The US dollar was lower against its major rivals on Friday after a day of choppy trading.
The greenback started the New York session sharply lower, with the euro, pound and Swiss franc touching fresh one-year highs overnight and the yen tapping its highest levels in eight months.
The dollar then alternately surged and dipped in the wake of a narrower-than-expected US trade deficit for March, but the data were not strong enough for the US currency to sustain any gains by the end of the session.
Late in New York, the euro was at US$1.2921, up from US$1.2839 late Thursday, according to EBS. The US dollar was at ?10.06, weaker than ?10.63 late Thursday. The euro was around ?42.17, compared with ?41.84, and the dollar was quoted at CHF1.1978, compared with CHF1.2155 late Thursday. Sterling was trading at US$1.8935, up from US$1.8792.
"The US trade deficit for March was smaller than expected, and while there are positive [GDP] implications, the implications for the dollar are minor," said Marc Chandler, global head of currency research at Brown Brothers Harriman in New York.
Chandler said that given the widespread dollar bearishness in the market, it is hard for the greenback to sustain any strength.
"The short-term market is keen to sell into dollar upticks. Sentiment remains extremely poor," he said.
Snap-back likely
Still, in the face of the dollar's sharp losses this week, talk is increasing about a growing likelihood of a snap-back for the US currency. After the US dollar failed to strengthen following the Federal Reserve policy statement, which the market viewed as somewhat hawkish, and the US Treasury opted not to name China a currency manipulator, many had suspected something like a solid trade figure could resuscitate the US dollar.
"The fact that many market participants have been looking for the correction for well over a week implies the market has not been positioned for this type of move down in the dollar," Robert Lynch, a currency strategist at HSBC in New York said. "And that in itself is a contributor to the current dollar selloff."
Investors are mixed on just what it will take for the dollar to correct, with some awaiting vocal protests from a Group of Seven country official and others looking for a correction from the price action itself.
Indeed, as the yen continues to strengthen against the US dollar, many analysts have speculated that Japan, which traditionally has been particularly vocal about the appreciation of its currency, will likely be the first country to speak out about the US dollar's decline.
Japanese Finance Minister Sadakazu Tanigaki reiterated on Friday that sharp foreign exchange rate moves are "undesirable," but stopped short of describing the yen's move as excessive.
He repeated that there is no change in Japan's foreign exchange stance, which is based on the Group of Seven leading nations' agreement that exchange rates should move in a way that reflects economic fundamentals.
Affecting firms
When asked at a regular press conference on Friday about growing views that a fall in the dollar below the psychologically important ?10.00 line could hurt corporate profits, Tanigaki said there is "no doubt" that sharp US dollar/yen falls would affect companies.
The finance minister has continued to say that excessive foreign exchange rate volatility is "undesirable" and that the government is watching the market, but he has refrained from warning that Tokyo will "take appropriate action" in exchange markets if needed, a phrase that was frequently used when the Ministry of Finance was intervening heavily in the market for 15 months until March 2004.
Elsewhere, European Central Bank officials continue to sound hawkish amid speculation that the ECB could raise rates by 50 basis points next month rather than the 25 basis points expected.
HORMUZ ISSUE: The US president said he expected crude prices to drop at the end of the war, which he called a ‘minor excursion’ that could continue ‘for a little while’ The United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Kuwait started reducing oil production, as the near-closure of the crucial Strait of Hormuz ripples through energy markets and affects global supply. Abu Dhabi National Oil Co (ADNOC) is “managing offshore production levels to address storage requirements,” the company said in a statement, without giving details. Kuwait Petroleum Corp said it was lowering production at its oil fields and refineries after “Iranian threats against safe passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz.” The war in the Middle East has all but closed Hormuz, the narrow waterway linking the Persian Gulf to the open seas,
Taiwan has enough crude oil reserves for more than 100 days and sufficient natural gas reserves for more than 11 days, both above the regulatory safety requirement, Minister of Economic Affairs Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) said yesterday, adding that the government would prioritize domestic price stability as conflicts in the Middle East continue. Overall, energy supply for this month is secure, and the government is continuing efforts to ensure sufficient supply for next month, Kung told reporters after meeting with representatives from business groups at the ministry in Taipei. The ministry has been holding daily cross-ministry meetings at the Executive Yuan to ensure
RATIONING: The proposal would give the Trump administration ample leverage to negotiate investments in the US as it decides how many chips to give each country US officials are debating a new regulatory framework for exporting artificial intelligence (AI) chips and are considering requiring foreign nations to invest in US AI data centers or security guarantees as a condition for granting exports of 200,000 chips or more, according to a document seen by Reuters. The rules are not yet final and could change. They would be the first attempt to regulate the flow of AI chips to US allies and partners since US President Donald Trump’s administration said it rescinded its predecessor’s so-called AI diffusion rules. Those rules sought to keep a significant amount of AI
A new worry has been rippling across the stock market lately: Entire businesses, not just their employees, might be thrown out of work. While most economists say fears of an artificial intelligence (AI) job apocalypse are overblown, seismic shifts have happened in the past after big tech breakthroughs. The IT revolution of the 1990s led to a surge in productivity that sped up the US economy for several years. It also rendered companies or even industries largely redundant — from travel agents and stockbrokers to classified advertising and newspapers, or video rental stores. Economists expect AI would deliver higher productivity,