The US State Department has accused two leading US aerospace companies of 123 violations of export laws in connection with the transfer of satellite and rocket data to China during the 1990s.
The Boeing Co and Hughes Electronics Corp, a unit of General Motors, were notified of the accusations last week. The letter outlining the accusations was made public earlier this week by the Office of Defense Trade Controls, the State Department unit that regulates defense-related trade.
The letter provides new details of how US companies competed for Chinese business by offering to transfer aerospace data in connection with launchings of their satellites. The information included responses to inquiries by the Chinese and others about failures of the rockets carrying those satellites.
The US stopped permitting the use of US satellites for Chinese aerospace ventures in 1999. At the time, the former president Bill Clinton's administration had concerns over China's aid to missile programs in North Korea and Pakistan. Since the technology used to launch missiles is similar to that used for civilian rockets and satellites, there are tight curbs on exports of aerospace and satellite equipment and services.
The State Department alleges that the companies violated arms export laws and regulations when they failed to obtain State Department approval before transferring information to Chinese-related entities, some private and some governmental. It included data on rocket failures, guidance systems, telemetry and aerodynamics.
The activities at issue relate to work by Hughes during the 1990s. Boeing was cited because it acquired Hughes Space and Communications, a piece of Hughes, in 2000.
The companies have denied wrongdoing. Company spokesmen were not available to comment yesterday. But the letter indicates that lawyers for the companies assert that the activities in question were lawful because the information that was transferred did not fit the definition of a licensable "defense service" or was constitutionally protected as "speech."
The companies face fines of up to US$500,000 for each count -- over $60 million -- as well as losing the ability to obtain future approval for exports, a major part of their business. In the past, bans on exporting have been of limited scope and duration.
The filing is unusual, officials said, since companies typically negotiate a settlement for lesser amounts with the government. One year ago, Loral Space and Communications agreed to pay US$20 million, a record fine in a case involving one of several satellite issues in the case against Boeing and Hughes. If there is no settlement, the case would go before an administrative law judge.
The letter, the civil equivalent of an indictment, was signed by William Lowell, director of the trade controls unit, who is leaving his job.
Friends of Lowell, who asked not to be identified, said his resignation was related to concerns that his office is being reorganized to make it easier for US defense companies to export sensitive technology.
State Department officials have said that the reorganization was meant to improve the defense trade unit's performance.
TAKING STOCK: A Taiwanese cookware firm in Vietnam urged customers to assess inventory or place orders early so shipments can reach the US while tariffs are paused Taiwanese businesses in Vietnam are exploring alternatives after the White House imposed a 46 percent import duty on Vietnamese goods, following US President Donald Trump’s announcement of “reciprocal” tariffs on the US’ trading partners. Lo Shih-liang (羅世良), chairman of Brico Industry Co (裕茂工業), a Taiwanese company that manufactures cast iron cookware and stove components in Vietnam, said that more than 40 percent of his business was tied to the US market, describing the constant US policy shifts as an emotional roller coaster. “I work during the day and stay up all night watching the news. I’ve been following US news until 3am
UNCERTAINTY: Innolux activated a stringent supply chain management mechanism, as it did during the COVID-19 pandemic, to ensure optimal inventory levels for customers Flat-panel display makers AUO Corp (友達) and Innolux Corp (群創) yesterday said that about 12 to 20 percent of their display business is at risk of potential US tariffs and that they would relocate production or shipment destinations to mitigate the levies’ effects. US tariffs would have a direct impact of US$200 million on AUO’s revenue, company chairman Paul Peng (彭雙浪) told reporters on the sidelines of the Touch Taiwan trade show in Taipei yesterday. That would make up about 12 percent of the company’s overall revenue. To cope with the tariff uncertainty, AUO plans to allocate its production to manufacturing facilities in
Six years ago, LVMH’s billionaire CEO Bernard Arnault and US President Donald Trump cut the blue ribbon on a factory in rural Texas that would make designer handbags for Louis Vuitton, one of the world’s best-known luxury brands. However, since the high-profile opening, the factory has faced a host of problems limiting production, 11 former Louis Vuitton employees said. The site has consistently ranked among the worst-performing for Louis Vuitton globally, “significantly” underperforming other facilities, said three former Louis Vuitton workers and a senior industry source, who cited internal rankings shared with staff. The plant’s problems — which have not
TARIFF CONCERNS: The chipmaker cited global uncertainty from US tariffs and a weakening economic outlook, but said its Singapore expansion remains on track Vanguard International Semiconductor Corp (世界先進), a foundry service provider specializing in producing power management and display driver chips, yesterday withdrew its full-year revenue projection of moderate growth for this year, as escalating US tariff tensions raised uncertainty and concern about a potential economic recession. The Hsinchu-based chipmaker in February said revenues this year would grow mildly from last year based on improving supply chain inventory levels and market demand. At the time, it also anticipated gradual quarter revenue growth. However, the US’ sweeping tariff policy has upended the industry’s supply chains and weakened economic prospects for the world economy, it said. “Now