In line with its general plans for privatization, the government intends to sell off its shares in Fuhwa Financial Holding Co (復華金控) next year and assess the possibilities of doing likewise in several other state-controlled financial institutions, a government official said yesterday.
Through the state-run Bank of Taiwan (台灣銀行) and Land Bank of Taiwan (土地銀行), the government currently owns a 14 percent stake in the nation's 11th-largest financial holding firm, making it the institution's third-largest shareholder with two seats on the Fuhwa's nine-member board of directors.
Yuanta Group (元大集團) occupies four seats on the Fuhwa Financial board, while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) controls three seats through the Central Investment Holding Co (中央投資公司).
Yuanta Group has boosted its stake in the firm from 30 percent last year to more than 55 percent and is expected to gain more seats after a board reshuffle scheduled for September.
At that point, the government will have less influence on the firm's decision-making and might as well reduce its share to zero, an official at the Ministry of Finance said on condition of anonymity.
This decision is also in line with the consensus reached by the finance panel organized for the Conference on Sustaining Taiwan's Economic Development, according to the official.
The panel suggested that the government retrench its stockholding in state-run enterprises which no longer bear policy responsibilities. Selling government holdings in these enterprises will also help boost their corporate governance, the panel suggested.
As for the Waterland Financial Holdings Co (國票金控), where the government maintains two director seats through its primary holdings in Taiwan Cooperative Bank (
However, the government's stake in Mega Financial Holding Co (兆豐金控) will be retained, the official said. Mega Financial faced a hostile takeover by Chinatrust Financial Holding Co (中信金控) several months ago, which was recently penalized for its controversial investment in Mega Financial.
HORMUZ ISSUE: The US president said he expected crude prices to drop at the end of the war, which he called a ‘minor excursion’ that could continue ‘for a little while’ The United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Kuwait started reducing oil production, as the near-closure of the crucial Strait of Hormuz ripples through energy markets and affects global supply. Abu Dhabi National Oil Co (ADNOC) is “managing offshore production levels to address storage requirements,” the company said in a statement, without giving details. Kuwait Petroleum Corp said it was lowering production at its oil fields and refineries after “Iranian threats against safe passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz.” The war in the Middle East has all but closed Hormuz, the narrow waterway linking the Persian Gulf to the open seas,
Taiwan has enough crude oil reserves for more than 100 days and sufficient natural gas reserves for more than 11 days, both above the regulatory safety requirement, Minister of Economic Affairs Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) said yesterday, adding that the government would prioritize domestic price stability as conflicts in the Middle East continue. Overall, energy supply for this month is secure, and the government is continuing efforts to ensure sufficient supply for next month, Kung told reporters after meeting with representatives from business groups at the ministry in Taipei. The ministry has been holding daily cross-ministry meetings at the Executive Yuan to ensure
RATIONING: The proposal would give the Trump administration ample leverage to negotiate investments in the US as it decides how many chips to give each country US officials are debating a new regulatory framework for exporting artificial intelligence (AI) chips and are considering requiring foreign nations to invest in US AI data centers or security guarantees as a condition for granting exports of 200,000 chips or more, according to a document seen by Reuters. The rules are not yet final and could change. They would be the first attempt to regulate the flow of AI chips to US allies and partners since US President Donald Trump’s administration said it rescinded its predecessor’s so-called AI diffusion rules. Those rules sought to keep a significant amount of AI
A new worry has been rippling across the stock market lately: Entire businesses, not just their employees, might be thrown out of work. While most economists say fears of an artificial intelligence (AI) job apocalypse are overblown, seismic shifts have happened in the past after big tech breakthroughs. The IT revolution of the 1990s led to a surge in productivity that sped up the US economy for several years. It also rendered companies or even industries largely redundant — from travel agents and stockbrokers to classified advertising and newspapers, or video rental stores. Economists expect AI would deliver higher productivity,