The Bush administration on Wed-nesday prepared to argue the case for American beef, under a cloud since the discovery of mad cow disease, before two audiences an ocean apart -- the US Congress and the Japanese government.
US Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman was scheduled to testify before the House of Representatives Agriculture Committee at 2pm, giving lawmakers their first opportunity to quiz the Bush administration on the Dec. 23 discovery of the first American case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy.
Veneman previewed her testimony during an interview on Wednesday with a North Dakota radio station, saying it was too early to speculate on when foreign countries would begin relaxing their bans on American beef and cattle.
But she said that foreign countries should "at least open up to the least-risk product, boneless beef" from the US.
Veneman also said the Food and Drug Administration would soon announce new restrictions on animal feed, but she gave no details. FDA officials were not available for comment.
Mad cow disease is believed to be spread through feed contaminated with cattle parts. US industry sources have speculated that the FDA might ban the use of cattle blood as a protein supplement for calves.
US agriculture and health officials are in Tokyo this week trying to persuade Japan to relax a ban on American beef that was imposed just after the Dec. 23 finding of mad cow disease in a Holstein slaughtered in Washington state.
They also want Japan and other Asian countries to accept US beef that was already en route in container ships prior to Dec. 23.
Japan normally is the largest foreign buyer of American beef, importing around one-third of the US$3 billion worth of beef sold abroad each year.
A form of mad cow disease has been linked to about 140 human deaths, mostly in Europe, which suffered an outbreak starting in the 1980s.
A House Agriculture Committee aide said Veneman likely will face questions on the USDA's new ban on cattle too sick or injured to stand, or "downer" cattle, and on the agency's slow movement on detailing plans for testing those animals for mad cow disease.
The USDA tightened some of its safeguards against the disease following the discovery of the Washington state case.
All downer cattle -- animals that arrive for slaughter unable to walk -- have been banned from food production. The USDA also has proscribed some cattle parts, including small intestines, from the food chain out of fears they could carry the abnormal protein associated with mad cow disease.
But consumer groups complain that the USDA has been slow to act and that the federal government needs to do more. Some want to shift meat inspections out of the farmer-friendly USDA to an agency that they think would worry less about agriculture industry interests and more about food safety.
Representative Gary Ackerman, a New York Democrat, launched another attempt on Wednesday to ban all downer animals, not just cattle, from the human food chain.
USDA investigators are still searching for several dozen cattle that were the herdmates of the Washington state Holstein cow found infected with the disease.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known
US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose up to 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan’s semiconductor exports to the US to encourage chip manufacturers to move their production facilities to the US, but experts are questioning his strategy, warning it could harm industries on both sides. “I’m very confused and surprised that the Trump administration would try and do this,” Bob O’Donnell, chief analyst and founder of TECHnalysis Research in California, said in an interview with the Central News Agency on Wednesday. “It seems to reflect the fact that they don’t understand how the semiconductor industry really works,” O’Donnell said. Economic sanctions would