The company announced the option grant to Jobs on Jan. 19. But options were priced at US$87.19 a share, the lowest closing price in the two months up to Jan. 12. By Jan. 19, Apple's stock price had risen to US$106.56.
In those days, it was not uncommon for companies to report stock option grants several days or weeks after a grant was made. Since 2002, companies have been required by law to report stock option grants within two days.
Compensation experts say the lag in reporting Jobs' grant raised questions about Apple's disclosure practices, and left open the door for backdating the price to a lower level, which makes the option much more valuable if a company's share price rises.
For years, Apple has had an inconsistent approach to compensation, at least at the top, analysts say. When Jobs first came back to Apple in 1997, he was interim chief executive and received a salary of US$1 a year.
In 2000, Jobs took on the title of chief executive, and the board awarded him the stock option grant and a Gulfstream V jet. In 2003, the option grant was swept aside, but Jobs was awarded 5 million restricted shares of Apple stock, vesting in three years.
Three experts in the high technology industry have said that US President Donald Trump’s pledge to impose higher tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors is part of an effort to force Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to the negotiating table. In a speech to Republicans on Jan. 27, Trump said he intends to impose tariffs on Taiwan to bring chip production to the US. “The incentive is going to be they’re not going to want to pay a 25, 50 or even a 100 percent tax,” he said. Darson Chiu (邱達生), an economics professor at Taichung-based Tunghai University and director-general of
‘LEGACY CHIPS’: Chinese companies have dramatically increased mature chip production capacity, but the West’s drive for secure supply chains offers a lifeline for Taiwan When Powerchip Technology Corp (力晶科技) entered a deal with the eastern Chinese city of Hefei in 2015 to set up a new chip foundry, it hoped the move would help provide better access to the promising Chinese market. However, nine years later, that Chinese foundry, Nexchip Semiconductor Corp (合晶集成), has become one of its biggest rivals in the legacy chip space, leveraging steep discounts after Beijing’s localization call forced Powerchip to give up the once-lucrative business making integrated circuits for Chinese flat panels. Nexchip is among Chinese foundries quickly winning market share in the crucial US$56.3 billion industry of so-called legacy
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
A move by US President Donald Trump to slap a 25 percent tariff on all steel imports is expected to place Taiwan-made steel, which already has a 25 percent tariff, on an equal footing, the Taiwan Steel & Iron Industries Association said yesterday. Speaking with CNA, association chairman Hwang Chien-chih (黃建智) said such an equal footing is expected to boost Taiwan’s competitive edge against other countries in the US market, describing the tariffs as "positive" for Taiwanese steel exporters. On Monday, Trump signed two executive orders imposing the new metal tariffs on imported steel and aluminum with no exceptions and exemptions, effective