Jack Welch's gut told him it was time to give up his lavish retirement perks, and investors can only hope that his decision is contagious.
Welch insisted there was nothing improper about hisretirement deal in a Wall Street Journal op-ed article last Monday, but nevertheless announced he would start paying General Electric an estimated US$2 million a year for the use of the company jet, Manhattan apartment and other perks that were part of a 1996 agreement to keep him on the job for another few years.
September is turning out to be a moment of reckoning for extravagant executive compensation packages. William McDonough, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, recently attacked excessive CEO pay as a moral failure. He noted that chief executives earn on average 400 times their average employee's income, up from 42 times in 1980.
Stories of greed in the executive suite being taken to criminal extremes have also dominated the headlines. Dennis Kozlowski and other former Tyco officers have been indicted by the Manhattan district attorney, Robert Morgenthau, accused of systematically looting company coffers.
The Tyco case, at least for the moment, seems to set the gold standard for misconduct by a management team intent on seeing just how far it can go, absent any meaningful corporate governance. The result was a surreal world of US$6,000 shower curtains, US$15,000 poodle-shaped umbrella holders and US$2 million Sardinian birthday parties for the boss' second wife.
This week the Conference Board, a business-backed research group, issued a report acknowledging that executive compensation has become excessive in many instances, bearing no relationship to a company's long-term performance. The group calls on companies to treat stock options as expenses affecting their bottom line, and to strengthen the independence of compensation committees.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has begun an informal inquiry into Welch's package, and whether it was properly disclosed by the company. The SEC will have to tighten comparatively lax disclosure rules involving the goodies offered by companies to their former officers, and demand more realistic rules for determining the cost to shareholders. Also, the commission wants to require mutual funds to report how they vote their shares on compensation and other corporate governance matters. This is an important step toward increased shareholder vigilance.
Congress, for its part, must adjust a number of tax rules that encourage abuses. It is inexcusable that a retired CEO flying on the company jet for personal business can claim for income-tax purposes that the free trip is worth about the amount of the lowest coach fare available on the same route. The trip may actually cost the company tens of thousands of dollars.
Investors were often willing to overlook the excesses of management teams during the recent bull market because the dollar amounts seemed paltry compared with a company's overall revenues, and because share prices were rising. Now that the boom is over, the idea that imperial CEOs can help themselves to corporate assets looks more like the reckless conduct it always was.
Three experts in the high technology industry have said that US President Donald Trump’s pledge to impose higher tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors is part of an effort to force Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to the negotiating table. In a speech to Republicans on Jan. 27, Trump said he intends to impose tariffs on Taiwan to bring chip production to the US. “The incentive is going to be they’re not going to want to pay a 25, 50 or even a 100 percent tax,” he said. Darson Chiu (邱達生), an economics professor at Taichung-based Tunghai University and director-general of
‘LEGACY CHIPS’: Chinese companies have dramatically increased mature chip production capacity, but the West’s drive for secure supply chains offers a lifeline for Taiwan When Powerchip Technology Corp (力晶科技) entered a deal with the eastern Chinese city of Hefei in 2015 to set up a new chip foundry, it hoped the move would help provide better access to the promising Chinese market. However, nine years later, that Chinese foundry, Nexchip Semiconductor Corp (合晶集成), has become one of its biggest rivals in the legacy chip space, leveraging steep discounts after Beijing’s localization call forced Powerchip to give up the once-lucrative business making integrated circuits for Chinese flat panels. Nexchip is among Chinese foundries quickly winning market share in the crucial US$56.3 billion industry of so-called legacy
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
A move by US President Donald Trump to slap a 25 percent tariff on all steel imports is expected to place Taiwan-made steel, which already has a 25 percent tariff, on an equal footing, the Taiwan Steel & Iron Industries Association said yesterday. Speaking with CNA, association chairman Hwang Chien-chih (黃建智) said such an equal footing is expected to boost Taiwan’s competitive edge against other countries in the US market, describing the tariffs as "positive" for Taiwanese steel exporters. On Monday, Trump signed two executive orders imposing the new metal tariffs on imported steel and aluminum with no exceptions and exemptions, effective